{"id":{"repo_id":"baylor","oai_identifier":"oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/11646"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/baylor/oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/11646","repository":{"repo_id":"baylor","name":"Baylor University","base_url":"https://baylor-ir.tdl.org/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Voting the Bible, the Texan way : a comparative analysis of how megachurch pastors framed the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential election.","abstract":"Rooted deep in the southern United States, Texas has played a role in moving the needle in various election outcomes, particularly concerning conservative issues. Stereotyped by many as a conservative and biblically focused state, Texas has become a forerunner in many matters regarding politically conservative candidates. Looking specifically at the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, Texas led the 'Bible Belt' in conversations concerning politics and candidates, including the safety and sanctity of pulpits. Using framing and First Amendment theories, this analysis takes a critical look at how Texas megachurch pastors used framing techniques and their personal opinions to frame campaign topics in their election-day sermons. An analysis of sermons suggests the following tactics were common: using scripture references as metaphors, linking Old Testament traditions to modern practices, and linking God's favor to political leadership. The number of pastors with large congregations who discussed politics offers a glimpse at the role Texas megachurches play in the framing of U.S. Presidential candidates for congregants. Future studies might assess the impact of this type of rhetoric on society. Other studies might assess its impact on how people vote.","abstract_html":"Rooted deep in the southern United States, Texas has played a role in moving the needle in various election outcomes, particularly concerning conservative issues. Stereotyped by many as a conservative and biblically focused state, Texas has become a forerunner in many matters regarding politically conservative candidates. Looking specifically at the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, Texas led the 'Bible Belt' in conversations concerning politics and candidates, including the safety and sanctity of pulpits. Using framing and First Amendment theories, this analysis takes a critical look at how Texas megachurch pastors used framing techniques and their personal opinions to frame campaign topics in their election-day sermons. An analysis of sermons suggests the following tactics were common: using scripture references as metaphors, linking Old Testament traditions to modern practices, and linking God's favor to political leadership. The number of pastors with large congregations who discussed politics offers a glimpse at the role Texas megachurches play in the framing of U.S. Presidential candidates for congregants. Future studies might assess the impact of this type of rhetoric on society. Other studies might assess its impact on how people vote.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Guajardo, Emily Alexandra, 1996-"],"institution":"Baylor University.","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Moody-Ramirez, Mia."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-08","date_published":"2021-08","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:08:02Z","subjects":["Politics.","United States.","Texas.","Religion.","Media.","Sermons.","Framing theory.","Mass communications.","First Amendment."],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2104/11646","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Moody-Ramirez, Mia."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Guajardo, Emily Alexandra, 1996-"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2021-10-08T13:50:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2021-10-08T13:50:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2021-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Baylor University."]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Politics.","United States.","Texas.","Religion.","Media.","Sermons.","Framing theory.","Mass communications.","First Amendment."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2104/11646"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Rooted deep in the southern United States, Texas has played a role in moving the needle in various election outcomes, particularly concerning conservative issues. Stereotyped by many as a conservative and biblically focused state, Texas has become a forerunner in many matters regarding politically conservative candidates. Looking specifically at the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, Texas led the 'Bible Belt' in conversations concerning politics and candidates, including the safety and sanctity of pulpits. Using framing and First Amendment theories, this analysis takes a critical look at how Texas megachurch pastors used framing techniques and their personal opinions to frame campaign topics in their election-day sermons. An analysis of sermons suggests the following tactics were common: using scripture references as metaphors, linking Old Testament traditions to modern practices, and linking God's favor to political leadership. The number of pastors with large congregations who discussed politics offers a glimpse at the role Texas megachurches play in the framing of U.S. Presidential candidates for congregants. Future studies might assess the impact of this type of rhetoric on society. Other studies might assess its impact on how people vote."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Voting the Bible, the Texan way : a comparative analysis of how megachurch pastors framed the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential election."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Moody-Ramirez, Mia."],"dc:creator":["Guajardo, Emily Alexandra, 1996-"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2021-10-08T13:50:29Z"],"dc:date.available":["2021-10-08T13:50:29Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2021-08"],"dc:description.abstract":["Rooted deep in the southern United States, Texas has played a role in moving the needle in various election outcomes, particularly concerning conservative issues. Stereotyped by many as a conservative and biblically focused state, Texas has become a forerunner in many matters regarding politically conservative candidates. Looking specifically at the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, Texas led the 'Bible Belt' in conversations concerning politics and candidates, including the safety and sanctity of pulpits. Using framing and First Amendment theories, this analysis takes a critical look at how Texas megachurch pastors used framing techniques and their personal opinions to frame campaign topics in their election-day sermons. An analysis of sermons suggests the following tactics were common: using scripture references as metaphors, linking Old Testament traditions to modern practices, and linking God's favor to political leadership. The number of pastors with large congregations who discussed politics offers a glimpse at the role Texas megachurches play in the framing of U.S. Presidential candidates for congregants. Future studies might assess the impact of this type of rhetoric on society. Other studies might assess its impact on how people vote."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/2104/11646"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:rights":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."],"dc:subject":["Politics.","United States.","Texas.","Religion.","Media.","Sermons.","Framing theory.","Mass communications.","First Amendment."],"dc:title":["Voting the Bible, the Texan way : a comparative analysis of how megachurch pastors framed the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential election."],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["Baylor University."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:08:02Z"}