{"id":{"repo_id":"brockport","oai_identifier":"oai:soar.suny.edu:20.500.12648/4870"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/brockport/oai:soar.suny.edu:20.500.12648/4870","repository":{"repo_id":"brockport","name":"College at Brockport","base_url":"https://soar.suny.edu/oai/request/"},"display":{"title":"Critical Literacy in Literature Instruction: Canonical vs. Young Adult Literature","abstract":"Student populations are increasing in all forms of diversity: race, ethnicity, religion, socio-economics, gender, sexuality, ability, and more. They are becoming increasingly heterogenous. However, ELA literature curriculums remain largely homogenous. This is due to the fact that ELA classrooms typically teach from the traditional literary canon and text exemplars that contain mainly white, male, heterosexual, Christian, and physically- and mentally-abled authors and narratives. To counter the dominant narrative, educators can and should adapt a pedagogical approach to contemporary literature instruction that promotes critical literacy with paired canonical and young adult literature text sets and essential questions.","abstract_html":"Student populations are increasing in all forms of diversity: race, ethnicity, religion, socio-economics, gender, sexuality, ability, and more. They are becoming increasingly heterogenous. However, ELA literature curriculums remain largely homogenous. This is due to the fact that ELA classrooms typically teach from the traditional literary canon and text exemplars that contain mainly white, male, heterosexual, Christian, and physically- and mentally-abled authors and narratives. To counter the dominant narrative, educators can and should adapt a pedagogical approach to contemporary literature instruction that promotes critical literacy with paired canonical and young adult literature text sets and essential questions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kesel, Julia"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Miller, Cody"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-12-14","date_published":"2020-12-14","updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:01:52Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/4870","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Miller, Cody"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kesel, Julia"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2021-09-07T21:39:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2021-09-07T21:39:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2020-12-14"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["thesis"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/4870"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Student populations are increasing in all forms of diversity: race, ethnicity, religion, socio-economics, gender, sexuality, ability, and more. They are becoming increasingly heterogenous. However, ELA literature curriculums remain largely homogenous. This is due to the fact that ELA classrooms typically teach from the traditional literary canon and text exemplars that contain mainly white, male, heterosexual, Christian, and physically- and mentally-abled authors and narratives. To counter the dominant narrative, educators can and should adapt a pedagogical approach to contemporary literature instruction that promotes critical literacy with paired canonical and young adult literature text sets and essential questions."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Critical Literacy in Literature Instruction: Canonical vs. Young Adult Literature"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Miller, Cody"],"dc:creator":["Kesel, Julia"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2021-09-07T21:39:00Z"],"dc:date.available":["2021-09-07T21:39:00Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2020-12-14"],"dc:description.abstract":["Student populations are increasing in all forms of diversity: race, ethnicity, religion, socio-economics, gender, sexuality, ability, and more. They are becoming increasingly heterogenous. However, ELA literature curriculums remain largely homogenous. This is due to the fact that ELA classrooms typically teach from the traditional literary canon and text exemplars that contain mainly white, male, heterosexual, Christian, and physically- and mentally-abled authors and narratives. To counter the dominant narrative, educators can and should adapt a pedagogical approach to contemporary literature instruction that promotes critical literacy with paired canonical and young adult literature text sets and essential questions."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/4870"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:title":["Critical Literacy in Literature Instruction: Canonical vs. Young Adult Literature"],"dc:type":["thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:01:52Z"}