{"id":{"repo_id":"bryn-mawr","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.brynmawr.edu:dissertations-1122"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/bryn-mawr/oai:repository.brynmawr.edu:dissertations-1122","repository":{"repo_id":"bryn-mawr","name":"Bryn Mawr University","base_url":"https://repository.brynmawr.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"<i>Cangianti</i> and Shot Silk: Material Influence on Artistic Practice in Central Italian Painting from 1300 to 1550","abstract":"<p>In central Italian paintings from 1300 to 1550, “<em>cangianti</em>”—draperies modeled with two or more hues— have long been considered formal devices invented around the time of Giotto to compensate for a limited palette; rare instances of textural intent are thought to have occurred only towards the end of the period in question. Little serious consideration has been given to <em>seta cangiante</em> —shot silk, also known as iridescent or changeable silk—the actual fabric that shares its name and appearance with these fictional draperies.</p> <p>I have explored the relationship between <em>seta cangiante</em> and <em>cangianti</em> in paintings from three very different perspectives: the assumptions and linguistic errors that led to the original, misleading conclusions advanced by John Shearman, on which much subsequent scholarship was based; the philosophical arguments that purportedly deterred painters from mixing pigments to increase the range of colors available to them; and the presence and importance of silk in Italy during the late Middle Ages and the Renaissance.</p> <p>Chapter 2 examines prior scholarship, including significant contributions by Marcia B. Hall and John Gage, which reached a peak in 1990 when Michelangelo’s newly cleaned Sistine Chapel frescoes were revealed.</p> <p>Chapter 3 begins with a survey of ancient Greek concepts of color, especially those of Empedocles, Plato, Aristotle, and Theophrastus, whose ideas were inseparable from theories of sight. To gain a better understanding of their theories, I investigated color vision, color perception, and color naming. The hypotheses of Brent Berlin and Paul Kay shed light on the philosophers’ theories and on Apelles’ four-color palette as well, both of which influenced the practice and theory recorded centuries later by Cennino Cennini, Leon Battista Alberti, and Leonardo da Vinci.</p> <p>Chapter 4 traces the path of the<em> Bombyx mor</em>i silkworm from ancient China through Rome and Byzantium to the city-states of Italy. Beginning in the 13th century, <em>panni tartarici</em> found their way to Europe via Mongol envoys; these cloths of silk and gold inspired the industries in Lucca, Florence, and Venice to great heights of creativity and skill. The ambiguities surrounding certain cloth names, including <em>purpura</em>, are discussed in this chapter; <em>byssos</em> and <em>bukalamun</em> are treated separately in an appendix.</p> <p>In most cases, painted <em>cangiant</em>i represent <em>sete cangianti</em>. In the Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo transformed that equation from material to transcendent.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;In central Italian paintings from 1300 to 1550, “&lt;em&gt;cangianti&lt;/em&gt;”—draperies modeled with two or more hues— have long been considered formal devices invented around the time of Giotto to compensate for a limited palette; rare instances of textural intent are thought to have occurred only towards the end of the period in question. Little serious consideration has been given to &lt;em&gt;seta cangiante&lt;/em&gt; —shot silk, also known as iridescent or changeable silk—the actual fabric that shares its name and appearance with these fictional draperies.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I have explored the relationship between &lt;em&gt;seta cangiante&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;cangianti&lt;/em&gt; in paintings from three very different perspectives: the assumptions and linguistic errors that led to the original, misleading conclusions advanced by John Shearman, on which much subsequent scholarship was based; the philosophical arguments that purportedly deterred painters from mixing pigments to increase the range of colors available to them; and the presence and importance of silk in Italy during the late Middle Ages and the Renaissance.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Chapter 2 examines prior scholarship, including significant contributions by Marcia B. Hall and John Gage, which reached a peak in 1990 when Michelangelo’s newly cleaned Sistine Chapel frescoes were revealed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Chapter 3 begins with a survey of ancient Greek concepts of color, especially those of Empedocles, Plato, Aristotle, and Theophrastus, whose ideas were inseparable from theories of sight. To gain a better understanding of their theories, I investigated color vision, color perception, and color naming. The hypotheses of Brent Berlin and Paul Kay shed light on the philosophers’ theories and on Apelles’ four-color palette as well, both of which influenced the practice and theory recorded centuries later by Cennino Cennini, Leon Battista Alberti, and Leonardo da Vinci.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Chapter 4 traces the path of the&lt;em&gt; Bombyx mor&lt;/em&gt;i silkworm from ancient China through Rome and Byzantium to the city-states of Italy. Beginning in the 13th century, &lt;em&gt;panni tartarici&lt;/em&gt; found their way to Europe via Mongol envoys; these cloths of silk and gold inspired the industries in Lucca, Florence, and Venice to great heights of creativity and skill. The ambiguities surrounding certain cloth names, including &lt;em&gt;purpura&lt;/em&gt;, are discussed in this chapter; &lt;em&gt;byssos&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;bukalamun&lt;/em&gt; are treated separately in an appendix.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In most cases, painted &lt;em&gt;cangiant&lt;/em&gt;i represent &lt;em&gt;sete cangianti&lt;/em&gt;. In the Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo transformed that equation from material to transcendent.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Meier, Melissa Jane"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Bryn Mawr only","degree_discipline":"History of Art","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2015-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:23:46Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations/122","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Meier, Melissa Jane"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-05-15T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["History of Art"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Bryn Mawr only"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations/122"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>In central Italian paintings from 1300 to 1550, “<em>cangianti</em>”—draperies modeled with two or more hues— have long been considered formal devices invented around the time of Giotto to compensate for a limited palette; rare instances of textural intent are thought to have occurred only towards the end of the period in question. Little serious consideration has been given to <em>seta cangiante</em> —shot silk, also known as iridescent or changeable silk—the actual fabric that shares its name and appearance with these fictional draperies.</p> <p>I have explored the relationship between <em>seta cangiante</em> and <em>cangianti</em> in paintings from three very different perspectives: the assumptions and linguistic errors that led to the original, misleading conclusions advanced by John Shearman, on which much subsequent scholarship was based; the philosophical arguments that purportedly deterred painters from mixing pigments to increase the range of colors available to them; and the presence and importance of silk in Italy during the late Middle Ages and the Renaissance.</p> <p>Chapter 2 examines prior scholarship, including significant contributions by Marcia B. Hall and John Gage, which reached a peak in 1990 when Michelangelo’s newly cleaned Sistine Chapel frescoes were revealed.</p> <p>Chapter 3 begins with a survey of ancient Greek concepts of color, especially those of Empedocles, Plato, Aristotle, and Theophrastus, whose ideas were inseparable from theories of sight. To gain a better understanding of their theories, I investigated color vision, color perception, and color naming. The hypotheses of Brent Berlin and Paul Kay shed light on the philosophers’ theories and on Apelles’ four-color palette as well, both of which influenced the practice and theory recorded centuries later by Cennino Cennini, Leon Battista Alberti, and Leonardo da Vinci.</p> <p>Chapter 4 traces the path of the<em> Bombyx mor</em>i silkworm from ancient China through Rome and Byzantium to the city-states of Italy. Beginning in the 13th century, <em>panni tartarici</em> found their way to Europe via Mongol envoys; these cloths of silk and gold inspired the industries in Lucca, Florence, and Venice to great heights of creativity and skill. The ambiguities surrounding certain cloth names, including <em>purpura</em>, are discussed in this chapter; <em>byssos</em> and <em>bukalamun</em> are treated separately in an appendix.</p> <p>In most cases, painted <em>cangiant</em>i represent <em>sete cangianti</em>. In the Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo transformed that equation from material to transcendent.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["<i>Cangianti</i> and Shot Silk: Material Influence on Artistic Practice in Central Italian Painting from 1300 to 1550"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Meier, Melissa Jane"],"dc:date.available":["2015-05-15T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>In central Italian paintings from 1300 to 1550, “<em>cangianti</em>”—draperies modeled with two or more hues— have long been considered formal devices invented around the time of Giotto to compensate for a limited palette; rare instances of textural intent are thought to have occurred only towards the end of the period in question. Little serious consideration has been given to <em>seta cangiante</em> —shot silk, also known as iridescent or changeable silk—the actual fabric that shares its name and appearance with these fictional draperies.</p> <p>I have explored the relationship between <em>seta cangiante</em> and <em>cangianti</em> in paintings from three very different perspectives: the assumptions and linguistic errors that led to the original, misleading conclusions advanced by John Shearman, on which much subsequent scholarship was based; the philosophical arguments that purportedly deterred painters from mixing pigments to increase the range of colors available to them; and the presence and importance of silk in Italy during the late Middle Ages and the Renaissance.</p> <p>Chapter 2 examines prior scholarship, including significant contributions by Marcia B. Hall and John Gage, which reached a peak in 1990 when Michelangelo’s newly cleaned Sistine Chapel frescoes were revealed.</p> <p>Chapter 3 begins with a survey of ancient Greek concepts of color, especially those of Empedocles, Plato, Aristotle, and Theophrastus, whose ideas were inseparable from theories of sight. To gain a better understanding of their theories, I investigated color vision, color perception, and color naming. The hypotheses of Brent Berlin and Paul Kay shed light on the philosophers’ theories and on Apelles’ four-color palette as well, both of which influenced the practice and theory recorded centuries later by Cennino Cennini, Leon Battista Alberti, and Leonardo da Vinci.</p> <p>Chapter 4 traces the path of the<em> Bombyx mor</em>i silkworm from ancient China through Rome and Byzantium to the city-states of Italy. Beginning in the 13th century, <em>panni tartarici</em> found their way to Europe via Mongol envoys; these cloths of silk and gold inspired the industries in Lucca, Florence, and Venice to great heights of creativity and skill. The ambiguities surrounding certain cloth names, including <em>purpura</em>, are discussed in this chapter; <em>byssos</em> and <em>bukalamun</em> are treated separately in an appendix.</p> <p>In most cases, painted <em>cangiant</em>i represent <em>sete cangianti</em>. In the Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo transformed that equation from material to transcendent.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations/122"],"dc:title":["<i>Cangianti</i> and Shot Silk: Material Influence on Artistic Practice in Central Italian Painting from 1300 to 1550"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["History of Art"],"thesis:degree_level":["Bryn Mawr only"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:23:46Z"}