The function of duality and trinity in the structure of Piers Plowman

<p>Dualities and trinities are everywhere in the poem, sometimes conflicting, sometimes not. They govern the poem in its largest structures, overarching the entire poem, and its smallest, often evoking an additional level of meaning in just a phrase. These groupings of two and three are not ornamental or arbitrary, but thematic; the meanings of the poem are inextricably bound up in them. It will be necessary,therefore, in what follows, to discuss meaning (theme) as much as structure. The meaning of Dobest, for instance, is dependent upon its being the third part of a trinity. The other two parts must in turn be dealt with, not as independent, dramatic sections of the poem, but as parts of a greater three~fold structure. Dobest, then, must be seen as, not just another Do or as the logical end of a progressive journey, but as the third part of a trinity, resembling in some way the third Member of the divine Trinity and His attributes. In the same way, it will be necessary to discuss, for instance, the meaning of hope so that its place in the triad, faith, hope, and charity, becomes clearer. The end, however, of the consideration of any of the poem's concepts, virtues, faculties, etc. will be the fitting together of theme and structure in an effort to see the poem more clearly as a whole.</p>

Name thesis:degree_name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Level thesis:degree_level

Dissertation

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

English, General Literature, and Rhetoric

Year

1974

Author dc:creator

• Arn, Mary-Jo

Contributors dc:contributor

• Bernard F. Huppe
• Robin Oggins
• Bernard S. Levy

• Langland
• William
• Piers Plowman
• Middle English
• 1100-1500
• English poetry
• Criticism and interpretation
• Trinity in literature

Repository record dc:identifier

https://orb.binghamton.edu/dissertation_and_theses/218

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:orb.binghamton.edu:dissertation_and_theses-1224