{"id":{"repo_id":"arizona-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/187879"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/arizona-thes/oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/187879","repository":{"repo_id":"arizona-thes","name":"University of Arizona","base_url":"https://repository.arizona.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD).","abstract":"Reducing circuit complexity to minimize design turnaround time and maximize chip area utilization is the most evident problem in dealing with VLSI layout. Three suggestions have been recommended to reduce circuit complexity. They are using regular modules as design targets, using hierarchical top-down design as a design methodology, and using CAD as a design tool. These three suggestions are the basis of this dissertation project. In this dissertation, three silicon compilers were implemented which take an universal AHPL circuit description as an input and automatically translate it into SLA (Storage Logic Array), PPLA (Path Programmable Logic Array), and ULA (Uncommitted Logic Array) chip layout. The goal is to study different layout algorithms and to derive better algorithms for alternative VLSI structures. In order to make a precise chip area comparison of these three silicon compilers, real SLA and ULA circuits have been designed. Four typical AHPL descriptions of different circuits or varying complexity were chosen as comparison examples. The result shows that the SLA layout requires least area for circuit realization generally. The PPLA approach is the worst one for large scale circuit realization, while the ULA lies in between.","abstract_html":"Reducing circuit complexity to minimize design turnaround time and maximize chip area utilization is the most evident problem in dealing with VLSI layout. Three suggestions have been recommended to reduce circuit complexity. They are using regular modules as design targets, using hierarchical top-down design as a design methodology, and using CAD as a design tool. These three suggestions are the basis of this dissertation project. In this dissertation, three silicon compilers were implemented which take an universal AHPL circuit description as an input and automatically translate it into SLA (Storage Logic Array), PPLA (Path Programmable Logic Array), and ULA (Uncommitted Logic Array) chip layout. The goal is to study different layout algorithms and to derive better algorithms for alternative VLSI structures. In order to make a precise chip area comparison of these three silicon compilers, real SLA and ULA circuits have been designed. Four typical AHPL descriptions of different circuits or varying complexity were chosen as comparison examples. The result shows that the SLA layout requires least area for circuit realization generally. The PPLA approach is the worst one for large scale circuit realization, while the ULA lies in between.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["CHEN, DUAN-PING."],"institution":"The University of Arizona.","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Electrical and Computer Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Hill, Frederick J."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1984,"date_issued":"1984","date_published":"1984","updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:56:22Z","subjects":["Integrated circuits -- Very large scale integration.","Compiling (Electronic computers)","Electronic circuit design."],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187879","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Hill, Frederick J."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["CHEN, DUAN-PING."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2011-10-31T18:54:15Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2011-10-31T18:54:15Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1984"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["The University of Arizona."]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Electrical and Computer Engineering","Graduate College"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Arizona"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Integrated circuits -- Very large scale integration.","Compiling (Electronic computers)","Electronic circuit design."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187879"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Reducing circuit complexity to minimize design turnaround time and maximize chip area utilization is the most evident problem in dealing with VLSI layout. Three suggestions have been recommended to reduce circuit complexity. They are using regular modules as design targets, using hierarchical top-down design as a design methodology, and using CAD as a design tool. These three suggestions are the basis of this dissertation project. In this dissertation, three silicon compilers were implemented which take an universal AHPL circuit description as an input and automatically translate it into SLA (Storage Logic Array), PPLA (Path Programmable Logic Array), and ULA (Uncommitted Logic Array) chip layout. The goal is to study different layout algorithms and to derive better algorithms for alternative VLSI structures. In order to make a precise chip area comparison of these three silicon compilers, real SLA and ULA circuits have been designed. Four typical AHPL descriptions of different circuits or varying complexity were chosen as comparison examples. The result shows that the SLA layout requires least area for circuit realization generally. The PPLA approach is the worst one for large scale circuit realization, while the ULA lies in between."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD)."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Hill, Frederick J."],"dc:creator":["CHEN, DUAN-PING."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2011-10-31T18:54:15Z"],"dc:date.available":["2011-10-31T18:54:15Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1984"],"dc:description.abstract":["Reducing circuit complexity to minimize design turnaround time and maximize chip area utilization is the most evident problem in dealing with VLSI layout. Three suggestions have been recommended to reduce circuit complexity. They are using regular modules as design targets, using hierarchical top-down design as a design methodology, and using CAD as a design tool. These three suggestions are the basis of this dissertation project. In this dissertation, three silicon compilers were implemented which take an universal AHPL circuit description as an input and automatically translate it into SLA (Storage Logic Array), PPLA (Path Programmable Logic Array), and ULA (Uncommitted Logic Array) chip layout. The goal is to study different layout algorithms and to derive better algorithms for alternative VLSI structures. In order to make a precise chip area comparison of these three silicon compilers, real SLA and ULA circuits have been designed. Four typical AHPL descriptions of different circuits or varying complexity were chosen as comparison examples. The result shows that the SLA layout requires least area for circuit realization generally. The PPLA approach is the worst one for large scale circuit realization, while the ULA lies in between."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187879"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["The University of Arizona."],"dc:rights":["Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author."],"dc:subject":["Integrated circuits -- Very large scale integration.","Compiling (Electronic computers)","Electronic circuit design."],"dc:title":["VLSI REALIZATION OF AHPL DESCRIPTION AS SLA, PPLA, & ULA AND THEIR COMPARISONS (CAD)."],"dc:type":["text","Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic)"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Electrical and Computer Engineering","Graduate College"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Arizona"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:56:22Z"}