{"id":{"repo_id":"buffalo","oai_identifier":"oai:ubir.buffalo.edu:10477/83848"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/buffalo/oai:ubir.buffalo.edu:10477/83848","repository":{"repo_id":"buffalo","name":"Buffalo","base_url":"https://ubir.buffalo.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Negotiating Around the CEDAW Norms and the Locally Grounded Knowledge(s): Kurdish and Turkish Women’s Mobilizations around International Monitoring Mechanisms","abstract":"Ph.D.","abstract_html":"Ph.D.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ege Tatar, Elif"],"institution":"State University of New York at Buffalo","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Thomas, Gwynn","Global Gender and Sexuality Studies"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-06-17T19:54:44Z","date_published":"2022-06-17T19:54:44Z","updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:05:28Z","subjects":["gender studies"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Users of works found in University at Buffalo Institutional Repository (UBIR) are responsible for identifying and contacting the copyright owner for permission to reuse. University at Buffalo Libraries do not manage rights for copyright-protected works and cannot assist with permissions.","Copyright retained by author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10477/83848","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Thomas, Gwynn","Global Gender and Sexuality Studies"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ege Tatar, Elif"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2022-06-17T19:54:44Z","2020"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["State University of New York at Buffalo"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text","Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["gender studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Users of works found in University at Buffalo Institutional Repository (UBIR) are responsible for identifying and contacting the copyright owner for permission to reuse. University at Buffalo Libraries do not manage rights for copyright-protected works and cannot assist with permissions.","Copyright retained by author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10477/83848"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Ph.D.","This dissertation examines the Kurdish and Turkish women activists’ mobilizations around the CEDAW (The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women) monitoring mechanisms to study how the activists negotiate the intramovement tensions through their mobilizations around shadow report writing practices. Based on ethnographic fieldwork with the Kurdish and Turkish women’s rights activists between 2017-2019, combined with archival research, I argue that in their mobilizations around the CEDAW monitoring practices, the Kurdish and Turkish women activists negotiate each other at the intersections of three axes: the formal procedures and the language of the CEDAW, the locally-grounded knowledge(s) and the ethnic disputes. The activists make use of the legitimacy and the formality of the CEDAW and strategically shift to the rights-based discourse to justify their issues and demands in order to alleviate intramovement ethno-political tension and to pressure state. However, while doing so, they are also restrained/regulated by the formal discourses of the international women’s rights. They are frequently confronted by the discrepancies between the CEDAW norms and the complexity of the localized realities on the ground. By studying the activists’ negotiations in the shadow report writing settings this dissertation pays attention to the less discussed role of the activists on the ground, the intramovement dynamics and their navigations and contestations within the local level organizing.","**To request an accessible version of the file(s) associated with this item, contact library@buffalo.edu. Please include the item's persistent URL [http://hdl.handle.net/. . .] in your request.**"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Negotiating Around the CEDAW Norms and the Locally Grounded Knowledge(s): Kurdish and Turkish Women’s Mobilizations around International Monitoring Mechanisms"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Thomas, Gwynn","Global Gender and Sexuality Studies"],"dc:creator":["Ege Tatar, Elif"],"dc:date":["2022-06-17T19:54:44Z","2020"],"dc:description":["Ph.D.","This dissertation examines the Kurdish and Turkish women activists’ mobilizations around the CEDAW (The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women) monitoring mechanisms to study how the activists negotiate the intramovement tensions through their mobilizations around shadow report writing practices. Based on ethnographic fieldwork with the Kurdish and Turkish women’s rights activists between 2017-2019, combined with archival research, I argue that in their mobilizations around the CEDAW monitoring practices, the Kurdish and Turkish women activists negotiate each other at the intersections of three axes: the formal procedures and the language of the CEDAW, the locally-grounded knowledge(s) and the ethnic disputes. The activists make use of the legitimacy and the formality of the CEDAW and strategically shift to the rights-based discourse to justify their issues and demands in order to alleviate intramovement ethno-political tension and to pressure state. However, while doing so, they are also restrained/regulated by the formal discourses of the international women’s rights. They are frequently confronted by the discrepancies between the CEDAW norms and the complexity of the localized realities on the ground. By studying the activists’ negotiations in the shadow report writing settings this dissertation pays attention to the less discussed role of the activists on the ground, the intramovement dynamics and their navigations and contestations within the local level organizing.","**To request an accessible version of the file(s) associated with this item, contact library@buffalo.edu. Please include the item's persistent URL [http://hdl.handle.net/. . .] in your request.**"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/10477/83848"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["State University of New York at Buffalo"],"dc:rights":["Users of works found in University at Buffalo Institutional Repository (UBIR) are responsible for identifying and contacting the copyright owner for permission to reuse. University at Buffalo Libraries do not manage rights for copyright-protected works and cannot assist with permissions.","Copyright retained by author."],"dc:subject":["gender studies"],"dc:title":["Negotiating Around the CEDAW Norms and the Locally Grounded Knowledge(s): Kurdish and Turkish Women’s Mobilizations around International Monitoring Mechanisms"],"dc:type":["Text","Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:05:28Z"}