{"id":{"repo_id":"calgary","oai_identifier":"oai:ucalgary.scholaris.ca:11023/955"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/calgary/oai:ucalgary.scholaris.ca:11023/955","repository":{"repo_id":"calgary","name":"University of Calgary","base_url":"https://ucalgary.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":""Since Time Immemorial": China's Historical Claim in the South China Sea","abstract":"Four archipelagos in the South China Sea are territorially disputed: the Paracel, Spratly, and Pratas Islands, and Macclesfield Bank. The People’s Republic of China and Republic of China’s claims are embodied by a nine-dashed U-shaped boundary line originally drawn in an official Chinese map in 1948, which encompasses most of the South China Sea. Neither side has clarified what the line represents. Using ancient Chinese maps and texts, archival documents, relevant treaties, declarations, and laws, this thesis will conclude that it is best characterized as an islands attribution line, which centres the claim simply on the islands and features themselves. It does not delineate a historic rights waters zone, which confer certain exploitation and regulation privileges over all of the waters the line contains on the basis of historic Chinese dominance. The period of time examined is from 1644 to 2013; from the Qing Dynasty to the present.","abstract_html":"Four archipelagos in the South China Sea are territorially disputed: the Paracel, Spratly, and Pratas Islands, and Macclesfield Bank. The People’s Republic of China and Republic of China’s claims are embodied by a nine-dashed U-shaped boundary line originally drawn in an official Chinese map in 1948, which encompasses most of the South China Sea. Neither side has clarified what the line represents. Using ancient Chinese maps and texts, archival documents, relevant treaties, declarations, and laws, this thesis will conclude that it is best characterized as an islands attribution line, which centres the claim simply on the islands and features themselves. It does not delineate a historic rights waters zone, which confer certain exploitation and regulation privileges over all of the waters the line contains on the basis of historic Chinese dominance. The period of time examined is from 1644 to 2013; from the Qing Dynasty to the present.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Chung, Chris Pak Cheong"],"institution":"Graduate Studies","degree_name":"Master of Arts (MA)","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":"History","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Wright, David","Ferris, John"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-09-13","date_published":"2013-09-13","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:30:15Z","subjects":["Asia, Australia, and Oceania","International Law and"],"languages":["eng","chi"],"rights":["University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/27791"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/27791","href":"http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/27791","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11023/955","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Wright, David","Ferris, John"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Chung, Chris Pak Cheong"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2013-09-13T18:22:49Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2013-11-12T08:00:10Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013-09-13"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Calgary"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["master thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["History"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts (MA)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Calgary"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Asia, Australia, and Oceania","International Law and"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng","chi"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/27791"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11023/955"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Four archipelagos in the South China Sea are territorially disputed: the Paracel, Spratly, and Pratas Islands, and Macclesfield Bank. The People’s Republic of China and Republic of China’s claims are embodied by a nine-dashed U-shaped boundary line originally drawn in an official Chinese map in 1948, which encompasses most of the South China Sea. Neither side has clarified what the line represents. Using ancient Chinese maps and texts, archival documents, relevant treaties, declarations, and laws, this thesis will conclude that it is best characterized as an islands attribution line, which centres the claim simply on the islands and features themselves. It does not delineate a historic rights waters zone, which confer certain exploitation and regulation privileges over all of the waters the line contains on the basis of historic Chinese dominance. The period of time examined is from 1644 to 2013; from the Qing Dynasty to the present."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":[""Since Time Immemorial": China's Historical Claim in the South China Sea"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Wright, David","Ferris, John"],"dc:creator":["Chung, Chris Pak Cheong"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2013-09-13T18:22:49Z"],"dc:date.available":["2013-11-12T08:00:10Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2013-09-13"],"dc:description.abstract":["Four archipelagos in the South China Sea are territorially disputed: the Paracel, Spratly, and Pratas Islands, and Macclesfield Bank. The People’s Republic of China and Republic of China’s claims are embodied by a nine-dashed U-shaped boundary line originally drawn in an official Chinese map in 1948, which encompasses most of the South China Sea. Neither side has clarified what the line represents. Using ancient Chinese maps and texts, archival documents, relevant treaties, declarations, and laws, this thesis will conclude that it is best characterized as an islands attribution line, which centres the claim simply on the islands and features themselves. It does not delineate a historic rights waters zone, which confer certain exploitation and regulation privileges over all of the waters the line contains on the basis of historic Chinese dominance. The period of time examined is from 1644 to 2013; from the Qing Dynasty to the present."],"dc:identifier.doi":["http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/27791"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11023/955"],"dc:language.iso":["eng","chi"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Calgary"],"dc:rights":["University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."],"dc:subject":["Asia, Australia, and Oceania","International Law and"],"dc:title":[""Since Time Immemorial": China's Historical Claim in the South China Sea"],"dc:type":["master thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["History"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts (MA)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Calgary"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:30:15Z"}