{"id":{"repo_id":"brazil-ufrn","oai_identifier":"oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/21503"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/brazil-ufrn/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/21503","repository":{"repo_id":"brazil-ufrn","name":"Brazil UFRN","base_url":"https://repositorio.ufrn.br/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"O sistema prisional brasileiro frente à omissão estatal e ao estado de coisas inconstitucional: uma análise do controle jurisdicional de políticas públicas","abstract":"Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 has listed many guarantees to incarcerated persons deriving from the core of the principle of human dignity. However, analyzing the Brazilian prison system, can be found a bleak picture of repeated violations of fundamental rights. Then, the question is whether State´s omission, who failed to ensure the protection of the incarcerated persons rights, can configure what the Colombian Constitutional Court has defined as an "Unconstitutional State of Fairs". From finding potential inability of the government to remedy this massive and widespread violation of various fundamental rights rises the possibility of intervention by the judicial policy making related to the problem. We should not forget, however, that the principle of separation of powers advocates judicial action in these cases must be given just in an alternative way, only to supply the omission of other spheres of power, in order to give effect to the constitutional principles in question.","abstract_html":"Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 has listed many guarantees to incarcerated persons deriving from the core of the principle of human dignity. However, analyzing the Brazilian prison system, can be found a bleak picture of repeated violations of fundamental rights. Then, the question is whether State´s omission, who failed to ensure the protection of the incarcerated persons rights, can configure what the Colombian Constitutional Court has defined as an "Unconstitutional State of Fairs". From finding potential inability of the government to remedy this massive and widespread violation of various fundamental rights rises the possibility of intervention by the judicial policy making related to the problem. We should not forget, however, that the principle of separation of powers advocates judicial action in these cases must be given just in an alternative way, only to supply the omission of other spheres of power, in order to give effect to the constitutional principles in question.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Fagundes, Ricardo Antonio Menezes Cabral"],"institution":"Brasil","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-04-12","date_published":"2016-04-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:20:54Z","subjects":["Sistema prisional brasileiro","Princípio da dignidade humana","Omissão inconstitucional","Estado de coisas inconstitucional","Controle jurisdicional de política pública"],"languages":["por"],"rights":["Acesso Aberto"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21503","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Fagundes, Ricardo Antonio Menezes Cabral"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2016-12-26T15:56:20Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-12-26T15:56:20Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2016-04-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["masterThesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Sistema prisional brasileiro","Princípio da dignidade humana","Omissão inconstitucional","Estado de coisas inconstitucional","Controle jurisdicional de política pública"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["por"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Acesso Aberto"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21503"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 has listed many guarantees to incarcerated persons deriving from the core of the principle of human dignity. However, analyzing the Brazilian prison system, can be found a bleak picture of repeated violations of fundamental rights. Then, the question is whether State´s omission, who failed to ensure the protection of the incarcerated persons rights, can configure what the Colombian Constitutional Court has defined as an "Unconstitutional State of Fairs". From finding potential inability of the government to remedy this massive and widespread violation of various fundamental rights rises the possibility of intervention by the judicial policy making related to the problem. We should not forget, however, that the principle of separation of powers advocates judicial action in these cases must be given just in an alternative way, only to supply the omission of other spheres of power, in order to give effect to the constitutional principles in question."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["O sistema prisional brasileiro frente à omissão estatal e ao estado de coisas inconstitucional: uma análise do controle jurisdicional de políticas públicas"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Fagundes, Ricardo Antonio Menezes Cabral"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2016-12-26T15:56:20Z"],"dc:date.available":["2016-12-26T15:56:20Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2016-04-12"],"dc:description.abstract":["Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 has listed many guarantees to incarcerated persons deriving from the core of the principle of human dignity. However, analyzing the Brazilian prison system, can be found a bleak picture of repeated violations of fundamental rights. Then, the question is whether State´s omission, who failed to ensure the protection of the incarcerated persons rights, can configure what the Colombian Constitutional Court has defined as an "Unconstitutional State of Fairs". From finding potential inability of the government to remedy this massive and widespread violation of various fundamental rights rises the possibility of intervention by the judicial policy making related to the problem. We should not forget, however, that the principle of separation of powers advocates judicial action in these cases must be given just in an alternative way, only to supply the omission of other spheres of power, in order to give effect to the constitutional principles in question."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21503"],"dc:language":["por"],"dc:rights":["Acesso Aberto"],"dc:subject":["Sistema prisional brasileiro","Princípio da dignidade humana","Omissão inconstitucional","Estado de coisas inconstitucional","Controle jurisdicional de política pública"],"dc:title":["O sistema prisional brasileiro frente à omissão estatal e ao estado de coisas inconstitucional: uma análise do controle jurisdicional de políticas públicas"],"dc:type":["masterThesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:20:54Z"}