Back to results

The University of Arizona.

“Who Breaked the Rule?”: Rethinking English Past Tense Overregularizations

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

To learn a language, children must go beyond simply imitating speech and learn the rules of the language from their surrounding linguistic environment. One way to tell that children learn rules is that they apply rules to an overly broad set of words. For example, English-learning children produce forms like ‘breaked’ or ‘catched’ at around 3 years of age. These forms, called past tense overregularizations, show that children have implicitly discovered the past tense formation rule: namely, “add ‘–ed’ to a verb to create the past tense.” But does it take children until age 3 to discover such rules? This dissertation combines a behavioral study with 16-month-olds and a corpus analysis of longitudinal, spontaneous child speech to achieve two goals: the first is to seek evidence that the past tense rule can be found in 16-month-olds, which would be consistent with many observations that children display significant receptive abilities long before their productive abilities reach the same level. The second goal is to determine if the production of past tense overregularizations can be explained by factors other than the discovery of a grammatical rule. Results indicate that children have enough experience with English by 16 months of age to represent verb + ‘–ed’ months before they begin to overregularize in production; therefore, production does not seem to reflect when the past tense rule actually comes online. 16-month-olds were able to discriminate between overregularized verbs and 1) their correct counterparts, 2) nonce verbs + ‘–ed’, and 3) English noun stems marked with ‘–ed’. Further, overregularizations in production seem to reflect children's need to simplify their utterances as they attempt to say more and more complex sentences.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph.D.
Level thesis:degree_level
doctoral
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Graduate College
Grantor dc:publisher
The University of Arizona.
Year dc:date.issued
2018

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Figueroa, Megan Danielle
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Gerken, LouAnn
Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
  • Harley, Heidi
  • Gómez, Rebecca

Subjects

dc:subject × 4

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
Language dc:language.iso
en_US

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/628007
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/628007

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Arizona
Base URL
repository.arizona.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Figueroa, Megan Danielle. “Who Breaked the Rule?”: Rethinking English Past Tense Overregularizations. doctoral thesis, The University of Arizona., 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/628007