{"id":{"repo_id":"bradford","oai_identifier":"oai:bradscholars.brad.ac.uk:10454/20939"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/bradford/oai:bradscholars.brad.ac.uk:10454/20939","repository":{"repo_id":"bradford","name":"University of Bradford","base_url":"https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Post-Saddam Iraq: Caught Between Iran and Saudi Arabia Strategic Rivalry","abstract":"This thesis explores the complex rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia in postSaddam Iraq, particularly focusing on the period from 2010 to 2014. To capture the complexity of this rivalry, the thesis develops a conceptual framework based on foreign policy analysis, rivalry studies, and international relations theories. Drawing on this framework, it first discusses the determinants of this rivalry at different levels of analysis. Within individual levels of analysis, the key leaders’ personalities will be reviewed. At the group level of analysis, factors such as formal groups and informal networks are studied. At the state level of analysis, a variety of domestic political institutions are considered, including state structures and institutions. At the system level, grand theories about the regional balance of power are unravelled. The ideational factors have also been taken into consideration at different levels of analysis. The thesis also focuses on the actual behaviour of Iran and Saudi Arabia towards Iraq. It considers a variety of foreign policies, ranging from hard power to soft power tools. It discusses how the two countries tried to manipulate the election results in Iraq as well as broker post-election coalition-building to assure that whichever group wins elections will be loyal to them. It also considers the economic weapons, clandestine intelligence, and military support used by Iran and Saudi Arabia in Iraq. It has gone beyond the state level of analysis to explain how events such as the Arab Spring influenced this rivalry. ideational factors have also been taken into consideration at different levels of analysis.","abstract_html":"This thesis explores the complex rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia in postSaddam Iraq, particularly focusing on the period from 2010 to 2014. To capture the complexity of this rivalry, the thesis develops a conceptual framework based on foreign policy analysis, rivalry studies, and international relations theories. Drawing on this framework, it first discusses the determinants of this rivalry at different levels of analysis. Within individual levels of analysis, the key leaders’ personalities will be reviewed. At the group level of analysis, factors such as formal groups and informal networks are studied. At the state level of analysis, a variety of domestic political institutions are considered, including state structures and institutions. At the system level, grand theories about the regional balance of power are unravelled. The ideational factors have also been taken into consideration at different levels of analysis. The thesis also focuses on the actual behaviour of Iran and Saudi Arabia towards Iraq. It considers a variety of foreign policies, ranging from hard power to soft power tools. It discusses how the two countries tried to manipulate the election results in Iraq as well as broker post-election coalition-building to assure that whichever group wins elections will be loyal to them. It also considers the economic weapons, clandestine intelligence, and military support used by Iran and Saudi Arabia in Iraq. It has gone beyond the state level of analysis to explain how events such as the Arab Spring influenced this rivalry. ideational factors have also been taken into consideration at different levels of analysis.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Abdullah, Hayder H."],"institution":"University of Bradford","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Whitby, Simon M."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":null,"date_issued":"","date_published":null,"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:13:22Z","subjects":["Iran","Saudi Arabia","Strategic rivalry","Rivalry in Iraq","Foreign policy determinants","Foreign policy tools","Post Saddam Iraq","Iraq elections"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["<a rel=\"license\" href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/\"><img alt=\"Creative Commons License\" style=\"border-width:0\" src=\"http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png\" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel=\"license\" href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/\">Creative Commons Licence</a>."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/handle/10454/20939","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Whitby, Simon M."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Abdullah, Hayder H."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-06-10T10:26:49Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2026-06-10T10:26:49Z"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["School of Social Sciences. Faculty of Management, Law and Social Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Bradford"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["PhD"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Iran","Saudi Arabia","Strategic rivalry","Rivalry in Iraq","Foreign policy determinants","Foreign policy tools","Post Saddam Iraq","Iraq elections"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["<a rel=\"license\" href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/\"><img alt=\"Creative Commons License\" style=\"border-width:0\" src=\"http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png\" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel=\"license\" href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/\">Creative Commons Licence</a>."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/handle/10454/20939"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis explores the complex rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia in postSaddam Iraq, particularly focusing on the period from 2010 to 2014. To capture the complexity of this rivalry, the thesis develops a conceptual framework based on foreign policy analysis, rivalry studies, and international relations theories. Drawing on this framework, it first discusses the determinants of this rivalry at different levels of analysis. Within individual levels of analysis, the key leaders’ personalities will be reviewed. At the group level of analysis, factors such as formal groups and informal networks are studied. At the state level of analysis, a variety of domestic political institutions are considered, including state structures and institutions. At the system level, grand theories about the regional balance of power are unravelled. The ideational factors have also been taken into consideration at different levels of analysis. The thesis also focuses on the actual behaviour of Iran and Saudi Arabia towards Iraq. It considers a variety of foreign policies, ranging from hard power to soft power tools. It discusses how the two countries tried to manipulate the election results in Iraq as well as broker post-election coalition-building to assure that whichever group wins elections will be loyal to them. It also considers the economic weapons, clandestine intelligence, and military support used by Iran and Saudi Arabia in Iraq. It has gone beyond the state level of analysis to explain how events such as the Arab Spring influenced this rivalry. ideational factors have also been taken into consideration at different levels of analysis."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Post-Saddam Iraq: Caught Between Iran and Saudi Arabia Strategic Rivalry"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Whitby, Simon M."],"dc:creator":["Abdullah, Hayder H."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-06-10T10:26:49Z"],"dc:date.available":["2026-06-10T10:26:49Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis explores the complex rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia in postSaddam Iraq, particularly focusing on the period from 2010 to 2014. To capture the complexity of this rivalry, the thesis develops a conceptual framework based on foreign policy analysis, rivalry studies, and international relations theories. Drawing on this framework, it first discusses the determinants of this rivalry at different levels of analysis. Within individual levels of analysis, the key leaders’ personalities will be reviewed. At the group level of analysis, factors such as formal groups and informal networks are studied. At the state level of analysis, a variety of domestic political institutions are considered, including state structures and institutions. At the system level, grand theories about the regional balance of power are unravelled. The ideational factors have also been taken into consideration at different levels of analysis. The thesis also focuses on the actual behaviour of Iran and Saudi Arabia towards Iraq. It considers a variety of foreign policies, ranging from hard power to soft power tools. It discusses how the two countries tried to manipulate the election results in Iraq as well as broker post-election coalition-building to assure that whichever group wins elections will be loyal to them. It also considers the economic weapons, clandestine intelligence, and military support used by Iran and Saudi Arabia in Iraq. It has gone beyond the state level of analysis to explain how events such as the Arab Spring influenced this rivalry. ideational factors have also been taken into consideration at different levels of analysis."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/handle/10454/20939"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher.department":["School of Social Sciences. Faculty of Management, Law and Social Sciences"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Bradford"],"dc:rights":["<a rel=\"license\" href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/\"><img alt=\"Creative Commons License\" style=\"border-width:0\" src=\"http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png\" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel=\"license\" href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/\">Creative Commons Licence</a>."],"dc:subject":["Iran","Saudi Arabia","Strategic rivalry","Rivalry in Iraq","Foreign policy determinants","Foreign policy tools","Post Saddam Iraq","Iraq elections"],"dc:title":["Post-Saddam Iraq: Caught Between Iran and Saudi Arabia Strategic Rivalry"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["PhD"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:13:22Z"}