{"id":{"repo_id":"brunel","oai_identifier":"oai:bura.brunel.ac.uk:2438/5251"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/brunel/oai:bura.brunel.ac.uk:2438/5251","repository":{"repo_id":"brunel","name":"University of Brunel","base_url":"https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Conceptual and cognitive problems in cybernetics","abstract":"Controversies have existed for some time about cybernetics as a subject and difficulties have existed for students in obtaining an overview despite the fact that at some level several cybernetics concepts can be grasped by twelve year olds. An attempt is made to unpack the notion of a subject entity and to indicate how far elements in cybernetics conform to such a concept within a generally acceptable philosophy of science. Ambiguities and controversies among key themes of cybernetics are examined and resolutions offered. How far the nature of cybernetics is likely to create problems of understanding is discussed, along with approaches towards the empirical examination of how cybernetic ideas are understood. An approach to better understanding is formulated and used in an investigation of how and how effectively the concept of feedback is grasped by various groups. Suggestions are offered from the foregoing analysis as to the balance of problems within cybernetics and effective strategies for the future.","abstract_html":"Controversies have existed for some time about cybernetics as a subject and difficulties have existed for students in obtaining an overview despite the fact that at some level several cybernetics concepts can be grasped by twelve year olds. An attempt is made to unpack the notion of a subject entity and to indicate how far elements in cybernetics conform to such a concept within a generally acceptable philosophy of science. Ambiguities and controversies among key themes of cybernetics are examined and resolutions offered. How far the nature of cybernetics is likely to create problems of understanding is discussed, along with approaches towards the empirical examination of how cybernetic ideas are understood. An approach to better understanding is formulated and used in an investigation of how and how effectively the concept of feedback is grasped by various groups. Suggestions are offered from the foregoing analysis as to the balance of problems within cybernetics and effective strategies for the future.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Dewhurst, David William"],"institution":"Brunel University Theses","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1990,"date_issued":"1990","date_published":"1990","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:23:26Z","subjects":["Ambiguity","Controversy","Resolution"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5251","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Dewhurst, David William"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2011-06-08T11:22:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2011-06-08T11:22:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1990"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Brunel University Theses"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Ambiguity","Controversy","Resolution"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5251"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Controversies have existed for some time about cybernetics as a subject and difficulties have existed for students in obtaining an overview despite the fact that at some level several cybernetics concepts can be grasped by twelve year olds. An attempt is made to unpack the notion of a subject entity and to indicate how far elements in cybernetics conform to such a concept within a generally acceptable philosophy of science. Ambiguities and controversies among key themes of cybernetics are examined and resolutions offered. How far the nature of cybernetics is likely to create problems of understanding is discussed, along with approaches towards the empirical examination of how cybernetic ideas are understood. An approach to better understanding is formulated and used in an investigation of how and how effectively the concept of feedback is grasped by various groups. Suggestions are offered from the foregoing analysis as to the balance of problems within cybernetics and effective strategies for the future."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Conceptual and cognitive problems in cybernetics"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Dewhurst, David William"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2011-06-08T11:22:29Z"],"dc:date.available":["2011-06-08T11:22:29Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1990"],"dc:description":["This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University."],"dc:description.abstract":["Controversies have existed for some time about cybernetics as a subject and difficulties have existed for students in obtaining an overview despite the fact that at some level several cybernetics concepts can be grasped by twelve year olds. An attempt is made to unpack the notion of a subject entity and to indicate how far elements in cybernetics conform to such a concept within a generally acceptable philosophy of science. Ambiguities and controversies among key themes of cybernetics are examined and resolutions offered. How far the nature of cybernetics is likely to create problems of understanding is discussed, along with approaches towards the empirical examination of how cybernetic ideas are understood. An approach to better understanding is formulated and used in an investigation of how and how effectively the concept of feedback is grasped by various groups. Suggestions are offered from the foregoing analysis as to the balance of problems within cybernetics and effective strategies for the future."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5251"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Brunel University Theses"],"dc:subject":["Ambiguity","Controversy","Resolution"],"dc:title":["Conceptual and cognitive problems in cybernetics"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:23:26Z"}