{"id":{"repo_id":"brazil-uerj","oai_identifier":"oai:pantheon.ufrj.br:11422/6645"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/brazil-uerj/oai:pantheon.ufrj.br:11422/6645","repository":{"repo_id":"brazil-uerj","name":"Brazil UERJ","base_url":"https://pantheon.ufrj.br/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"O bom e o mau professor na ótica dos estudantes dos níveis de ensino fundamental, médio e de graduação","abstract":"The predominant categories in the students' good and bad teachers classification in ali school leveis studied was \"Descriptions of the teaching process\", \"Physical and personal characteristics of a teacher\" and \"Quality of relationship between teacher and student\", always in this arder. ln ali situations studied, this group of categories represented 90% of the total students responses. This result led to a perception of this group of categories importance in the good and bad teacher classification. No correspondence has be found between the student preferences of their teachers and the teachers subject. So it is possible to suggest that the students preference was related to the teaching way instead the subject taught. Then the teachers communication capacity stands out distinctly because permits to the teacher constructs a significant communication process in his/her classes with effective learning by the students. The good teacher qualities seems possible trainable and although the teachers work could be enriched by refined equipment for the schools that improve considerably the learning process the teachers characteristics should more important to the success of learning process. At first view it was no correspondence between teachers sex by pupils sex and the good and bad teachers classification.","abstract_html":"The predominant categories in the students' good and bad teachers classification in ali school leveis studied was "Descriptions of the teaching process", "Physical and personal characteristics of a teacher" and "Quality of relationship between teacher and student", always in this arder. ln ali situations studied, this group of categories represented 90% of the total students responses. This result led to a perception of this group of categories importance in the good and bad teacher classification. No correspondence has be found between the student preferences of their teachers and the teachers subject. So it is possible to suggest that the students preference was related to the teaching way instead the subject taught. Then the teachers communication capacity stands out distinctly because permits to the teacher constructs a significant communication process in his/her classes with effective learning by the students. The good teacher qualities seems possible trainable and although the teachers work could be enriched by refined equipment for the schools that improve considerably the learning process the teachers characteristics should more important to the success of learning process. At first view it was no correspondence between teachers sex by pupils sex and the good and bad teachers classification.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Pereira, Marcia Rodrigues"],"institution":"Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Foguel, Debora"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2001,"date_issued":"2001","date_published":"2001","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:16:24Z","subjects":["Educação","Formação de professores","Avaliação da aprendizagem","Biologia","Ensino de ciências","Ensino e Aprendizagem"],"languages":["por"],"rights":["Acesso Aberto"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11422/6645","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Foguel, Debora"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Pereira, Marcia Rodrigues"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2019-03-12T02:46:15Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2026-05-16T03:04:56Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2001"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Instituto de Bioquimica Médica Leopoldo De Meis"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertação"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Educação","Formação de professores","Avaliação da aprendizagem","Biologia","Ensino de ciências","Ensino e Aprendizagem"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["por"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Acesso Aberto"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11422/6645"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The predominant categories in the students' good and bad teachers classification in ali school leveis studied was \"Descriptions of the teaching process\", \"Physical and personal characteristics of a teacher\" and \"Quality of relationship between teacher and student\", always in this arder. ln ali situations studied, this group of categories represented 90% of the total students responses. This result led to a perception of this group of categories importance in the good and bad teacher classification. No correspondence has be found between the student preferences of their teachers and the teachers subject. So it is possible to suggest that the students preference was related to the teaching way instead the subject taught. Then the teachers communication capacity stands out distinctly because permits to the teacher constructs a significant communication process in his/her classes with effective learning by the students. The good teacher qualities seems possible trainable and although the teachers work could be enriched by refined equipment for the schools that improve considerably the learning process the teachers characteristics should more important to the success of learning process. At first view it was no correspondence between teachers sex by pupils sex and the good and bad teachers classification."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["O bom e o mau professor na ótica dos estudantes dos níveis de ensino fundamental, médio e de graduação"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Foguel, Debora"],"dc:creator":["Pereira, Marcia Rodrigues"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2019-03-12T02:46:15Z"],"dc:date.available":["2026-05-16T03:04:56Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2001"],"dc:description.abstract":["The predominant categories in the students' good and bad teachers classification in ali school leveis studied was \"Descriptions of the teaching process\", \"Physical and personal characteristics of a teacher\" and \"Quality of relationship between teacher and student\", always in this arder. ln ali situations studied, this group of categories represented 90% of the total students responses. This result led to a perception of this group of categories importance in the good and bad teacher classification. No correspondence has be found between the student preferences of their teachers and the teachers subject. So it is possible to suggest that the students preference was related to the teaching way instead the subject taught. Then the teachers communication capacity stands out distinctly because permits to the teacher constructs a significant communication process in his/her classes with effective learning by the students. The good teacher qualities seems possible trainable and although the teachers work could be enriched by refined equipment for the schools that improve considerably the learning process the teachers characteristics should more important to the success of learning process. At first view it was no correspondence between teachers sex by pupils sex and the good and bad teachers classification."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11422/6645"],"dc:language":["por"],"dc:publisher":["Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro"],"dc:publisher.department":["Instituto de Bioquimica Médica Leopoldo De Meis"],"dc:rights":["Acesso Aberto"],"dc:subject":["Educação","Formação de professores","Avaliação da aprendizagem","Biologia","Ensino de ciências","Ensino e Aprendizagem"],"dc:title":["O bom e o mau professor na ótica dos estudantes dos níveis de ensino fundamental, médio e de graduação"],"dc:type":["Dissertação"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:16:24Z"}