Crossbred heifers (n = 286, 255 ± 4.5 kg initial BW, 295 ± 16.5 d of age) were used over a 2-yr period to determine the effects of mineral source on beef heifer development at 2 locations (n = 71 and n = 72, Fayetteville, blocks 1 and 4; n = 72 in each of 2 breeding groups, Batesville, blocks 2 and 3). Heifers were stratified based on initial BW, age, health, prior research projects, and sire, and then assigned to 6 groups of 12 heifers, that were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 trace mineral treatments. The 2 treatments were trace mineral supplementation (Cu [74 mg/d], Mn [294 mg/d], and Zn [221 mg/d]) as 1) sulfate or 2) hydroxychloride sources. Treatments were delivered through mineral and vitamin supplements provided free choice and formulated for a consumption rate of 113 g/d. Treatments began on d 0, and the breeding season began on d 112 and d 105 (blocks 1 and 4 respectively). After a synchronization period and a 10 d eligible period for artificial insemination, heifers were exposed to bulls for 50 d. At d 130 (block 2) and d 146 (block 3) heifers were exposed to bulls for 60 d. The trail concluded on d 224 (block 1), d 227 (block 4), d 252 (block 2), and d 268 (block 3). During the trial, BW at 28-d intervals, mineral disappearance, health records, and reproductive efficiency data were recorded. At the end of each trial, pregnancy was confirmed by the presence of Pregnancy-Specific Protein B concentrations in blood. No treatment differences (P ≥ 0.52) were detected in BW or ADG. There was no significance for greater mineral disappearance between mineral sulfate and hydroxychloride treatments (P = 0.46) There were no differences in the percentage of heifers treated for bovine respiratory disease (P = 0.77) or foot rot occurrence (P = 0.57) between sulfate and hydroxychloride treatments. Trace mineral source did not affect overall pregnancy rates (P = 0.85). Therefore, supplementing either a sulfate or hydroxychloride source of Zn, Cu, and Mn to developing beef heifers resulted in similar performance.
","abstract_html":"<p>Crossbred heifers (n = 286, 255 ± 4.5 kg initial BW, 295 ± 16.5 d of age) were used over a 2-yr period to determine the effects of mineral source on beef heifer development at 2 locations (n = 71 and n = 72, Fayetteville, blocks 1 and 4; n = 72 in each of 2 breeding groups, Batesville, blocks 2 and 3). Heifers were stratified based on initial BW, age, health, prior research projects, and sire, and then assigned to 6 groups of 12 heifers, that were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 trace mineral treatments. The 2 treatments were trace mineral supplementation (Cu [74 mg/d], Mn [294 mg/d], and Zn [221 mg/d]) as 1) sulfate or 2) hydroxychloride sources. Treatments were delivered through mineral and vitamin supplements provided free choice and formulated for a consumption rate of 113 g/d. Treatments began on d 0, and the breeding season began on d 112 and d 105 (blocks 1 and 4 respectively). After a synchronization period and a 10 d eligible period for artificial insemination, heifers were exposed to bulls for 50 d. At d 130 (block 2) and d 146 (block 3) heifers were exposed to bulls for 60 d. The trail concluded on d 224 (block 1), d 227 (block 4), d 252 (block 2), and d 268 (block 3). During the trial, BW at 28-d intervals, mineral disappearance, health records, and reproductive efficiency data were recorded. At the end of each trial, pregnancy was confirmed by the presence of Pregnancy-Specific Protein B concentrations in blood. No treatment differences (P ≥ 0.52) were detected in BW or ADG. There was no significance for greater mineral disappearance between mineral sulfate and hydroxychloride treatments (P = 0.46) There were no differences in the percentage of heifers treated for bovine respiratory disease (P = 0.77) or foot rot occurrence (P = 0.57) between sulfate and hydroxychloride treatments. Trace mineral source did not affect overall pregnancy rates (P = 0.85). Therefore, supplementing either a sulfate or hydroxychloride source of Zn, Cu, and Mn to developing beef heifers resulted in similar performance. </p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Burnett, Randy Hunter"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science in Animal Science (MS)","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Kegley, Elizabeth B.","Rorie, Rick W."],"advisors":["Powell, Jeremy G."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-08-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2017-08-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:59:40Z","subjects":["Beef Heifer","Development","Hydroxy Trace Minerals","Sulfate Trace Minerals","Trace Mineral Sources","Animal Studies","Meat Science"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2483","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Kegley, Elizabeth B.","Rorie, Rick W."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Powell, Jeremy G."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Burnett, Randy Hunter"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2024-02-06T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science in Animal Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Beef Heifer","Development","Hydroxy Trace Minerals","Sulfate Trace Minerals","Trace Mineral Sources","Animal Studies","Meat Science"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2483"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Crossbred heifers (n = 286, 255 ± 4.5 kg initial BW, 295 ± 16.5 d of age) were used over a 2-yr period to determine the effects of mineral source on beef heifer development at 2 locations (n = 71 and n = 72, Fayetteville, blocks 1 and 4; n = 72 in each of 2 breeding groups, Batesville, blocks 2 and 3). Heifers were stratified based on initial BW, age, health, prior research projects, and sire, and then assigned to 6 groups of 12 heifers, that were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 trace mineral treatments. The 2 treatments were trace mineral supplementation (Cu [74 mg/d], Mn [294 mg/d], and Zn [221 mg/d]) as 1) sulfate or 2) hydroxychloride sources. Treatments were delivered through mineral and vitamin supplements provided free choice and formulated for a consumption rate of 113 g/d. Treatments began on d 0, and the breeding season began on d 112 and d 105 (blocks 1 and 4 respectively). After a synchronization period and a 10 d eligible period for artificial insemination, heifers were exposed to bulls for 50 d. At d 130 (block 2) and d 146 (block 3) heifers were exposed to bulls for 60 d. The trail concluded on d 224 (block 1), d 227 (block 4), d 252 (block 2), and d 268 (block 3). During the trial, BW at 28-d intervals, mineral disappearance, health records, and reproductive efficiency data were recorded. At the end of each trial, pregnancy was confirmed by the presence of Pregnancy-Specific Protein B concentrations in blood. No treatment differences (P ≥ 0.52) were detected in BW or ADG. There was no significance for greater mineral disappearance between mineral sulfate and hydroxychloride treatments (P = 0.46) There were no differences in the percentage of heifers treated for bovine respiratory disease (P = 0.77) or foot rot occurrence (P = 0.57) between sulfate and hydroxychloride treatments. Trace mineral source did not affect overall pregnancy rates (P = 0.85). Therefore, supplementing either a sulfate or hydroxychloride source of Zn, Cu, and Mn to developing beef heifers resulted in similar performance.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Supplemental Trace Minerals (Zn, Cu, and Mn) as Sulfates or Hydroxy Trace Mineral Sources for Beef Heifers"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Kegley, Elizabeth B.","Rorie, Rick W."],"dc:contributor.advisor":["Powell, Jeremy G."],"dc:creator":["Burnett, Randy Hunter"],"dc:date":["2017"],"dc:date.available":["2024-02-06T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Crossbred heifers (n = 286, 255 ± 4.5 kg initial BW, 295 ± 16.5 d of age) were used over a 2-yr period to determine the effects of mineral source on beef heifer development at 2 locations (n = 71 and n = 72, Fayetteville, blocks 1 and 4; n = 72 in each of 2 breeding groups, Batesville, blocks 2 and 3). Heifers were stratified based on initial BW, age, health, prior research projects, and sire, and then assigned to 6 groups of 12 heifers, that were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 trace mineral treatments. The 2 treatments were trace mineral supplementation (Cu [74 mg/d], Mn [294 mg/d], and Zn [221 mg/d]) as 1) sulfate or 2) hydroxychloride sources. Treatments were delivered through mineral and vitamin supplements provided free choice and formulated for a consumption rate of 113 g/d. Treatments began on d 0, and the breeding season began on d 112 and d 105 (blocks 1 and 4 respectively). After a synchronization period and a 10 d eligible period for artificial insemination, heifers were exposed to bulls for 50 d. At d 130 (block 2) and d 146 (block 3) heifers were exposed to bulls for 60 d. The trail concluded on d 224 (block 1), d 227 (block 4), d 252 (block 2), and d 268 (block 3). During the trial, BW at 28-d intervals, mineral disappearance, health records, and reproductive efficiency data were recorded. At the end of each trial, pregnancy was confirmed by the presence of Pregnancy-Specific Protein B concentrations in blood. No treatment differences (P ≥ 0.52) were detected in BW or ADG. There was no significance for greater mineral disappearance between mineral sulfate and hydroxychloride treatments (P = 0.46) There were no differences in the percentage of heifers treated for bovine respiratory disease (P = 0.77) or foot rot occurrence (P = 0.57) between sulfate and hydroxychloride treatments. Trace mineral source did not affect overall pregnancy rates (P = 0.85). Therefore, supplementing either a sulfate or hydroxychloride source of Zn, Cu, and Mn to developing beef heifers resulted in similar performance.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2483"],"dc:subject":["Beef Heifer","Development","Hydroxy Trace Minerals","Sulfate Trace Minerals","Trace Mineral Sources","Animal Studies","Meat Science"],"dc:title":["Supplemental Trace Minerals (Zn, Cu, and Mn) as Sulfates or Hydroxy Trace Mineral Sources for Beef Heifers"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science in Animal Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:59:40Z"}