{"id":{"repo_id":"buffalo","oai_identifier":"oai:ubir.buffalo.edu:10477/79879"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/buffalo/oai:ubir.buffalo.edu:10477/79879","repository":{"repo_id":"buffalo","name":"Buffalo","base_url":"https://ubir.buffalo.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"A Theory of Consent","abstract":"Ph.D.","abstract_html":"Ph.D.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Monaghan, Jake"],"institution":"State University of New York at Buffalo","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Muldoon, Ryan","Philosophy"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-07-30T15:10:43Z","date_published":"2019-07-30T15:10:43Z","updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:05:19Z","subjects":["philosophy"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Users of works found in University at Buffalo Institutional Repository (UBIR) are responsible for identifying and contacting the copyright owner for permission to reuse. University at Buffalo Libraries do not manage rights for copyright-protected works and cannot assist with permissions.","Copyright retained by author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10477/79879","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Muldoon, Ryan","Philosophy"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Monaghan, Jake"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-07-30T15:10:43Z","2019","2019-04-27 22:28:41"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["State University of New York at Buffalo"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text","Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["philosophy"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Users of works found in University at Buffalo Institutional Repository (UBIR) are responsible for identifying and contacting the copyright owner for permission to reuse. University at Buffalo Libraries do not manage rights for copyright-protected works and cannot assist with permissions.","Copyright retained by author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10477/79879"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Ph.D.","This dissertation defends a robust, scalar theory of consent, and uses that theory of consent to rehabilitate consent theories of political legitimacy. To do so, I argue first that non-consent justifications of the power some exercise over others are second-best justifications. If possible, we should aim to secure (actual) consent. Consent in non-political contexts handles the problems of reasonable moral pluralism for justifying power. Second, I defend a “robust” theory of consent. This implies that mere acquiescence to political power does not justify it in the way that some think. Third, I argue that consent is scalar. Consent quality depends in part on scalar properties, and consent is morally transformative in proportion to its quality. I further develop the account of consent to explain the way that the information condition on valid consent varies from domain to domain. The explanation depends on distinguishing the kinds of informational obligations at play in a situation. Finally, I argue that the extant objections to consent theories of political legitimacy are undermined by the scalar theory of consent developed in this essay."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Theory of Consent"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Muldoon, Ryan","Philosophy"],"dc:creator":["Monaghan, Jake"],"dc:date":["2019-07-30T15:10:43Z","2019","2019-04-27 22:28:41"],"dc:description":["Ph.D.","This dissertation defends a robust, scalar theory of consent, and uses that theory of consent to rehabilitate consent theories of political legitimacy. To do so, I argue first that non-consent justifications of the power some exercise over others are second-best justifications. If possible, we should aim to secure (actual) consent. Consent in non-political contexts handles the problems of reasonable moral pluralism for justifying power. Second, I defend a “robust” theory of consent. This implies that mere acquiescence to political power does not justify it in the way that some think. Third, I argue that consent is scalar. Consent quality depends in part on scalar properties, and consent is morally transformative in proportion to its quality. I further develop the account of consent to explain the way that the information condition on valid consent varies from domain to domain. The explanation depends on distinguishing the kinds of informational obligations at play in a situation. Finally, I argue that the extant objections to consent theories of political legitimacy are undermined by the scalar theory of consent developed in this essay."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/10477/79879"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["State University of New York at Buffalo"],"dc:rights":["Users of works found in University at Buffalo Institutional Repository (UBIR) are responsible for identifying and contacting the copyright owner for permission to reuse. University at Buffalo Libraries do not manage rights for copyright-protected works and cannot assist with permissions.","Copyright retained by author."],"dc:subject":["philosophy"],"dc:title":["A Theory of Consent"],"dc:type":["Text","Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:05:19Z"}