{"id":{"repo_id":"calgary","oai_identifier":"oai:ucalgary.scholaris.ca:11023/3238"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/calgary/oai:ucalgary.scholaris.ca:11023/3238","repository":{"repo_id":"calgary","name":"University of Calgary","base_url":"https://ucalgary.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Determining the Maximal Physiological Steady State in Cycling with Precision: Critical Power Estimations or Self-selected Exercise Intensity?","abstract":"Giving the inherent limitations of critical power (CP) testing and the demanding maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) protocol, this thesis aimed: i) to compare the power outputs (POs) derived from two methods of estimating CP (i.e., the power-time relationship (CPHYP) and the 3-minute all-out test (CP3MIN)) and the determined MLSS; and ii) to test cyclists’ ability to predict their highest sustainable PO (CPSELF). Thirteen healthy young participants (26±3 yr; 69.0±9.2 kg; 174±10 cm; 60.4±5.9 mL·kg-1·min-1) were tested. PO at MLSS was lower than CPHYP and CP3MIN (p<0.05). PO at CPSELF was similar (p>0.05) to MLSS. The mean difference between the measures of MLSS and CPSELF was zero, and both methods presented similar (p>0.05) metabolic responses. The disagreement between CPHYP and CP3MIN with the PO at MLSS questions the ability of CP to estimate the maximal steady state, while CPSELF may offer an alternative approach to predict it with more precision.","abstract_html":"Giving the inherent limitations of critical power (CP) testing and the demanding maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) protocol, this thesis aimed: i) to compare the power outputs (POs) derived from two methods of estimating CP (i.e., the power-time relationship (CPHYP) and the 3-minute all-out test (CP3MIN)) and the determined MLSS; and ii) to test cyclists’ ability to predict their highest sustainable PO (CPSELF). Thirteen healthy young participants (26±3 yr; 69.0±9.2 kg; 174±10 cm; 60.4±5.9 mL·kg-1·min-1) were tested. PO at MLSS was lower than CPHYP and CP3MIN (p<0.05). PO at CPSELF was similar (p>0.05) to MLSS. The mean difference between the measures of MLSS and CPSELF was zero, and both methods presented similar (p>0.05) metabolic responses. The disagreement between CPHYP and CP3MIN with the PO at MLSS questions the ability of CP to estimate the maximal steady state, while CPSELF may offer an alternative approach to predict it with more precision.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mattioni Maturana, Felipe"],"institution":"Graduate Studies","degree_name":"Master of Science (MSc)","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Murias, Juan M.","Millet, Guillaume Y."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Paterson, Donald H","MacIntosh, Brian","Passfield, Louis"],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016","date_published":"2016","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:30:29Z","subjects":["Physiology"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/25609"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/25609","href":"http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/25609","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11023/3238","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Murias, Juan M.","Millet, Guillaume Y."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Paterson, Donald H","MacIntosh, Brian","Passfield, Louis"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mattioni Maturana, Felipe"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2016-08-31T15:00:23Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-08-31T15:00:23Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2016"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Calgary"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["master thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MSc)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Calgary"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Physiology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/25609"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11023/3238"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Giving the inherent limitations of critical power (CP) testing and the demanding maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) protocol, this thesis aimed: i) to compare the power outputs (POs) derived from two methods of estimating CP (i.e., the power-time relationship (CPHYP) and the 3-minute all-out test (CP3MIN)) and the determined MLSS; and ii) to test cyclists’ ability to predict their highest sustainable PO (CPSELF). Thirteen healthy young participants (26±3 yr; 69.0±9.2 kg; 174±10 cm; 60.4±5.9 mL·kg-1·min-1) were tested. PO at MLSS was lower than CPHYP and CP3MIN (p<0.05). PO at CPSELF was similar (p>0.05) to MLSS. The mean difference between the measures of MLSS and CPSELF was zero, and both methods presented similar (p>0.05) metabolic responses. The disagreement between CPHYP and CP3MIN with the PO at MLSS questions the ability of CP to estimate the maximal steady state, while CPSELF may offer an alternative approach to predict it with more precision."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Determining the Maximal Physiological Steady State in Cycling with Precision: Critical Power Estimations or Self-selected Exercise Intensity?"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Murias, Juan M.","Millet, Guillaume Y."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Paterson, Donald H","MacIntosh, Brian","Passfield, Louis"],"dc:creator":["Mattioni Maturana, Felipe"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2016-08-31T15:00:23Z"],"dc:date.available":["2016-08-31T15:00:23Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2016"],"dc:description.abstract":["Giving the inherent limitations of critical power (CP) testing and the demanding maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) protocol, this thesis aimed: i) to compare the power outputs (POs) derived from two methods of estimating CP (i.e., the power-time relationship (CPHYP) and the 3-minute all-out test (CP3MIN)) and the determined MLSS; and ii) to test cyclists’ ability to predict their highest sustainable PO (CPSELF). Thirteen healthy young participants (26±3 yr; 69.0±9.2 kg; 174±10 cm; 60.4±5.9 mL·kg-1·min-1) were tested. PO at MLSS was lower than CPHYP and CP3MIN (p<0.05). PO at CPSELF was similar (p>0.05) to MLSS. The mean difference between the measures of MLSS and CPSELF was zero, and both methods presented similar (p>0.05) metabolic responses. The disagreement between CPHYP and CP3MIN with the PO at MLSS questions the ability of CP to estimate the maximal steady state, while CPSELF may offer an alternative approach to predict it with more precision."],"dc:identifier.doi":["http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/25609"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11023/3238"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Calgary"],"dc:rights":["University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission."],"dc:subject":["Physiology"],"dc:title":["Determining the Maximal Physiological Steady State in Cycling with Precision: Critical Power Estimations or Self-selected Exercise Intensity?"],"dc:type":["master thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MSc)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Calgary"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:30:29Z"}