{"id":{"repo_id":"bu","oai_identifier":"oai:open.bu.edu:2144/24358"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/bu/oai:open.bu.edu:2144/24358","repository":{"repo_id":"bu","name":"Boston University","base_url":"https://open.bu.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Risk-taking behavior of schizophrenics and normals","abstract":"The aims of this study were: (1) to test whether hypotheses regarding the behavior of schizophrenics which had received support in level of aspiration studies would also be supported by decision theory type chance taking measures; and (2) to examine the kinds of risks toward which schizophrenics were most sensitive. Two theoretical models, decision theory and level of aspiration theory, dealing with decision making in situations involving the threat of failure, were shown to be basically similar in their formulation; they differed, however, in regard to the independence of probability and reward, and the degree of the individual's control over the outcome and the motive of achievement. \"Risk,\" which was considered to be the objective equivalent of the clinical concept \"threat of failure,\" was defined operationally as the negative term of the expected value model (i.e., as the product of the probability of loss and the amount of possible loss). [TRUNCATED]","abstract_html":"The aims of this study were: (1) to test whether hypotheses regarding the behavior of schizophrenics which had received support in level of aspiration studies would also be supported by decision theory type chance taking measures; and (2) to examine the kinds of risks toward which schizophrenics were most sensitive. Two theoretical models, decision theory and level of aspiration theory, dealing with decision making in situations involving the threat of failure, were shown to be basically similar in their formulation; they differed, however, in regard to the independence of probability and reward, and the degree of the individual's control over the outcome and the motive of achievement. "Risk," which was considered to be the objective equivalent of the clinical concept "threat of failure," was defined operationally as the negative term of the expected value model (i.e., as the product of the probability of loss and the amount of possible loss). [TRUNCATED]","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Briggs, David Warren"],"institution":"Boston University","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1961,"date_issued":"1961","date_published":"1961","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:24:28Z","subjects":["Schizophrenics","Risk-taking (Psychology)"],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["Based on investigation of the BU Libraries' staff, this work is free of known copyright restrictions."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["b14686065"],"render_values":[{"text":"b14686065","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2144/24358","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Briggs, David Warren"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2017-11-01T12:34:06Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-11-01T12:34:06Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1961"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Boston University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis/Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Schizophrenics","Risk-taking (Psychology)"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Based on investigation of the BU Libraries' staff, this work is free of known copyright restrictions."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["b14686065"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2144/24358"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis (Ph.D)--Boston University."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The aims of this study were: (1) to test whether hypotheses regarding the behavior of schizophrenics which had received support in level of aspiration studies would also be supported by decision theory type chance taking measures; and (2) to examine the kinds of risks toward which schizophrenics were most sensitive. Two theoretical models, decision theory and level of aspiration theory, dealing with decision making in situations involving the threat of failure, were shown to be basically similar in their formulation; they differed, however, in regard to the independence of probability and reward, and the degree of the individual's control over the outcome and the motive of achievement. \"Risk,\" which was considered to be the objective equivalent of the clinical concept \"threat of failure,\" was defined operationally as the negative term of the expected value model (i.e., as the product of the probability of loss and the amount of possible loss). [TRUNCATED]"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Risk-taking behavior of schizophrenics and normals"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Briggs, David Warren"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2017-11-01T12:34:06Z"],"dc:date.available":["2017-11-01T12:34:06Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1961"],"dc:description":["Thesis (Ph.D)--Boston University."],"dc:description.abstract":["The aims of this study were: (1) to test whether hypotheses regarding the behavior of schizophrenics which had received support in level of aspiration studies would also be supported by decision theory type chance taking measures; and (2) to examine the kinds of risks toward which schizophrenics were most sensitive. Two theoretical models, decision theory and level of aspiration theory, dealing with decision making in situations involving the threat of failure, were shown to be basically similar in their formulation; they differed, however, in regard to the independence of probability and reward, and the degree of the individual's control over the outcome and the motive of achievement. \"Risk,\" which was considered to be the objective equivalent of the clinical concept \"threat of failure,\" was defined operationally as the negative term of the expected value model (i.e., as the product of the probability of loss and the amount of possible loss). [TRUNCATED]"],"dc:identifier.other":["b14686065"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/2144/24358"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["Boston University"],"dc:rights":["Based on investigation of the BU Libraries' staff, this work is free of known copyright restrictions."],"dc:subject":["Schizophrenics","Risk-taking (Psychology)"],"dc:title":["Risk-taking behavior of schizophrenics and normals"],"dc:type":["Thesis/Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:24:28Z"}