Back to results

Baylor University.

Fitzgerald, Lewis, Wharton, Anderson, and individual-community conflict in the 1920 American novel.

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

1920 saw an eruption of significant American novels portraying conflicts between individuals and community norms. These tensions between individuals and their families, churches, social classes, and towns, for example, conveyed the Progressive-era antagonisms toward civil society. In their constructivist approach to society, Progressives believed that "they could reshape character by reshaping the environment," writes historian Michael McGerr (81). They favored national, disinterested, and enlightened solutions to the economic and social problems associated with Gilded Age industrialism, and criticized local and traditional authority structures for being provincial, pecuniary, and conformist. Contemporary critic Carl Van Doren referred to the outburst of literature on this theme as "The Revolt from the Village," for its criticism of "[t]he traditions which once might have governed" and "no longer hold" (412). Among these works were F. Scott Fitzgerald's This Side of Paradise, Edith Wharton's The Age of Innocence, Sherwood Anderson's Poor White, and Sinclair Lewis's Main Street. Characters in these novels are alienated from groups like family, church, class, and village. Such communities are considered intermediate associations because they intervene between individuals and government power. Sociologist Robert Nisbet highlighted their importance for the well being of individuals and society in his book The Quest for Community (1953). He stated, "The modern release of the individual from traditional ties of class, religion, and kinship has made him free; but on the testimony of innumerable works in our age, this freedom is accompanied not by the sense of creative release but by the sense of disenchantment and alienation" (7). Indeed, to the degree the characters in these works disengage from the moral influence of social bonds, their senses of belonging and purpose are diminished. In contrast, the characters that become more interdependent in their traditional communities are consistently well adjusted with regard to their individuality and objectives. This dissertation examines the Progressive-era milieu of these works that engendered opposition toward civil society. It then traces the correspondence between the communal interdependency and moral development of characters in these novels to demonstrate the importance of intermediate associations for a free and good society.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph.D.
Level thesis:degree_level
Doctoral
Grantor
Baylor University.
Year dc:date.issued
2015

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Schaefer, Eric C.
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Fulton, Joe B., 1962-

Subjects

dc:subject × 4

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.
Language dc:language.iso
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/2104/9322
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/9322

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Baylor University
Base URL
baylor-ir.tdl.org/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Schaefer, Eric C.. Fitzgerald, Lewis, Wharton, Anderson, and individual-community conflict in the 1920 American novel.. Doctoral thesis, Baylor University., 2015. https://hdl.handle.net/2104/9322