{"id":{"repo_id":"baylor","oai_identifier":"oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/8015"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/baylor/oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/8015","repository":{"repo_id":"baylor","name":"Baylor University","base_url":"https://baylor-ir.tdl.org/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The trade balancing act : reconciling domestic and foreign politics.","abstract":"This paper examines the motives for policymakers in their use of antidumping tariffs. In a scenario where a country is facing domestic political economy influences and foreign political economy influences, I find evidence that countries are not in a repeated &quot;prisoner&apos;s dilemma&quot; game, but they are in a game of &quot;chicken.&quot; In the repeated tariff-setting game, countries take turns in setting antidumping tariffs to appease domestic producers and minimize injury to relationships with important trading partners. I also find that, when examining the US antidumping tariff decisions specifically, the International Trade Association sets tariffs significantly lower against the most important trading partners, a result shown through OLS and instrumental variables regressions.","abstract_html":"This paper examines the motives for policymakers in their use of antidumping tariffs. In a scenario where a country is facing domestic political economy influences and foreign political economy influences, I find evidence that countries are not in a repeated &amp;quot;prisoner&amp;apos;s dilemma&amp;quot; game, but they are in a game of &amp;quot;chicken.&amp;quot; In the repeated tariff-setting game, countries take turns in setting antidumping tariffs to appease domestic producers and minimize injury to relationships with important trading partners. I also find that, when examining the US antidumping tariff decisions specifically, the International Trade Association sets tariffs significantly lower against the most important trading partners, a result shown through OLS and instrumental variables regressions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Abbott, Patricia A. (Patricia Anne), 1987-"],"institution":"Baylor University.","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Pham, Van Hoang."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-10","date_published":"2010-10","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:08:16Z","subjects":["World Trade Organization.","Antidumping.","Political economy.","Trade.","Tariffs.","Cooperation."],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2104/8015","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Pham, Van Hoang."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Abbott, Patricia A. (Patricia Anne), 1987-"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2010-10-08T16:11:27Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2010-10-08T16:11:27Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2010-10"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Baylor University."]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["World Trade Organization.","Antidumping.","Political economy.","Trade.","Tariffs.","Cooperation."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2104/8015"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This paper examines the motives for policymakers in their use of antidumping tariffs. In a scenario where a country is facing domestic political economy influences and foreign political economy influences, I find evidence that countries are not in a repeated &quot;prisoner&apos;s dilemma&quot; game, but they are in a game of &quot;chicken.&quot; In the repeated tariff-setting game, countries take turns in setting antidumping tariffs to appease domestic producers and minimize injury to relationships with important trading partners. I also find that, when examining the US antidumping tariff decisions specifically, the International Trade Association sets tariffs significantly lower against the most important trading partners, a result shown through OLS and instrumental variables regressions."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The trade balancing act : reconciling domestic and foreign politics."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Pham, Van Hoang."],"dc:creator":["Abbott, Patricia A. (Patricia Anne), 1987-"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2010-10-08T16:11:27Z"],"dc:date.available":["2010-10-08T16:11:27Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2010-10"],"dc:description.abstract":["This paper examines the motives for policymakers in their use of antidumping tariffs. In a scenario where a country is facing domestic political economy influences and foreign political economy influences, I find evidence that countries are not in a repeated &quot;prisoner&apos;s dilemma&quot; game, but they are in a game of &quot;chicken.&quot; In the repeated tariff-setting game, countries take turns in setting antidumping tariffs to appease domestic producers and minimize injury to relationships with important trading partners. I also find that, when examining the US antidumping tariff decisions specifically, the International Trade Association sets tariffs significantly lower against the most important trading partners, a result shown through OLS and instrumental variables regressions."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/2104/8015"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:rights":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."],"dc:subject":["World Trade Organization.","Antidumping.","Political economy.","Trade.","Tariffs.","Cooperation."],"dc:title":["The trade balancing act : reconciling domestic and foreign politics."],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["Baylor University."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:08:16Z"}