{"id":{"repo_id":"andrews-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.andrews.edu:dissertations-1454"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/andrews-thes/oai:digitalcommons.andrews.edu:dissertations-1454","repository":{"repo_id":"andrews-thes","name":"Andrews University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Successive, Corresponding Epochal Arrangement of the \"Chronogenealogies\" of Genesis 5 and 11B in the Three Textual Traditions : LXXA, SP, and MT","abstract":"<p><em>Problem</em>. The research problem of this study has been, How might church pastors and college Bible teachers answer questions from members/students regarding the three numerically disparate versions of Gen 5 and 11b?</p> <p><em>Method.</em> The categories of chronological data investigated were: prepaternal, remainder, life span, <em>anno mundi</em>, and postflood birth and death. Analysis preceded synthesis, and the formulation of hypotheses followed the investigation of the data. It was assumed that the necessary arithmetic commonly used within Torah was available to the ordinary reader. In hypothetical reconstructions, investigation was confined to extant variants rather than fictitious numbers.</p> <p><em>Findings</em>. An interlocking formula notwithstanding, the prepaternal data of Gen 5 and 11b were found to be artificial and unilaterally derivative, that is, LXXA contained data which SP rearranged and the highly schematized MT later drew upon both LXXA and SP for its arrangement. Differences in each version's data were found to be directly related to epochal calculations pivoting on the flood. LXXA arranged the data into epochs of 2,262 years, ending with 723/722 B.C.; SP, into epochs of 1,307 years, to coincide with the death of Joseph on Egypt; and MT, into epochs of 1,657 years, climaxing with the destruction of the temple in 586 B.C. Two lost LXX versions (both with epochs of 2,242 years) were hypothesized, the first, having a focal point of 622/621 B.C.; the second, 612 B.C. Hypothetical historical and philosophical rationales were explored. It was hypothesized that Jeremiah argued against implementation of some of the schemes.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Problem&lt;/em&gt;. The research problem of this study has been, How might church pastors and college Bible teachers answer questions from members/students regarding the three numerically disparate versions of Gen 5 and 11b?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Method.&lt;/em&gt; The categories of chronological data investigated were: prepaternal, remainder, life span, &lt;em&gt;anno mundi&lt;/em&gt;, and postflood birth and death. Analysis preceded synthesis, and the formulation of hypotheses followed the investigation of the data. It was assumed that the necessary arithmetic commonly used within Torah was available to the ordinary reader. In hypothetical reconstructions, investigation was confined to extant variants rather than fictitious numbers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Findings&lt;/em&gt;. An interlocking formula notwithstanding, the prepaternal data of Gen 5 and 11b were found to be artificial and unilaterally derivative, that is, LXXA contained data which SP rearranged and the highly schematized MT later drew upon both LXXA and SP for its arrangement. Differences in each version&#x27;s data were found to be directly related to epochal calculations pivoting on the flood. LXXA arranged the data into epochs of 2,262 years, ending with 723/722 B.C.; SP, into epochs of 1,307 years, to coincide with the death of Joseph on Egypt; and MT, into epochs of 1,657 years, climaxing with the destruction of the temple in 586 B.C. Two lost LXX versions (both with epochs of 2,242 years) were hypothesized, the first, having a focal point of 622/621 B.C.; the second, 612 B.C. Hypothetical historical and philosophical rationales were explored. It was hypothesized that Jeremiah argued against implementation of some of the schemes.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["House, Colin L"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Religion, Old Testament Studies PhD","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Leona G. Running","Marion J. Merchant","Roy Naden"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1988,"date_issued":"1988-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"1988-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:54:03Z","subjects":["Biblical Studies","Religion"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/455","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Leona G. Running","Marion J. Merchant","Roy Naden"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["House, Colin L"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Religion, Old Testament Studies PhD"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Biblical Studies","Religion"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/455"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p><em>Problem</em>. The research problem of this study has been, How might church pastors and college Bible teachers answer questions from members/students regarding the three numerically disparate versions of Gen 5 and 11b?</p> <p><em>Method.</em> The categories of chronological data investigated were: prepaternal, remainder, life span, <em>anno mundi</em>, and postflood birth and death. Analysis preceded synthesis, and the formulation of hypotheses followed the investigation of the data. It was assumed that the necessary arithmetic commonly used within Torah was available to the ordinary reader. In hypothetical reconstructions, investigation was confined to extant variants rather than fictitious numbers.</p> <p><em>Findings</em>. An interlocking formula notwithstanding, the prepaternal data of Gen 5 and 11b were found to be artificial and unilaterally derivative, that is, LXXA contained data which SP rearranged and the highly schematized MT later drew upon both LXXA and SP for its arrangement. Differences in each version's data were found to be directly related to epochal calculations pivoting on the flood. LXXA arranged the data into epochs of 2,262 years, ending with 723/722 B.C.; SP, into epochs of 1,307 years, to coincide with the death of Joseph on Egypt; and MT, into epochs of 1,657 years, climaxing with the destruction of the temple in 586 B.C. Two lost LXX versions (both with epochs of 2,242 years) were hypothesized, the first, having a focal point of 622/621 B.C.; the second, 612 B.C. Hypothetical historical and philosophical rationales were explored. It was hypothesized that Jeremiah argued against implementation of some of the schemes.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Successive, Corresponding Epochal Arrangement of the \"Chronogenealogies\" of Genesis 5 and 11B in the Three Textual Traditions : LXXA, SP, and MT"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Leona G. Running","Marion J. Merchant","Roy Naden"],"dc:creator":["House, Colin L"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p><em>Problem</em>. The research problem of this study has been, How might church pastors and college Bible teachers answer questions from members/students regarding the three numerically disparate versions of Gen 5 and 11b?</p> <p><em>Method.</em> The categories of chronological data investigated were: prepaternal, remainder, life span, <em>anno mundi</em>, and postflood birth and death. Analysis preceded synthesis, and the formulation of hypotheses followed the investigation of the data. It was assumed that the necessary arithmetic commonly used within Torah was available to the ordinary reader. In hypothetical reconstructions, investigation was confined to extant variants rather than fictitious numbers.</p> <p><em>Findings</em>. An interlocking formula notwithstanding, the prepaternal data of Gen 5 and 11b were found to be artificial and unilaterally derivative, that is, LXXA contained data which SP rearranged and the highly schematized MT later drew upon both LXXA and SP for its arrangement. Differences in each version's data were found to be directly related to epochal calculations pivoting on the flood. LXXA arranged the data into epochs of 2,262 years, ending with 723/722 B.C.; SP, into epochs of 1,307 years, to coincide with the death of Joseph on Egypt; and MT, into epochs of 1,657 years, climaxing with the destruction of the temple in 586 B.C. Two lost LXX versions (both with epochs of 2,242 years) were hypothesized, the first, having a focal point of 622/621 B.C.; the second, 612 B.C. Hypothetical historical and philosophical rationales were explored. It was hypothesized that Jeremiah argued against implementation of some of the schemes.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/455"],"dc:subject":["Biblical Studies","Religion"],"dc:title":["The Successive, Corresponding Epochal Arrangement of the \"Chronogenealogies\" of Genesis 5 and 11B in the Three Textual Traditions : LXXA, SP, and MT"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Religion, Old Testament Studies PhD"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:54:03Z"}