{"id":{"repo_id":"arkansas","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarworks.uark.edu:etd-4173"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/arkansas/oai:scholarworks.uark.edu:etd-4173","repository":{"repo_id":"arkansas","name":"University of Arkansas","base_url":"https://scholarworks.uark.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"An Examination of the Application of the Chevron Doctrine in U.S. District Courts","abstract":"<p>This paper is an examination of the case Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984). Using cases from the U.S. Ninth District Circuit Courts, from the years 2008 and 2009,1 examine how this case is being used today. Both behavioral models and models made explicitly to study the use of Chevron were used in order to determine not only how a judge cites this case but also whether their political orientation plays a role.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;This paper is an examination of the case Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984). Using cases from the U.S. Ninth District Circuit Courts, from the years 2008 and 2009,1 examine how this case is being used today. Both behavioral models and models made explicitly to study the use of Chevron were used in order to determine not only how a judge cites this case but also whether their political orientation plays a role.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Prince, Rebekah Ruth"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Arts in Political Science (MA)","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dowdle, Andrew J.","Jimeno, Rafael"],"advisors":["Schreckhise, William D."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2011-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:00:09Z","subjects":["Administrative Law","Natural Resources Law"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2624","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dowdle, Andrew J.","Jimeno, Rafael"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Schreckhise, William D."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Prince, Rebekah Ruth"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-03-08T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts in Political Science (MA)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Administrative Law","Natural Resources Law"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2624"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>This paper is an examination of the case Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984). Using cases from the U.S. Ninth District Circuit Courts, from the years 2008 and 2009,1 examine how this case is being used today. Both behavioral models and models made explicitly to study the use of Chevron were used in order to determine not only how a judge cites this case but also whether their political orientation plays a role.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["An Examination of the Application of the Chevron Doctrine in U.S. District Courts"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dowdle, Andrew J.","Jimeno, Rafael"],"dc:contributor.advisor":["Schreckhise, William D."],"dc:creator":["Prince, Rebekah Ruth"],"dc:date":["2011"],"dc:date.available":["2018-03-08T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>This paper is an examination of the case Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984). Using cases from the U.S. Ninth District Circuit Courts, from the years 2008 and 2009,1 examine how this case is being used today. Both behavioral models and models made explicitly to study the use of Chevron were used in order to determine not only how a judge cites this case but also whether their political orientation plays a role.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2624"],"dc:subject":["Administrative Law","Natural Resources Law"],"dc:title":["An Examination of the Application of the Chevron Doctrine in U.S. District Courts"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts in Political Science (MA)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:00:09Z"}