{"id":{"repo_id":"brazil-ufba","oai_identifier":"oai:repositorio.ufba.br:ri/33405"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/brazil-ufba/oai:repositorio.ufba.br:ri/33405","repository":{"repo_id":"brazil-ufba","name":"Brazil UFBA","base_url":"https://repositorio.ufba.br/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Rumo a uma Teoria Social Alternativa (T.S.A): as implicações do vitalismo nas ciências humanas e sociais","abstract":"Social Theory, as a constant flow of words and practices, has always undergone transformations, gaining new contours over time, just as a river adjusts its course depending on the geography of space. Its contemporary face is more radical, intense, often even acid, going far beyond what Jeffrey Alexander called a new theoretical movement, going beyond the simple commitment to the synthesis of categories. The transformations, at least recently, follow a decentered and rhizomatic pattern, without the rigidity and centrality that used to guide the sociological path. The purpose of this thesis, all stitched together in the format of an essay, is to understand a little this instant lived by Contemporary Social Theory, this kind of theoretical resumption, by perceiving its limits and its implications, resorting, at the same time, to the main works of the French sociologist Bruno Latour, such as \"Irreductions\", having as background the writings of Graham Harman and many other representatives of OOO (Object-Oriented Ontology). \"Irreductions\" is actually an appendix to the book \"Pasteurization of France\", published in 1984. With its 86 pages, accompanied by an aphorismatic tone, very close to Nietzsche’s, Latour makes apparent his link with Alternative Social Theory (A.S.T), taking up figures such as Spinoza, Deleuze, Whitehead, Gabriel Tarde and many others. As a consequence of this epistemological opening, of the overcoming of what Latour called transcendental sciences, a plurality of instances of meaning begins to claim ground in the sociological field, no longer suffocated by a single chain of signification. Social Theory, now, is no longer only the study of human interactions, opening space for other potentialities (or would it be virtualities?), including even inanimate beings, such as tables, laptops, cars, etc.","abstract_html":"Social Theory, as a constant flow of words and practices, has always undergone transformations, gaining new contours over time, just as a river adjusts its course depending on the geography of space. Its contemporary face is more radical, intense, often even acid, going far beyond what Jeffrey Alexander called a new theoretical movement, going beyond the simple commitment to the synthesis of categories. The transformations, at least recently, follow a decentered and rhizomatic pattern, without the rigidity and centrality that used to guide the sociological path. The purpose of this thesis, all stitched together in the format of an essay, is to understand a little this instant lived by Contemporary Social Theory, this kind of theoretical resumption, by perceiving its limits and its implications, resorting, at the same time, to the main works of the French sociologist Bruno Latour, such as "Irreductions", having as background the writings of Graham Harman and many other representatives of OOO (Object-Oriented Ontology). "Irreductions" is actually an appendix to the book "Pasteurization of France", published in 1984. With its 86 pages, accompanied by an aphorismatic tone, very close to Nietzsche’s, Latour makes apparent his link with Alternative Social Theory (A.S.T), taking up figures such as Spinoza, Deleuze, Whitehead, Gabriel Tarde and many others. As a consequence of this epistemological opening, of the overcoming of what Latour called transcendental sciences, a plurality of instances of meaning begins to claim ground in the sociological field, no longer suffocated by a single chain of signification. Social Theory, now, is no longer only the study of human interactions, opening space for other potentialities (or would it be virtualities?), including even inanimate beings, such as tables, laptops, cars, etc.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Pinho, Thiago de Araujo"],"institution":"Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Mocellim, Alan Delazeri"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-04-09","date_published":"2021-04-09","updated_at":"2026-07-27T22:07:47Z","subjects":["Teoria Social","Sociologia","Bruno Latour","Graham Harman","Ontologia","Filosofia"],"languages":["pt_BR"],"rights":["Acesso Aberto"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["tese"],"render_values":[{"text":"tese","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/33405","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Mocellim, Alan Delazeri"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Pinho, Thiago de Araujo"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2021-05-12T03:20:47Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2021-05-12T03:20:47Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2021-04-09"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Tese"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Teoria Social","Sociologia","Bruno Latour","Graham Harman","Ontologia","Filosofia"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["pt_BR"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Acesso Aberto"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["tese"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/33405"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Social Theory, as a constant flow of words and practices, has always undergone transformations, gaining new contours over time, just as a river adjusts its course depending on the geography of space. Its contemporary face is more radical, intense, often even acid, going far beyond what Jeffrey Alexander called a new theoretical movement, going beyond the simple commitment to the synthesis of categories. The transformations, at least recently, follow a decentered and rhizomatic pattern, without the rigidity and centrality that used to guide the sociological path. The purpose of this thesis, all stitched together in the format of an essay, is to understand a little this instant lived by Contemporary Social Theory, this kind of theoretical resumption, by perceiving its limits and its implications, resorting, at the same time, to the main works of the French sociologist Bruno Latour, such as \"Irreductions\", having as background the writings of Graham Harman and many other representatives of OOO (Object-Oriented Ontology). \"Irreductions\" is actually an appendix to the book \"Pasteurization of France\", published in 1984. With its 86 pages, accompanied by an aphorismatic tone, very close to Nietzsche’s, Latour makes apparent his link with Alternative Social Theory (A.S.T), taking up figures such as Spinoza, Deleuze, Whitehead, Gabriel Tarde and many others. As a consequence of this epistemological opening, of the overcoming of what Latour called transcendental sciences, a plurality of instances of meaning begins to claim ground in the sociological field, no longer suffocated by a single chain of signification. Social Theory, now, is no longer only the study of human interactions, opening space for other potentialities (or would it be virtualities?), including even inanimate beings, such as tables, laptops, cars, etc."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Rumo a uma Teoria Social Alternativa (T.S.A): as implicações do vitalismo nas ciências humanas e sociais"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Mocellim, Alan Delazeri"],"dc:creator":["Pinho, Thiago de Araujo"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2021-05-12T03:20:47Z"],"dc:date.available":["2021-05-12T03:20:47Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2021-04-09"],"dc:description.abstract":["Social Theory, as a constant flow of words and practices, has always undergone transformations, gaining new contours over time, just as a river adjusts its course depending on the geography of space. Its contemporary face is more radical, intense, often even acid, going far beyond what Jeffrey Alexander called a new theoretical movement, going beyond the simple commitment to the synthesis of categories. The transformations, at least recently, follow a decentered and rhizomatic pattern, without the rigidity and centrality that used to guide the sociological path. The purpose of this thesis, all stitched together in the format of an essay, is to understand a little this instant lived by Contemporary Social Theory, this kind of theoretical resumption, by perceiving its limits and its implications, resorting, at the same time, to the main works of the French sociologist Bruno Latour, such as \"Irreductions\", having as background the writings of Graham Harman and many other representatives of OOO (Object-Oriented Ontology). \"Irreductions\" is actually an appendix to the book \"Pasteurization of France\", published in 1984. With its 86 pages, accompanied by an aphorismatic tone, very close to Nietzsche’s, Latour makes apparent his link with Alternative Social Theory (A.S.T), taking up figures such as Spinoza, Deleuze, Whitehead, Gabriel Tarde and many others. As a consequence of this epistemological opening, of the overcoming of what Latour called transcendental sciences, a plurality of instances of meaning begins to claim ground in the sociological field, no longer suffocated by a single chain of signification. Social Theory, now, is no longer only the study of human interactions, opening space for other potentialities (or would it be virtualities?), including even inanimate beings, such as tables, laptops, cars, etc."],"dc:identifier.other":["tese"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/33405"],"dc:language.iso":["pt_BR"],"dc:rights":["Acesso Aberto"],"dc:subject":["Teoria Social","Sociologia","Bruno Latour","Graham Harman","Ontologia","Filosofia"],"dc:title":["Rumo a uma Teoria Social Alternativa (T.S.A): as implicações do vitalismo nas ciências humanas e sociais"],"dc:type":["Tese"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T22:07:47Z"}