{"id":{"repo_id":"arizona-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/680351"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/arizona-thes/oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/680351","repository":{"repo_id":"arizona-thes","name":"University of Arizona","base_url":"https://repository.arizona.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Indigenous Film as a Storytelling Practice","abstract":"In “Indigenous Film as a Storytelling Practice,” Indigenous cinema is examined as a continuation of Indigenous storytelling practices grounded in relationality, oral transmission, and community accountability. Rather than approaching cinema as an aesthetic object or representational archive, the central question concerns how narrative authority persists and is reconfigured when stories rooted in collective epistemologies enter audiovisual form and circulate across divergent audiences. Through close analysis of Inuit, Kiowa, Yolngu, Aymara, and Kurdish case studies, attention is given to the interdependence of adaptation, collaborative production, and distribution infrastructures in sustaining narrative legitimacy. Formal strategies—durational pacing, repetition, non-linear temporality, untranslated dialogue, and spatial orientation—operate as regulatory mechanisms that position viewers within specific relations to land, language, and memory, while community-centered authorship complicates director-centric models dominant in film theory. As these works move through festivals, educational circuits, community screenings, and digital platforms, the social work of storytelling shifts, foregrounding questions of jurisdiction over meaning and the dispersal of accountability. Comparative proximity does not assume equivalence among distinct political histories; it identifies structural affinities in how films rebuild conditions of address under pressure from displacement, linguistic suppression, and constrained sovereignty. Indigenous cinema thus emerges as a site where oral tradition, collective authorship, and circulation converge, extending narrative reach while insisting that interpretation remains inseparable from relations.","abstract_html":"In “Indigenous Film as a Storytelling Practice,” Indigenous cinema is examined as a continuation of Indigenous storytelling practices grounded in relationality, oral transmission, and community accountability. Rather than approaching cinema as an aesthetic object or representational archive, the central question concerns how narrative authority persists and is reconfigured when stories rooted in collective epistemologies enter audiovisual form and circulate across divergent audiences. Through close analysis of Inuit, Kiowa, Yolngu, Aymara, and Kurdish case studies, attention is given to the interdependence of adaptation, collaborative production, and distribution infrastructures in sustaining narrative legitimacy. Formal strategies—durational pacing, repetition, non-linear temporality, untranslated dialogue, and spatial orientation—operate as regulatory mechanisms that position viewers within specific relations to land, language, and memory, while community-centered authorship complicates director-centric models dominant in film theory. As these works move through festivals, educational circuits, community screenings, and digital platforms, the social work of storytelling shifts, foregrounding questions of jurisdiction over meaning and the dispersal of accountability. Comparative proximity does not assume equivalence among distinct political histories; it identifies structural affinities in how films rebuild conditions of address under pressure from displacement, linguistic suppression, and constrained sovereignty. Indigenous cinema thus emerges as a site where oral tradition, collective authorship, and circulation converge, extending narrative reach while insisting that interpretation remains inseparable from relations.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Erteber, Dilan"],"institution":"The University of Arizona.","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Graduate College","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Fatzinger, Amy S."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Reader, Tristan","Morales, Orquidea"],"year":2026,"date_issued":"2026","date_published":"2026","updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:57:45Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author."],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10150/680351","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Fatzinger, Amy S."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Reader, Tristan","Morales, Orquidea"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Erteber, Dilan"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-05-24T19:18:08Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2026-05-24T19:18:08Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2026"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["The University of Arizona."]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Electronic Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Graduate College","American Indian Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Arizona"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author."]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10150/680351"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["In “Indigenous Film as a Storytelling Practice,” Indigenous cinema is examined as a continuation of Indigenous storytelling practices grounded in relationality, oral transmission, and community accountability. Rather than approaching cinema as an aesthetic object or representational archive, the central question concerns how narrative authority persists and is reconfigured when stories rooted in collective epistemologies enter audiovisual form and circulate across divergent audiences. Through close analysis of Inuit, Kiowa, Yolngu, Aymara, and Kurdish case studies, attention is given to the interdependence of adaptation, collaborative production, and distribution infrastructures in sustaining narrative legitimacy. Formal strategies—durational pacing, repetition, non-linear temporality, untranslated dialogue, and spatial orientation—operate as regulatory mechanisms that position viewers within specific relations to land, language, and memory, while community-centered authorship complicates director-centric models dominant in film theory. As these works move through festivals, educational circuits, community screenings, and digital platforms, the social work of storytelling shifts, foregrounding questions of jurisdiction over meaning and the dispersal of accountability. Comparative proximity does not assume equivalence among distinct political histories; it identifies structural affinities in how films rebuild conditions of address under pressure from displacement, linguistic suppression, and constrained sovereignty. Indigenous cinema thus emerges as a site where oral tradition, collective authorship, and circulation converge, extending narrative reach while insisting that interpretation remains inseparable from relations."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Indigenous Film as a Storytelling Practice"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Fatzinger, Amy S."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Reader, Tristan","Morales, Orquidea"],"dc:creator":["Erteber, Dilan"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-05-24T19:18:08Z"],"dc:date.available":["2026-05-24T19:18:08Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2026"],"dc:description.abstract":["In “Indigenous Film as a Storytelling Practice,” Indigenous cinema is examined as a continuation of Indigenous storytelling practices grounded in relationality, oral transmission, and community accountability. Rather than approaching cinema as an aesthetic object or representational archive, the central question concerns how narrative authority persists and is reconfigured when stories rooted in collective epistemologies enter audiovisual form and circulate across divergent audiences. Through close analysis of Inuit, Kiowa, Yolngu, Aymara, and Kurdish case studies, attention is given to the interdependence of adaptation, collaborative production, and distribution infrastructures in sustaining narrative legitimacy. Formal strategies—durational pacing, repetition, non-linear temporality, untranslated dialogue, and spatial orientation—operate as regulatory mechanisms that position viewers within specific relations to land, language, and memory, while community-centered authorship complicates director-centric models dominant in film theory. As these works move through festivals, educational circuits, community screenings, and digital platforms, the social work of storytelling shifts, foregrounding questions of jurisdiction over meaning and the dispersal of accountability. Comparative proximity does not assume equivalence among distinct political histories; it identifies structural affinities in how films rebuild conditions of address under pressure from displacement, linguistic suppression, and constrained sovereignty. Indigenous cinema thus emerges as a site where oral tradition, collective authorship, and circulation converge, extending narrative reach while insisting that interpretation remains inseparable from relations."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10150/680351"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["The University of Arizona."],"dc:rights":["Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author."],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Indigenous Film as a Storytelling Practice"],"dc:type":["text","Electronic Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Graduate College","American Indian Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Arizona"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:57:45Z"}