Back to results

University of the Arts London

Performance, Photography, Performativity: What performance 'does' in the still image

Abstract

dc:description

Auslander (2006) states that images generated from performance documentation and practices stemming from performance to camera could be considered ‘performative’ if they are meant to be seen as happening in the ‘now’ they are viewed, with the spectator as the current intended audience. This thesis takes Auslander’s supposition and situates the term performativity within an established academic discourse as a social, political or cultural ‘doing’ and questions what, apart from performing, performance ‘does’ in its transcription to a photographic image. I propose a ‘doing’ occurs because the intentional performance of a given act invokes the power of citation, in turn setting in motion broader cultural references. The contribution to knowledge this thesis makes is the proposition that aspects of the agency of performativity cannot be fully present in the moment of performance, but can be subsequently revealed by the photographic image as it affords the différance [distance/deferral] the spectator requires to consider the action within a wider structural unconsciousness. Originating from a conceptualist tradition of using ‘art as experiment’, the hypothesis is tested heuristically using a practice-based method of performance to camera. This is presented in the manner of autoethnographic fieldwork, which explores the time-based tensions between performance and photography in three different ways. Firstly, through instantaneous performance actions and the subsequent withdrawal of motion in the still image; secondly, the staging of one-off performance interventions and how they are perceived outside of the time and place in which they occurred via the photograph; and lastly, how repetition is used as a visual device to allow the spectator to ‘revisit’ their framework of understanding. By connecting critical reflection of these photographic investigations to theoretical perspectives, each chapter concludes how viewing the performance outside of the live act in the form of a photograph uncovers the ‘doing’ of its performativity. The final conclusion reviews why performativity surpasses the presence/absence binary previously perceived in photographic documentation, and how we might revise our usage of the term ‘performative’ in the area of performance to camera and studies of performance documentation in the light of these discoveries.

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Taylor, Allan S

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • cc_by_nc_nd
Language dc:language
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
Taylor, Allan S <https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/view/creators/Taylor=3AAllan_S=3A=3A.html> (2017) Performance, Photography, Performativity: What performance 'does' in the still image. PhD thesis, University of the Arts London and Falmouth University.
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk:13431

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of the Arts London
Base URL
ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/cgi/oai2
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Taylor, Allan S. Performance, Photography, Performativity: What performance 'does' in the still image. 2017.