{"id":{"repo_id":"baylor","oai_identifier":"oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/8583"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/baylor/oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/8583","repository":{"repo_id":"baylor","name":"Baylor University","base_url":"https://baylor-ir.tdl.org/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Knowledge updating in jurors : cognitive load affects juror decision making.","abstract":"Mock jurors read a trial summary describing the armed robbery of a convenience store and rendered a verdict. Then, half of the jurors viewed an exculpatory videotape of the robbery; the remaining jurors completed an unrelated task. All jurors voted again. Those who watched the video were less likely to vote guilty at Time 2. In Experiment 2, we manipulated cognitive load by having the jurors memorize a series of numbers during summary reading and videotape viewing. Jurors in the cognitive load condition were less likely to vote guilty after reading the summary and were less likely to modify their verdict after viewing the exculpatory video. In Experiment 3, we manipulated cognitive load by adding extraneous details to the case summary and limiting the time available to read the summary. The results confirmed those of Experiment 2. These results are consistent with a resource-limited knowledge updating view of juror decision-making.","abstract_html":"Mock jurors read a trial summary describing the armed robbery of a convenience store and rendered a verdict. Then, half of the jurors viewed an exculpatory videotape of the robbery; the remaining jurors completed an unrelated task. All jurors voted again. Those who watched the video were less likely to vote guilty at Time 2. In Experiment 2, we manipulated cognitive load by having the jurors memorize a series of numbers during summary reading and videotape viewing. Jurors in the cognitive load condition were less likely to vote guilty after reading the summary and were less likely to modify their verdict after viewing the exculpatory video. In Experiment 3, we manipulated cognitive load by adding extraneous details to the case summary and limiting the time available to read the summary. The results confirmed those of Experiment 2. These results are consistent with a resource-limited knowledge updating view of juror decision-making.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Malavanti, Karenna Faisury."],"institution":"Baylor University.","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Weaver, Chuck A. (Charles A.), III."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-12","date_published":"2012-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:08:02Z","subjects":["Juror decision making.","Cognitive load.","Eyewitness testimony."],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2104/8583","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Weaver, Chuck A. (Charles A.), III."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Malavanti, Karenna Faisury."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2013-05-15T18:40:47Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2013-05-15T18:40:47Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2012-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Baylor University."]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Juror decision making.","Cognitive load.","Eyewitness testimony."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2104/8583"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Mock jurors read a trial summary describing the armed robbery of a convenience store and rendered a verdict. Then, half of the jurors viewed an exculpatory videotape of the robbery; the remaining jurors completed an unrelated task. All jurors voted again. Those who watched the video were less likely to vote guilty at Time 2. In Experiment 2, we manipulated cognitive load by having the jurors memorize a series of numbers during summary reading and videotape viewing. Jurors in the cognitive load condition were less likely to vote guilty after reading the summary and were less likely to modify their verdict after viewing the exculpatory video. In Experiment 3, we manipulated cognitive load by adding extraneous details to the case summary and limiting the time available to read the summary. The results confirmed those of Experiment 2. These results are consistent with a resource-limited knowledge updating view of juror decision-making."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Knowledge updating in jurors : cognitive load affects juror decision making."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Weaver, Chuck A. (Charles A.), III."],"dc:creator":["Malavanti, Karenna Faisury."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2013-05-15T18:40:47Z"],"dc:date.available":["2013-05-15T18:40:47Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2012-12"],"dc:description.abstract":["Mock jurors read a trial summary describing the armed robbery of a convenience store and rendered a verdict. Then, half of the jurors viewed an exculpatory videotape of the robbery; the remaining jurors completed an unrelated task. All jurors voted again. Those who watched the video were less likely to vote guilty at Time 2. In Experiment 2, we manipulated cognitive load by having the jurors memorize a series of numbers during summary reading and videotape viewing. Jurors in the cognitive load condition were less likely to vote guilty after reading the summary and were less likely to modify their verdict after viewing the exculpatory video. In Experiment 3, we manipulated cognitive load by adding extraneous details to the case summary and limiting the time available to read the summary. The results confirmed those of Experiment 2. These results are consistent with a resource-limited knowledge updating view of juror decision-making."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/2104/8583"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:rights":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."],"dc:subject":["Juror decision making.","Cognitive load.","Eyewitness testimony."],"dc:title":["Knowledge updating in jurors : cognitive load affects juror decision making."],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["Baylor University."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:08:02Z"}