{"id":{"repo_id":"calgary","oai_identifier":"oai:ucalgary.scholaris.ca:1880/112521"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/calgary/oai:ucalgary.scholaris.ca:1880/112521","repository":{"repo_id":"calgary","name":"University of Calgary","base_url":"https://ucalgary.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Climate Change in the Canadian Impact Assessment Process","abstract":"This thesis examines how climate change, particularly upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), have been considered in Canadian environmental impact assessment (EIA) of energy projects. The legal and policy framework on EIA for energy projects has evolved, and the recent transition from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 (CEAA 2012) regime to the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) is the most recent change. Although the CEAA 2012 and the IAA share similarities, they have different requirements with respect to GHG emissions. One of the major differences is that the IAA makes climate change considerations an essential factor for the assessment and decision-making phases of the review and approval of a proposed energy project. Under CEAA 2012, climate change considerations were not clearly spelt out, though there were several avenues for GHGs to be considered in the assessment process. This thesis reviews the former regime and practice under CEAA 2012, then examines the new regime, and the GHGs consideration in the EIA process in the United States of America (U.S).","abstract_html":"This thesis examines how climate change, particularly upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), have been considered in Canadian environmental impact assessment (EIA) of energy projects. The legal and policy framework on EIA for energy projects has evolved, and the recent transition from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 (CEAA 2012) regime to the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) is the most recent change. Although the CEAA 2012 and the IAA share similarities, they have different requirements with respect to GHG emissions. One of the major differences is that the IAA makes climate change considerations an essential factor for the assessment and decision-making phases of the review and approval of a proposed energy project. Under CEAA 2012, climate change considerations were not clearly spelt out, though there were several avenues for GHGs to be considered in the assessment process. This thesis reviews the former regime and practice under CEAA 2012, then examines the new regime, and the GHGs consideration in the EIA process in the United States of America (U.S).","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ajayi, Adewale Oluwapelumi"],"institution":"Law","degree_name":"Master of Laws (LLM)","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":"Law","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Stewart, Fenner L.","Wright, David W."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Ingelson, Allan","Oshionebo, Evaristus"],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-09-10","date_published":"2020-09-10","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:30:25Z","subjects":["Environmental Impact Assessment","Impact Assessment","Environmental Law","Upstream and Downstream Emissions","Greenhouse Gases (GHGs)","Oil and Gas Law"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38186"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38186","href":"http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38186","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1880/112521","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Stewart, Fenner L.","Wright, David W."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Ingelson, Allan","Oshionebo, Evaristus"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ajayi, Adewale Oluwapelumi"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2020-11"]},{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2020-09-14T13:52:43Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-09-14T13:52:43Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2020-09-10"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Calgary"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["master thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Law"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Laws (LLM)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Calgary"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Environmental Impact Assessment","Impact Assessment","Environmental Law","Upstream and Downstream Emissions","Greenhouse Gases (GHGs)","Oil and Gas Law"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38186"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1880/112521"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis examines how climate change, particularly upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), have been considered in Canadian environmental impact assessment (EIA) of energy projects. The legal and policy framework on EIA for energy projects has evolved, and the recent transition from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 (CEAA 2012) regime to the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) is the most recent change. Although the CEAA 2012 and the IAA share similarities, they have different requirements with respect to GHG emissions. One of the major differences is that the IAA makes climate change considerations an essential factor for the assessment and decision-making phases of the review and approval of a proposed energy project. Under CEAA 2012, climate change considerations were not clearly spelt out, though there were several avenues for GHGs to be considered in the assessment process. This thesis reviews the former regime and practice under CEAA 2012, then examines the new regime, and the GHGs consideration in the EIA process in the United States of America (U.S)."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Climate Change in the Canadian Impact Assessment Process"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Stewart, Fenner L.","Wright, David W."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Ingelson, Allan","Oshionebo, Evaristus"],"dc:creator":["Ajayi, Adewale Oluwapelumi"],"dc:date":["2020-11"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2020-09-14T13:52:43Z"],"dc:date.available":["2020-09-14T13:52:43Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2020-09-10"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis examines how climate change, particularly upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), have been considered in Canadian environmental impact assessment (EIA) of energy projects. The legal and policy framework on EIA for energy projects has evolved, and the recent transition from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 (CEAA 2012) regime to the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) is the most recent change. Although the CEAA 2012 and the IAA share similarities, they have different requirements with respect to GHG emissions. One of the major differences is that the IAA makes climate change considerations an essential factor for the assessment and decision-making phases of the review and approval of a proposed energy project. Under CEAA 2012, climate change considerations were not clearly spelt out, though there were several avenues for GHGs to be considered in the assessment process. This thesis reviews the former regime and practice under CEAA 2012, then examines the new regime, and the GHGs consideration in the EIA process in the United States of America (U.S)."],"dc:identifier.doi":["http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38186"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1880/112521"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Calgary"],"dc:rights":["University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."],"dc:subject":["Environmental Impact Assessment","Impact Assessment","Environmental Law","Upstream and Downstream Emissions","Greenhouse Gases (GHGs)","Oil and Gas Law"],"dc:title":["Climate Change in the Canadian Impact Assessment Process"],"dc:type":["master thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Law"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Laws (LLM)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Calgary"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:30:25Z"}