Humanist Reconceptualization Of The Dogmatic Marxist Concept Of Religion By Esad Ćimić

<p>This study analyzes and evaluates the humanist reconceptualization of the dogmatic-Marxist concept of religion by the Yuqoslav philosopher Esad CimiC . The questions we address are:How did Cimic reshape the dogmatic Marxist criticism of religion? and What is the significance of this reshaping for both dogmatic Marxism and Christianity?</p> <p>We beqin with the broad outlines of the concepts of metaphysics and epistemoloqy of both dogmatic and humanist Marxism because they provide the basic presuppositions for the understanding of the phenomenon of religion in Marxism. Then, we address those elements of Cimic's life and philosophy which define him as a man and as a philosopher of religion . These matters are of essential importance for the proper understanding of Cimic's concept of religion.</p> <p>We analyze Cimic's reconceptualization of the doqmatic Marxist concept of religion. Cimic rejects the basic doqmatic Marxist concepts of religion as they existed in socialist societies contending that religious alienation is caused by the multiplicity of sources. In his view, religion is not a simple but complex phenomenon which possesses several dimensions. Cimic arques that religion per se is an expression of human beings' natural desire for self-transcendence. Religion is also a socio-historical fact which is caused by the unjust socio-economical conditions. In addition, religion is to be seen as an anthropo-psychological structure which demonstrates that every person has a unique mental composition by which he expresses his religiosity. Cimic contends that the solution for the religious alienation is to be found in the "socially transforming atheism."</p> <p>Cimic's contribution to the concept of religion is evaluated from three perspectives: that of doqmatic Marxism that of inner consistency of his philosophical system, and that of Christian-theism. We conclude that Cimic is to be viewed as a revisionist who has reinterpreted and rejected most aspects of doqmatic Marxism although he has retained some of its features. He can be considered a post-Marxist in that his philosophy, in some respects, qoes beyond the Marxist understandinq of reliqion. In addition, Cimic has made a siqnificant contribution to a creation of new conditions of religious freedom in Yuqoslavia as well as in other countries. Thus, he is to be viewed as a forerunner of the present chanqes in Eastern Europe.</p>

Name thesis:degree_name

Doctor of Philosophy

Level thesis:degree_level

Dissertation

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Religion, Theological Studies PhD

Year dc:date.available

1991

Author dc:creator

• Antic, Radisa

Contributors dc:contributor

• MIroslav Kis
• Fernando L. Canale
• Jacques B. Doukhan

• Marxism
• Religion
• Cimic
• Christianity
• Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion

Repository record dc:identifier

https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1640

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:digitalcommons.andrews.edu:dissertations-2911