{"id":{"repo_id":"andrews-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.andrews.edu:dissertations-1727"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/andrews-thes/oai:digitalcommons.andrews.edu:dissertations-1727","repository":{"repo_id":"andrews-thes","name":"Andrews University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Effects of Administrator Implemented Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Grouping on Reading Achievement of Selected Sixth-Grade Students","abstract":"<p><em>Problem.</em> <em>A Nation at Risk</em> reported that the average achievement score of high-school students on most standardized tests is lower now than it was a quarter of a century ago, and the majority of the brightest students fail to achieve according to their ability. A salient problem in educating pupils is that of attaining reading comprehension achievement scores comparable to their intellectual potential. This study examines the effects of administrator implemented homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping on the reading achievement of selected sixth-grade students.</p> <p><em>Method</em>. This was a quasi-experimental study using parametric techniques. The tests for hypotheses were analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and multiple linear regression. This study compares the reading comprehension achievement of an experimental group and a control group. It also compares the interaction of gender as a factor in reading achievement due to instructional grouping techniques. There were 113 sixth-grade students in the experimental group and 59 students in the control group.</p> <p><em>Results.</em> Nine hypotheses were tested for three reading group levels: (1) high ability, (2) average ability, and (3) low ability. Reading achievement was not affected to a statistically significant degree at alpha = .05 by either instructional approach--homogeneous or heterogeneous--regardless of reading group ability level. Hypotheses applicable to both high-ability and average-ability students exposed to homogeneous instruction found no significant differences related to gender. However, low-ability female students scored significantly higher than low-ability male students. Hypotheses applicable to both high-ability and low-ability students exposed to heterogeneous instruction found no significant differences related to gender. However, average-ability male students scored significantly better than average-ability female students.</p> <p><em>Conclusions</em>. Academic performance, as measured by sixth-grade reading scores, was not affected to a statistically significant degree by the instructional approach--homogeneous or heterogeneous--regardless of reading group ability level. Although there was a degree of inconsistency in regard to gender, average-ability male students tended to perform better in reading classes when exposed to heterogeneous instruction and low-ability female students tended to perform better in reading classes when exposed to homogeneous instruction.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Problem.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;A Nation at Risk&lt;/em&gt; reported that the average achievement score of high-school students on most standardized tests is lower now than it was a quarter of a century ago, and the majority of the brightest students fail to achieve according to their ability. A salient problem in educating pupils is that of attaining reading comprehension achievement scores comparable to their intellectual potential. This study examines the effects of administrator implemented homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping on the reading achievement of selected sixth-grade students.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Method&lt;/em&gt;. This was a quasi-experimental study using parametric techniques. The tests for hypotheses were analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and multiple linear regression. This study compares the reading comprehension achievement of an experimental group and a control group. It also compares the interaction of gender as a factor in reading achievement due to instructional grouping techniques. There were 113 sixth-grade students in the experimental group and 59 students in the control group.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Results.&lt;/em&gt; Nine hypotheses were tested for three reading group levels: (1) high ability, (2) average ability, and (3) low ability. Reading achievement was not affected to a statistically significant degree at alpha = .05 by either instructional approach--homogeneous or heterogeneous--regardless of reading group ability level. Hypotheses applicable to both high-ability and average-ability students exposed to homogeneous instruction found no significant differences related to gender. However, low-ability female students scored significantly higher than low-ability male students. Hypotheses applicable to both high-ability and low-ability students exposed to heterogeneous instruction found no significant differences related to gender. However, average-ability male students scored significantly better than average-ability female students.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Conclusions&lt;/em&gt;. Academic performance, as measured by sixth-grade reading scores, was not affected to a statistically significant degree by the instructional approach--homogeneous or heterogeneous--regardless of reading group ability level. Although there was a degree of inconsistency in regard to gender, average-ability male students tended to perform better in reading classes when exposed to heterogeneous instruction and low-ability female students tended to perform better in reading classes when exposed to homogeneous instruction.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Thacker, Jerry L"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Education","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Higher Education Administration EdD","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Bernard M. Lall","Samuel T. Harris","Frederick Kosinski"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1987,"date_issued":"1987-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"1987-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:54:03Z","subjects":["Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research","Educational Methods"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/728","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Bernard M. Lall","Samuel T. Harris","Frederick Kosinski"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Thacker, Jerry L"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Higher Education Administration EdD"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Education"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research","Educational Methods"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/728"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p><em>Problem.</em> <em>A Nation at Risk</em> reported that the average achievement score of high-school students on most standardized tests is lower now than it was a quarter of a century ago, and the majority of the brightest students fail to achieve according to their ability. A salient problem in educating pupils is that of attaining reading comprehension achievement scores comparable to their intellectual potential. This study examines the effects of administrator implemented homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping on the reading achievement of selected sixth-grade students.</p> <p><em>Method</em>. This was a quasi-experimental study using parametric techniques. The tests for hypotheses were analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and multiple linear regression. This study compares the reading comprehension achievement of an experimental group and a control group. It also compares the interaction of gender as a factor in reading achievement due to instructional grouping techniques. There were 113 sixth-grade students in the experimental group and 59 students in the control group.</p> <p><em>Results.</em> Nine hypotheses were tested for three reading group levels: (1) high ability, (2) average ability, and (3) low ability. Reading achievement was not affected to a statistically significant degree at alpha = .05 by either instructional approach--homogeneous or heterogeneous--regardless of reading group ability level. Hypotheses applicable to both high-ability and average-ability students exposed to homogeneous instruction found no significant differences related to gender. However, low-ability female students scored significantly higher than low-ability male students. Hypotheses applicable to both high-ability and low-ability students exposed to heterogeneous instruction found no significant differences related to gender. However, average-ability male students scored significantly better than average-ability female students.</p> <p><em>Conclusions</em>. Academic performance, as measured by sixth-grade reading scores, was not affected to a statistically significant degree by the instructional approach--homogeneous or heterogeneous--regardless of reading group ability level. Although there was a degree of inconsistency in regard to gender, average-ability male students tended to perform better in reading classes when exposed to heterogeneous instruction and low-ability female students tended to perform better in reading classes when exposed to homogeneous instruction.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Effects of Administrator Implemented Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Grouping on Reading Achievement of Selected Sixth-Grade Students"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Bernard M. Lall","Samuel T. Harris","Frederick Kosinski"],"dc:creator":["Thacker, Jerry L"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p><em>Problem.</em> <em>A Nation at Risk</em> reported that the average achievement score of high-school students on most standardized tests is lower now than it was a quarter of a century ago, and the majority of the brightest students fail to achieve according to their ability. A salient problem in educating pupils is that of attaining reading comprehension achievement scores comparable to their intellectual potential. This study examines the effects of administrator implemented homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping on the reading achievement of selected sixth-grade students.</p> <p><em>Method</em>. This was a quasi-experimental study using parametric techniques. The tests for hypotheses were analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and multiple linear regression. This study compares the reading comprehension achievement of an experimental group and a control group. It also compares the interaction of gender as a factor in reading achievement due to instructional grouping techniques. There were 113 sixth-grade students in the experimental group and 59 students in the control group.</p> <p><em>Results.</em> Nine hypotheses were tested for three reading group levels: (1) high ability, (2) average ability, and (3) low ability. Reading achievement was not affected to a statistically significant degree at alpha = .05 by either instructional approach--homogeneous or heterogeneous--regardless of reading group ability level. Hypotheses applicable to both high-ability and average-ability students exposed to homogeneous instruction found no significant differences related to gender. However, low-ability female students scored significantly higher than low-ability male students. Hypotheses applicable to both high-ability and low-ability students exposed to heterogeneous instruction found no significant differences related to gender. However, average-ability male students scored significantly better than average-ability female students.</p> <p><em>Conclusions</em>. Academic performance, as measured by sixth-grade reading scores, was not affected to a statistically significant degree by the instructional approach--homogeneous or heterogeneous--regardless of reading group ability level. Although there was a degree of inconsistency in regard to gender, average-ability male students tended to perform better in reading classes when exposed to heterogeneous instruction and low-ability female students tended to perform better in reading classes when exposed to homogeneous instruction.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/728"],"dc:subject":["Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research","Educational Methods"],"dc:title":["Effects of Administrator Implemented Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Grouping on Reading Achievement of Selected Sixth-Grade Students"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Higher Education Administration EdD"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Education"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:54:03Z"}