{"id":{"repo_id":"calgary","oai_identifier":"oai:ucalgary.scholaris.ca:1880/124123"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/calgary/oai:ucalgary.scholaris.ca:1880/124123","repository":{"repo_id":"calgary","name":"University of Calgary","base_url":"https://ucalgary.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"“We Don’t Tolerate it but Yes, it Does Happen”: Structural Facilitators and Barriers to Addressing Harm in Graduate Supervision","abstract":"Effective graduate supervision is recognized as an essential part of preparing the next generation of researchers and educators. Quality graduate supervision has been shown to contribute to graduate student satisfaction, well-being, and completion. Correspondingly, research suggests that poor supervision negatively impacts student well-being and retention. In spite of the extant research, supervisory harm is still a major problem globally and in Canadian research-intensive universities. I engaged a qualitative case study to examine the issue of graduate supervisory harm in one Canadian research-intensive university. Specifically, I sought to answer the question: to what extent do the policies and processes of the Canadian research-intensive university under study facilitate and/or limit the ability of leaders in graduate education to address harm in graduate supervision? I reviewed relevant policies, procedures, and best practice resources used by the institution under study in order to prepare for 10 semi-structured interviews with current or past leaders in graduate education who could speak to experiences at 10 of the 13 faculties involved in graduate education. Employing a critical lens, I conducted a structural analysis of my findings, concluding that addressing supervisory harm has economic, political, regulatory, cultural, and educational elements and therefore requires interventions in each of those dimensions. Key interventions include revision of student funding approaches, additional options for complaint review, changes to leader hiring practices, mobilization of faculty association members, redesign of disclosure office practices, policy updates, statistics monitoring, workload changes, formal recognition of supervision, development of a supervisory culture, faculty development for graduate supervisors and education leaders, and specific training for graduate students.","abstract_html":"Effective graduate supervision is recognized as an essential part of preparing the next generation of researchers and educators. Quality graduate supervision has been shown to contribute to graduate student satisfaction, well-being, and completion. Correspondingly, research suggests that poor supervision negatively impacts student well-being and retention. In spite of the extant research, supervisory harm is still a major problem globally and in Canadian research-intensive universities. I engaged a qualitative case study to examine the issue of graduate supervisory harm in one Canadian research-intensive university. Specifically, I sought to answer the question: to what extent do the policies and processes of the Canadian research-intensive university under study facilitate and/or limit the ability of leaders in graduate education to address harm in graduate supervision? I reviewed relevant policies, procedures, and best practice resources used by the institution under study in order to prepare for 10 semi-structured interviews with current or past leaders in graduate education who could speak to experiences at 10 of the 13 faculties involved in graduate education. Employing a critical lens, I conducted a structural analysis of my findings, concluding that addressing supervisory harm has economic, political, regulatory, cultural, and educational elements and therefore requires interventions in each of those dimensions. Key interventions include revision of student funding approaches, additional options for complaint review, changes to leader hiring practices, mobilization of faculty association members, redesign of disclosure office practices, policy updates, statistics monitoring, workload changes, formal recognition of supervision, development of a supervisory culture, faculty development for graduate supervisors and education leaders, and specific training for graduate students.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kelly-Turner, Kenna"],"institution":"Werklund School of Education","degree_name":"Doctor of Education (EdD)","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":"Education Graduate Program – Educational Research","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Kawalilak, Colleen"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Lenters, Kimberly","Groen, Janet"],"year":2026,"date_issued":"2026-01-29","date_published":"2026-01-29","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:30:44Z","subjects":["Graduate Supervision","Supervisory Harm","Supervisory Relationship","Educational Leadership"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Unless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/51087"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/51087","href":"https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/51087","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/1880/124123","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Kawalilak, Colleen"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Lenters, Kimberly","Groen, Janet"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kelly-Turner, Kenna"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2026-02"]},{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-01-29T23:19:57Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2026-01-29"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["doctoral thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education Graduate Program – Educational Research"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Education (EdD)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Calgary"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Graduate Supervision","Supervisory Harm","Supervisory Relationship","Educational Leadership"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Unless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/51087"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/1880/124123"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Effective graduate supervision is recognized as an essential part of preparing the next generation of researchers and educators. Quality graduate supervision has been shown to contribute to graduate student satisfaction, well-being, and completion. Correspondingly, research suggests that poor supervision negatively impacts student well-being and retention. In spite of the extant research, supervisory harm is still a major problem globally and in Canadian research-intensive universities. I engaged a qualitative case study to examine the issue of graduate supervisory harm in one Canadian research-intensive university. Specifically, I sought to answer the question: to what extent do the policies and processes of the Canadian research-intensive university under study facilitate and/or limit the ability of leaders in graduate education to address harm in graduate supervision? I reviewed relevant policies, procedures, and best practice resources used by the institution under study in order to prepare for 10 semi-structured interviews with current or past leaders in graduate education who could speak to experiences at 10 of the 13 faculties involved in graduate education. Employing a critical lens, I conducted a structural analysis of my findings, concluding that addressing supervisory harm has economic, political, regulatory, cultural, and educational elements and therefore requires interventions in each of those dimensions. Key interventions include revision of student funding approaches, additional options for complaint review, changes to leader hiring practices, mobilization of faculty association members, redesign of disclosure office practices, policy updates, statistics monitoring, workload changes, formal recognition of supervision, development of a supervisory culture, faculty development for graduate supervisors and education leaders, and specific training for graduate students."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["“We Don’t Tolerate it but Yes, it Does Happen”: Structural Facilitators and Barriers to Addressing Harm in Graduate Supervision"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Kawalilak, Colleen"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Lenters, Kimberly","Groen, Janet"],"dc:creator":["Kelly-Turner, Kenna"],"dc:date":["2026-02"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-01-29T23:19:57Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2026-01-29"],"dc:description.abstract":["Effective graduate supervision is recognized as an essential part of preparing the next generation of researchers and educators. Quality graduate supervision has been shown to contribute to graduate student satisfaction, well-being, and completion. Correspondingly, research suggests that poor supervision negatively impacts student well-being and retention. In spite of the extant research, supervisory harm is still a major problem globally and in Canadian research-intensive universities. I engaged a qualitative case study to examine the issue of graduate supervisory harm in one Canadian research-intensive university. Specifically, I sought to answer the question: to what extent do the policies and processes of the Canadian research-intensive university under study facilitate and/or limit the ability of leaders in graduate education to address harm in graduate supervision? I reviewed relevant policies, procedures, and best practice resources used by the institution under study in order to prepare for 10 semi-structured interviews with current or past leaders in graduate education who could speak to experiences at 10 of the 13 faculties involved in graduate education. Employing a critical lens, I conducted a structural analysis of my findings, concluding that addressing supervisory harm has economic, political, regulatory, cultural, and educational elements and therefore requires interventions in each of those dimensions. Key interventions include revision of student funding approaches, additional options for complaint review, changes to leader hiring practices, mobilization of faculty association members, redesign of disclosure office practices, policy updates, statistics monitoring, workload changes, formal recognition of supervision, development of a supervisory culture, faculty development for graduate supervisors and education leaders, and specific training for graduate students."],"dc:identifier.doi":["https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/51087"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/1880/124123"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:rights":["Unless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."],"dc:subject":["Graduate Supervision","Supervisory Harm","Supervisory Relationship","Educational Leadership"],"dc:title":["“We Don’t Tolerate it but Yes, it Does Happen”: Structural Facilitators and Barriers to Addressing Harm in Graduate Supervision"],"dc:type":["doctoral thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education Graduate Program – Educational Research"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Education (EdD)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Calgary"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:30:44Z"}