{"id":{"repo_id":"baylor","oai_identifier":"oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/13495"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/baylor/oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/13495","repository":{"repo_id":"baylor","name":"Baylor University","base_url":"https://baylor-ir.tdl.org/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Fiducial accountability for collections : a comparison of traditional and non-traditional museums.","abstract":"The fiducial accountability of traditional and non-traditional museums regarding non-living biological collections is clarified through a historical review of natural history museums, botanical gardens, and zoological gardens, and an examination of their mandating documents, such as articles of incorporation, enabling legislation, bylaws, mission statements, and professional codes of ethics. The mandating documents lack both consistency and substantial support for collections. This lack of legal accountability for collections has the potential to seriously undermine collection integrity, institutional and professional identity, and the public trust. Recommendations are made to further address the issue of fiducial responsibility, including further study, institutional oversight, and professional oversight.","abstract_html":"The fiducial accountability of traditional and non-traditional museums regarding non-living biological collections is clarified through a historical review of natural history museums, botanical gardens, and zoological gardens, and an examination of their mandating documents, such as articles of incorporation, enabling legislation, bylaws, mission statements, and professional codes of ethics. The mandating documents lack both consistency and substantial support for collections. This lack of legal accountability for collections has the potential to seriously undermine collection integrity, institutional and professional identity, and the public trust. Recommendations are made to further address the issue of fiducial responsibility, including further study, institutional oversight, and professional oversight.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Holt, Jennifer L."],"institution":"Baylor University.","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Williams, Stephen L., 1948-"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2004,"date_issued":"2004-12","date_published":"2004-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:08:23Z","subjects":["Museums -- Collection management.","Museums -- Management -- Moral and ethical aspects.","Natural history museums -- Collection management.","Botanical gardens.","Zoos."],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2104/13495","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Williams, Stephen L., 1948-"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Holt, Jennifer L."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2025-06-30T18:20:33Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2025-06-30T18:20:33Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2004-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Baylor University."]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Museums -- Collection management.","Museums -- Management -- Moral and ethical aspects.","Natural history museums -- Collection management.","Botanical gardens.","Zoos."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2104/13495"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The fiducial accountability of traditional and non-traditional museums regarding non-living biological collections is clarified through a historical review of natural history museums, botanical gardens, and zoological gardens, and an examination of their mandating documents, such as articles of incorporation, enabling legislation, bylaws, mission statements, and professional codes of ethics. The mandating documents lack both consistency and substantial support for collections. This lack of legal accountability for collections has the potential to seriously undermine collection integrity, institutional and professional identity, and the public trust. Recommendations are made to further address the issue of fiducial responsibility, including further study, institutional oversight, and professional oversight."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Fiducial accountability for collections : a comparison of traditional and non-traditional museums."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Williams, Stephen L., 1948-"],"dc:creator":["Holt, Jennifer L."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2025-06-30T18:20:33Z"],"dc:date.available":["2025-06-30T18:20:33Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2004-12"],"dc:description.abstract":["The fiducial accountability of traditional and non-traditional museums regarding non-living biological collections is clarified through a historical review of natural history museums, botanical gardens, and zoological gardens, and an examination of their mandating documents, such as articles of incorporation, enabling legislation, bylaws, mission statements, and professional codes of ethics. The mandating documents lack both consistency and substantial support for collections. This lack of legal accountability for collections has the potential to seriously undermine collection integrity, institutional and professional identity, and the public trust. Recommendations are made to further address the issue of fiducial responsibility, including further study, institutional oversight, and professional oversight."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/2104/13495"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:rights":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."],"dc:subject":["Museums -- Collection management.","Museums -- Management -- Moral and ethical aspects.","Natural history museums -- Collection management.","Botanical gardens.","Zoos."],"dc:title":["Fiducial accountability for collections : a comparison of traditional and non-traditional museums."],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["Baylor University."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:08:23Z"}