Few scholars of the Poetics are fully aware of the fact that the post-Classical history of the treatise begins in the Arabic Middle East. In the early tenth century A.D. the Poetics was translated into Arabic and, as I try to establish in this study, it was translated at least once more later in the century. Major Arabic philosophers took up the task of trying to explain, comment on, or adapt the tenets of the treatise. Of these efforts, some are extant, others are lost. Of those extant, we have the brief treatise by al-Fārābī (\"The Canons of Poetry\") which echoes the Poetics in some ways but is in the main derivative from apocryphal sources. Two commentaries are representative of a more intensive effort to render the tenets of the treatise in the form of summary, interpretation or adaptation. The first is by Avicenna, and the second by Averroes.
Chronologically and substantially, Avicenna's Commentary has the central place in the Medieval Arabic tradition of the Poetics. In this study, I have tried to achieve two aims. In the first part, I have attempted to study Avicenna's Commentary in order to establish its historical background—the factors that contributed to or influenced its composition—and the point of view from which Avicenna approached the Poetics. This, I believe, is requisite for understanding some of the peculiar characteristics of the Commentary, e.g., the pseudo-Aristotelian elements in it and the perspective through which Avicenna saw the Poetics.
In the second part, I have tried to present a translation of the Commentary—something that has not been done so far in any modern language. In this translation, I strived to be both accurate and mindful of the English reader, especially the one who is familiar with the Poetics only in its English versions. In the notes to the translation, I have explained Avicenna's departures from the Aristotelian text as well as some of the rather obscure points which result either from Avicenna's extremely technical language or from the inadequacy of his sources.
","abstract_html":"<p>Few scholars of the <em>Poetics</em> are fully aware of the fact that the post-Classical history of the treatise begins in the Arabic Middle East. In the early tenth century A.D. the <em>Poetics</em> was translated into Arabic and, as I try to establish in this study, it was translated at least once more later in the century. Major Arabic philosophers took up the task of trying to explain, comment on, or adapt the tenets of the treatise. Of these efforts, some are extant, others are lost. Of those extant, we have the brief treatise by al-Fārābī ("The Canons of Poetry") which echoes the <em>Poetics</em> in some ways but is in the main derivative from apocryphal sources. Two commentaries are representative of a more intensive effort to render the tenets of the treatise in the form of summary, interpretation or adaptation. The first is by Avicenna, and the second by Averroes.</p> <p>Chronologically and substantially, Avicenna's Commentary has the central place in the Medieval Arabic tradition of the <em>Poetics</em>. In this study, I have tried to achieve two aims. In the first part, I have attempted to study Avicenna's Commentary in order to establish its historical background—the factors that contributed to or influenced its composition—and the point of view from which Avicenna approached the <em>Poetics</em>. This, I believe, is requisite for understanding some of the peculiar characteristics of the Commentary, e.g., the pseudo-Aristotelian elements in it and the perspective through which Avicenna saw the <em>Poetics</em>.</p> <p>In the second part, I have tried to present a translation of the Commentary—something that has not been done so far in any modern language. In this translation, I strived to be both accurate and mindful of the English reader, especially the one who is familiar with the <em>Poetics</em> only in its English versions. In the notes to the translation, I have explained Avicenna's departures from the Aristotelian text as well as some of the rather obscure points which result either from Avicenna's extremely technical language or from the inadequacy of his sources.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Dahiyat, Ismail M."],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"English, General Literature, and Rhetoric","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Seymour M. Pitcher","Mario A. Di Cesare","Bernard F. Huppé"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1972,"date_issued":"1972-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"1972-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:10:35Z","subjects":["Aristotle","Poetics","Poetry","Early works to 1800","al-Shiʻr"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://orb.binghamton.edu/dissertation_and_theses/173","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Seymour M. Pitcher","Mario A. Di Cesare","Bernard F. Huppé"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Dahiyat, Ismail M."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["English, General Literature, and Rhetoric"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Aristotle","Poetics","Poetry","Early works to 1800","al-Shiʻr"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://orb.binghamton.edu/dissertation_and_theses/173"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Few scholars of the Poetics are fully aware of the fact that the post-Classical history of the treatise begins in the Arabic Middle East. In the early tenth century A.D. the Poetics was translated into Arabic and, as I try to establish in this study, it was translated at least once more later in the century. Major Arabic philosophers took up the task of trying to explain, comment on, or adapt the tenets of the treatise. Of these efforts, some are extant, others are lost. Of those extant, we have the brief treatise by al-Fārābī (\"The Canons of Poetry\") which echoes the Poetics in some ways but is in the main derivative from apocryphal sources. Two commentaries are representative of a more intensive effort to render the tenets of the treatise in the form of summary, interpretation or adaptation. The first is by Avicenna, and the second by Averroes.
Chronologically and substantially, Avicenna's Commentary has the central place in the Medieval Arabic tradition of the Poetics. In this study, I have tried to achieve two aims. In the first part, I have attempted to study Avicenna's Commentary in order to establish its historical background—the factors that contributed to or influenced its composition—and the point of view from which Avicenna approached the Poetics. This, I believe, is requisite for understanding some of the peculiar characteristics of the Commentary, e.g., the pseudo-Aristotelian elements in it and the perspective through which Avicenna saw the Poetics.
In the second part, I have tried to present a translation of the Commentary—something that has not been done so far in any modern language. In this translation, I strived to be both accurate and mindful of the English reader, especially the one who is familiar with the Poetics only in its English versions. In the notes to the translation, I have explained Avicenna's departures from the Aristotelian text as well as some of the rather obscure points which result either from Avicenna's extremely technical language or from the inadequacy of his sources.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Avicenna's Commentary on the Poetics of Aristotle: a critical study with an annotated translation of the text"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Seymour M. Pitcher","Mario A. Di Cesare","Bernard F. Huppé"],"dc:creator":["Dahiyat, Ismail M."],"dc:description.abstract":["Few scholars of the Poetics are fully aware of the fact that the post-Classical history of the treatise begins in the Arabic Middle East. In the early tenth century A.D. the Poetics was translated into Arabic and, as I try to establish in this study, it was translated at least once more later in the century. Major Arabic philosophers took up the task of trying to explain, comment on, or adapt the tenets of the treatise. Of these efforts, some are extant, others are lost. Of those extant, we have the brief treatise by al-Fārābī (\"The Canons of Poetry\") which echoes the Poetics in some ways but is in the main derivative from apocryphal sources. Two commentaries are representative of a more intensive effort to render the tenets of the treatise in the form of summary, interpretation or adaptation. The first is by Avicenna, and the second by Averroes.
Chronologically and substantially, Avicenna's Commentary has the central place in the Medieval Arabic tradition of the Poetics. In this study, I have tried to achieve two aims. In the first part, I have attempted to study Avicenna's Commentary in order to establish its historical background—the factors that contributed to or influenced its composition—and the point of view from which Avicenna approached the Poetics. This, I believe, is requisite for understanding some of the peculiar characteristics of the Commentary, e.g., the pseudo-Aristotelian elements in it and the perspective through which Avicenna saw the Poetics.
In the second part, I have tried to present a translation of the Commentary—something that has not been done so far in any modern language. In this translation, I strived to be both accurate and mindful of the English reader, especially the one who is familiar with the Poetics only in its English versions. In the notes to the translation, I have explained Avicenna's departures from the Aristotelian text as well as some of the rather obscure points which result either from Avicenna's extremely technical language or from the inadequacy of his sources.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://orb.binghamton.edu/dissertation_and_theses/173"],"dc:subject":["Aristotle","Poetics","Poetry","Early works to 1800","al-Shiʻr"],"dc:title":["Avicenna's Commentary on the Poetics of Aristotle: a critical study with an annotated translation of the text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["English, General Literature, and Rhetoric"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:10:35Z"}