{"id":{"repo_id":"brock","oai_identifier":"oai:brocku.scholaris.ca:10464/5408"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/brock/oai:brocku.scholaris.ca:10464/5408","repository":{"repo_id":"brock","name":"Brock University","base_url":"https://brocku.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Examining Predictors of Quality of Life of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities After Deinstitutionalization","abstract":"This study examined if a person’s quality of life could be predicted by six relevant factors in a sample of 114 individuals with intellectual disability who had moved from institutional settings to community living settings within Ontario. Further, two aspects of self-efficacy were tested to see if they moderated the relationship between the possible predictors and the quality of life indicator. The initial multiple regression model accounted for a very small amount of the variance in the outcome (r2 = .08). The second analysis included decision-making as a predictor (r2 = .35) but did not find it to be moderator. The third analysis used opportunities for change as a predictor (r2 = .28), and as a moderator with two significant interaction terms, health and years in an institutional setting (r2 = .35). These findings support the often-theorized influence of self-efficacy on quality of life for individuals with intellectual disability.","abstract_html":"This study examined if a person’s quality of life could be predicted by six relevant factors in a sample of 114 individuals with intellectual disability who had moved from institutional settings to community living settings within Ontario. Further, two aspects of self-efficacy were tested to see if they moderated the relationship between the possible predictors and the quality of life indicator. The initial multiple regression model accounted for a very small amount of the variance in the outcome (r2 = .08). The second analysis included decision-making as a predictor (r2 = .35) but did not find it to be moderator. The third analysis used opportunities for change as a predictor (r2 = .28), and as a moderator with two significant interaction terms, health and years in an institutional setting (r2 = .35). These findings support the often-theorized influence of self-efficacy on quality of life for individuals with intellectual disability.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ireland, Lauren Marie"],"institution":"Brock University","degree_name":"M.A. Applied Disability Studies","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Faculty of Social Sciences","degree_department":"Center for Applied Disability Studies","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-05-02","date_published":"2014-05-02","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:23:20Z","subjects":["Intellectual Disability","Quality of Life","QOL","Life Quality","Deinstitutionalization","Community Homes","Community Living","Disability","Developmental Disability","Multiple Regression"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10464/5408","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Center for Applied Disability Studies"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ireland, Lauren Marie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-05-02T20:15:01Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-05-02T20:15:01Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2014-05-02"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Faculty of Social Sciences"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A. Applied Disability Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Brock University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Intellectual Disability","Quality of Life","QOL","Life Quality","Deinstitutionalization","Community Homes","Community Living","Disability","Developmental Disability","Multiple Regression"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10464/5408"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study examined if a person’s quality of life could be predicted by six relevant factors in a sample of 114 individuals with intellectual disability who had moved from institutional settings to community living settings within Ontario. Further, two aspects of self-efficacy were tested to see if they moderated the relationship between the possible predictors and the quality of life indicator. The initial multiple regression model accounted for a very small amount of the variance in the outcome (r2 = .08). The second analysis included decision-making as a predictor (r2 = .35) but did not find it to be moderator. The third analysis used opportunities for change as a predictor (r2 = .28), and as a moderator with two significant interaction terms, health and years in an institutional setting (r2 = .35). These findings support the often-theorized influence of self-efficacy on quality of life for individuals with intellectual disability."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Examining Predictors of Quality of Life of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities After Deinstitutionalization"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Center for Applied Disability Studies"],"dc:creator":["Ireland, Lauren Marie"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-05-02T20:15:01Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-05-02T20:15:01Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2014-05-02"],"dc:description.abstract":["This study examined if a person’s quality of life could be predicted by six relevant factors in a sample of 114 individuals with intellectual disability who had moved from institutional settings to community living settings within Ontario. Further, two aspects of self-efficacy were tested to see if they moderated the relationship between the possible predictors and the quality of life indicator. The initial multiple regression model accounted for a very small amount of the variance in the outcome (r2 = .08). The second analysis included decision-making as a predictor (r2 = .35) but did not find it to be moderator. The third analysis used opportunities for change as a predictor (r2 = .28), and as a moderator with two significant interaction terms, health and years in an institutional setting (r2 = .35). These findings support the often-theorized influence of self-efficacy on quality of life for individuals with intellectual disability."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10464/5408"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Intellectual Disability","Quality of Life","QOL","Life Quality","Deinstitutionalization","Community Homes","Community Living","Disability","Developmental Disability","Multiple Regression"],"dc:title":["Examining Predictors of Quality of Life of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities After Deinstitutionalization"],"dc:type":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Faculty of Social Sciences"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A. Applied Disability Studies"],"thesis:institution_name":["Brock University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:23:20Z"}