{"id":{"repo_id":"baylor","oai_identifier":"oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/10443"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/baylor/oai:baylor-ir.tdl.org:2104/10443","repository":{"repo_id":"baylor","name":"Baylor University","base_url":"https://baylor-ir.tdl.org/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"&quot;What was repeated had weight&quot; : ordinary rituals in the poetry of Donald Hall, Derek Walcott, Seamus Heaney, and Louise Glück.","abstract":"Twentieth- and twenty-first century poetry swells with the ordinary; poets chronicle mundane parts of daily life in their work, often describing these quotidian details with surprising reverence. While this fascination with the ordinary has been well documented in literary criticism, the significant role of ordinary rituals—ordinary actions that are repeated over and over in daily life—deserves much further consideration. My dissertation explores the subtly healing powers of ordinary rituals in the poetry of Donald Hall, Derek Walcott, Seamus Heaney, and Louise Glück. Their poetic speakers perform ordinary rituals as a response to the difficult, wounding situations they face, including losses of family members (Hall), racial tensions that span generations (Walcott), political violence that results in death (Heaney), and existential depression (Glück). As the days go by, these ordinary rituals alter their speakers&apos; visions slightly, enabling them to see and approach their situations differently. As they are repeated over time, these ordinary rituals offer their enactors a means of continuing on, however subtle or recursive such a process remains. Ordinary rituals finally gesture at healing as they allow their enactors to contemplate their losses and wounds in steadfast, living ways. This interpretation is significant not only because it promotes ordinary ritual as a means for people to begin healing from their various wounds across many cultures and contexts, but also because it reveals the potential healing powers of poetry itself—a ritualistic art form created out of everyday language. As poetry utilizes repeating elements in order to offer profound insights into the human condition, so do ordinary rituals utilize repeating actions to offer their enactors healing over time.","abstract_html":"Twentieth- and twenty-first century poetry swells with the ordinary; poets chronicle mundane parts of daily life in their work, often describing these quotidian details with surprising reverence. While this fascination with the ordinary has been well documented in literary criticism, the significant role of ordinary rituals—ordinary actions that are repeated over and over in daily life—deserves much further consideration. My dissertation explores the subtly healing powers of ordinary rituals in the poetry of Donald Hall, Derek Walcott, Seamus Heaney, and Louise Glück. Their poetic speakers perform ordinary rituals as a response to the difficult, wounding situations they face, including losses of family members (Hall), racial tensions that span generations (Walcott), political violence that results in death (Heaney), and existential depression (Glück). As the days go by, these ordinary rituals alter their speakers&amp;apos; visions slightly, enabling them to see and approach their situations differently. As they are repeated over time, these ordinary rituals offer their enactors a means of continuing on, however subtle or recursive such a process remains. Ordinary rituals finally gesture at healing as they allow their enactors to contemplate their losses and wounds in steadfast, living ways. This interpretation is significant not only because it promotes ordinary ritual as a means for people to begin healing from their various wounds across many cultures and contexts, but also because it reveals the potential healing powers of poetry itself—a ritualistic art form created out of everyday language. As poetry utilizes repeating elements in order to offer profound insights into the human condition, so do ordinary rituals utilize repeating actions to offer their enactors healing over time.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Carpenter, Amy E., 1986-"],"institution":"Baylor University.","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Russell, Richard Rankin."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-08","date_published":"2018-08","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:08:10Z","subjects":["Ordinary ritual.","Repetition.","Donald Hall.","Derek Walcott.","Seamus Heaney.","Louise Glück."],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2104/10443","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Russell, Richard Rankin."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Carpenter, Amy E., 1986-"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2018-09-07T13:41:35Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-09-07T13:41:35Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2018-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Baylor University."]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Ordinary ritual.","Repetition.","Donald Hall.","Derek Walcott.","Seamus Heaney.","Louise Glück."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2104/10443"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Twentieth- and twenty-first century poetry swells with the ordinary; poets chronicle mundane parts of daily life in their work, often describing these quotidian details with surprising reverence. While this fascination with the ordinary has been well documented in literary criticism, the significant role of ordinary rituals—ordinary actions that are repeated over and over in daily life—deserves much further consideration. My dissertation explores the subtly healing powers of ordinary rituals in the poetry of Donald Hall, Derek Walcott, Seamus Heaney, and Louise Glück. Their poetic speakers perform ordinary rituals as a response to the difficult, wounding situations they face, including losses of family members (Hall), racial tensions that span generations (Walcott), political violence that results in death (Heaney), and existential depression (Glück). As the days go by, these ordinary rituals alter their speakers&apos; visions slightly, enabling them to see and approach their situations differently. As they are repeated over time, these ordinary rituals offer their enactors a means of continuing on, however subtle or recursive such a process remains. Ordinary rituals finally gesture at healing as they allow their enactors to contemplate their losses and wounds in steadfast, living ways. This interpretation is significant not only because it promotes ordinary ritual as a means for people to begin healing from their various wounds across many cultures and contexts, but also because it reveals the potential healing powers of poetry itself—a ritualistic art form created out of everyday language. As poetry utilizes repeating elements in order to offer profound insights into the human condition, so do ordinary rituals utilize repeating actions to offer their enactors healing over time."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["&quot;What was repeated had weight&quot; : ordinary rituals in the poetry of Donald Hall, Derek Walcott, Seamus Heaney, and Louise Glück."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Russell, Richard Rankin."],"dc:creator":["Carpenter, Amy E., 1986-"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2018-09-07T13:41:35Z"],"dc:date.available":["2018-09-07T13:41:35Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2018-08"],"dc:description.abstract":["Twentieth- and twenty-first century poetry swells with the ordinary; poets chronicle mundane parts of daily life in their work, often describing these quotidian details with surprising reverence. While this fascination with the ordinary has been well documented in literary criticism, the significant role of ordinary rituals—ordinary actions that are repeated over and over in daily life—deserves much further consideration. My dissertation explores the subtly healing powers of ordinary rituals in the poetry of Donald Hall, Derek Walcott, Seamus Heaney, and Louise Glück. Their poetic speakers perform ordinary rituals as a response to the difficult, wounding situations they face, including losses of family members (Hall), racial tensions that span generations (Walcott), political violence that results in death (Heaney), and existential depression (Glück). As the days go by, these ordinary rituals alter their speakers&apos; visions slightly, enabling them to see and approach their situations differently. As they are repeated over time, these ordinary rituals offer their enactors a means of continuing on, however subtle or recursive such a process remains. Ordinary rituals finally gesture at healing as they allow their enactors to contemplate their losses and wounds in steadfast, living ways. This interpretation is significant not only because it promotes ordinary ritual as a means for people to begin healing from their various wounds across many cultures and contexts, but also because it reveals the potential healing powers of poetry itself—a ritualistic art form created out of everyday language. As poetry utilizes repeating elements in order to offer profound insights into the human condition, so do ordinary rituals utilize repeating actions to offer their enactors healing over time."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/2104/10443"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:rights":["Baylor University works are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission."],"dc:subject":["Ordinary ritual.","Repetition.","Donald Hall.","Derek Walcott.","Seamus Heaney.","Louise Glück."],"dc:title":["&quot;What was repeated had weight&quot; : ordinary rituals in the poetry of Donald Hall, Derek Walcott, Seamus Heaney, and Louise Glück."],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["Baylor University."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:08:10Z"}