{"id":{"repo_id":"bryn-mawr","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.brynmawr.edu:dissertations-1044"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/bryn-mawr/oai:repository.brynmawr.edu:dissertations-1044","repository":{"repo_id":"bryn-mawr","name":"Bryn Mawr University","base_url":"https://repository.brynmawr.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"\"Ceausescu's Orphans\": Narrating the Crisis of Romanian International Child Adoption","abstract":"<p>Taking a constructivist approach, this study employs content and narrative analysis methods to study the politics of Romanian International Adoption policy. The study focuses on the crisis period of 2001-2004 which ended with a ban on Romanian International Adoption. Policy discourse is examined in the sending country (Romania)and the major receiving country (the U.S.), and in two institutional settings--governmental bodies and the press. I find that press reporting consistently reproduced interpretations endorsed by political elites, with the two interpretative frames of “child selling” and “child saving” assuming dominance in Romania and the U.S. respectively. Each framing metaphor reinforced politically biased ways of looking at International Adoption reflective of established interests in the respective countries; however, together they reinforced a shared discourse. Policy discourse served to mystify the underlying causes of the crisis of Romanian International Adoption and perpetuate denial about structural inequalities involving class, race, ethnicity, and nationality.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Taking a constructivist approach, this study employs content and narrative analysis methods to study the politics of Romanian International Adoption policy. The study focuses on the crisis period of 2001-2004 which ended with a ban on Romanian International Adoption. Policy discourse is examined in the sending country (Romania)and the major receiving country (the U.S.), and in two institutional settings--governmental bodies and the press. I find that press reporting consistently reproduced interpretations endorsed by political elites, with the two interpretative frames of “child selling” and “child saving” assuming dominance in Romania and the U.S. respectively. Each framing metaphor reinforced politically biased ways of looking at International Adoption reflective of established interests in the respective countries; however, together they reinforced a shared discourse. Policy discourse served to mystify the underlying causes of the crisis of Romanian International Adoption and perpetuate denial about structural inequalities involving class, race, ethnicity, and nationality.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Popa-Mabe, Melania C."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Bryn Mawr only","degree_discipline":"Social Work and Social Research","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2010-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:23:36Z","subjects":["Social Work"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations/45","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Popa-Mabe, Melania C."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Social Work and Social Research"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Bryn Mawr only"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Social Work"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations/45"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Taking a constructivist approach, this study employs content and narrative analysis methods to study the politics of Romanian International Adoption policy. The study focuses on the crisis period of 2001-2004 which ended with a ban on Romanian International Adoption. Policy discourse is examined in the sending country (Romania)and the major receiving country (the U.S.), and in two institutional settings--governmental bodies and the press. I find that press reporting consistently reproduced interpretations endorsed by political elites, with the two interpretative frames of “child selling” and “child saving” assuming dominance in Romania and the U.S. respectively. Each framing metaphor reinforced politically biased ways of looking at International Adoption reflective of established interests in the respective countries; however, together they reinforced a shared discourse. Policy discourse served to mystify the underlying causes of the crisis of Romanian International Adoption and perpetuate denial about structural inequalities involving class, race, ethnicity, and nationality.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["\"Ceausescu's Orphans\": Narrating the Crisis of Romanian International Child Adoption"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Popa-Mabe, Melania C."],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Taking a constructivist approach, this study employs content and narrative analysis methods to study the politics of Romanian International Adoption policy. The study focuses on the crisis period of 2001-2004 which ended with a ban on Romanian International Adoption. Policy discourse is examined in the sending country (Romania)and the major receiving country (the U.S.), and in two institutional settings--governmental bodies and the press. I find that press reporting consistently reproduced interpretations endorsed by political elites, with the two interpretative frames of “child selling” and “child saving” assuming dominance in Romania and the U.S. respectively. Each framing metaphor reinforced politically biased ways of looking at International Adoption reflective of established interests in the respective countries; however, together they reinforced a shared discourse. Policy discourse served to mystify the underlying causes of the crisis of Romanian International Adoption and perpetuate denial about structural inequalities involving class, race, ethnicity, and nationality.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations/45"],"dc:subject":["Social Work"],"dc:title":["\"Ceausescu's Orphans\": Narrating the Crisis of Romanian International Child Adoption"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Social Work and Social Research"],"thesis:degree_level":["Bryn Mawr only"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:23:36Z"}