{"id":{"repo_id":"brock","oai_identifier":"oai:brocku.scholaris.ca:10464/2794"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/brock/oai:brocku.scholaris.ca:10464/2794","repository":{"repo_id":"brock","name":"Brock University","base_url":"https://brocku.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Utilitarianism and Buddist ethics: a comparative approach to the ethics of animal research","abstract":"This thesis explores the comparison utilitarianism and Buddhist ethics as they can be applied to animal research. It begins by examining some of the general discussions surrounding the use of animals in research. The historical views on the moral status of animals, the debate surrounding their use in animals, as well as the current 3R paradigm and its application in Canadian research are explored. The thesis then moves on to expound the moral system of utilitarianism as put forth by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, as well as contemporary additions to the system. It also looks at the basics of Buddhist ethics well distinguishing the Mahayana from the Therevada. Three case studies in animal research are used to explore how both systems can be applied to animal research. It then offers a comparison as to how both ethical systems function within the field of animal research and explores the implications in their application on its practice.","abstract_html":"This thesis explores the comparison utilitarianism and Buddhist ethics as they can be applied to animal research. It begins by examining some of the general discussions surrounding the use of animals in research. The historical views on the moral status of animals, the debate surrounding their use in animals, as well as the current 3R paradigm and its application in Canadian research are explored. The thesis then moves on to expound the moral system of utilitarianism as put forth by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, as well as contemporary additions to the system. It also looks at the basics of Buddhist ethics well distinguishing the Mahayana from the Therevada. Three case studies in animal research are used to explore how both systems can be applied to animal research. It then offers a comparison as to how both ethical systems function within the field of animal research and explores the implications in their application on its practice.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Watt, Sandra F."],"institution":"Brock University","degree_name":"M.A. Philosophy","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Faculty of Humanities","degree_department":"Department of Philosophy","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2006,"date_issued":"2006-11-04T14:55:06Z","date_published":"2006-11-04T14:55:06Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:23:16Z","subjects":["Utilitarianism.","Buddhist ethics.","Animal experimentation--Moral and ethical aspects.","Animal welfare--Moral and ethical aspects."],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10464/2794","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Department of Philosophy"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Watt, Sandra F."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2009-11-04T14:55:06Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2009-11-04T14:55:06Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2006-11-04T14:55:06Z"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Faculty of Humanities"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A. Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Brock University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Utilitarianism.","Buddhist ethics.","Animal experimentation--Moral and ethical aspects.","Animal welfare--Moral and ethical aspects."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10464/2794"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis explores the comparison utilitarianism and Buddhist ethics as they can be applied to animal research. It begins by examining some of the general discussions surrounding the use of animals in research. The historical views on the moral status of animals, the debate surrounding their use in animals, as well as the current 3R paradigm and its application in Canadian research are explored. The thesis then moves on to expound the moral system of utilitarianism as put forth by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, as well as contemporary additions to the system. It also looks at the basics of Buddhist ethics well distinguishing the Mahayana from the Therevada. Three case studies in animal research are used to explore how both systems can be applied to animal research. It then offers a comparison as to how both ethical systems function within the field of animal research and explores the implications in their application on its practice."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Utilitarianism and Buddist ethics: a comparative approach to the ethics of animal research"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Department of Philosophy"],"dc:creator":["Watt, Sandra F."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2009-11-04T14:55:06Z"],"dc:date.available":["2009-11-04T14:55:06Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2006-11-04T14:55:06Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis explores the comparison utilitarianism and Buddhist ethics as they can be applied to animal research. It begins by examining some of the general discussions surrounding the use of animals in research. The historical views on the moral status of animals, the debate surrounding their use in animals, as well as the current 3R paradigm and its application in Canadian research are explored. The thesis then moves on to expound the moral system of utilitarianism as put forth by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, as well as contemporary additions to the system. It also looks at the basics of Buddhist ethics well distinguishing the Mahayana from the Therevada. Three case studies in animal research are used to explore how both systems can be applied to animal research. It then offers a comparison as to how both ethical systems function within the field of animal research and explores the implications in their application on its practice."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10464/2794"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Utilitarianism.","Buddhist ethics.","Animal experimentation--Moral and ethical aspects.","Animal welfare--Moral and ethical aspects."],"dc:title":["Utilitarianism and Buddist ethics: a comparative approach to the ethics of animal research"],"dc:type":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Faculty of Humanities"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A. Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["Brock University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:23:16Z"}