Andrews University
The Classification of the Greek Manuscripts of the Epistle of James
Abstract
dc:description.abstract<p>Although a significant number of the Greek manuscripts of the Epistles of I and II Peter, I, II, and III John, and Jude have recently received long overdue classification, only a very few Greek manuscripts of the Epistle of James have been given comparable treatment.</p> <p>In this dissertation, we have sought to rectify this situation by classifying 86 Greek manuscripts of the Epistle of James – primarily according to their phonetic relationships and only secondarily according to their text-types.</p> <p>In order to accomplish this, we have made use of new computer methods.</p> <p>In a recent dissertation on the classification of 81 Greek manuscripts of the Johannine epistles, W.L. Richards employed a computer to form “tentative groupings” by Quantitative Analysis. Theses tentative groupings served as the basis of his classification which was determined ultimately by applying (without the aid of a computer) the Claremont Profile Method.</p> <p>We have taken both these procedures and combined them into a single program; and have, by means of a computer, applied this program to the raw data of our collations, and have thereby produced both the dendrographic charts and the “merge” tables which serve as the basis of our classification.</p> <p>An analysis of these dendrograms and merge tables indicates three major manuscript groupings: (A) Group 2 (consisting of 10 manuscripts [01-2298]). This group is probably Alexandrian in text-type. (B) Group 7 (consisting of 67 manuscripts [049-876] which may be conveniently divided into 11 subgroups [subgroups 7<sup>a-k</sup>]). Subgroups 7<sup>a-h</sup> are probably Byzantine in text-type. While subgroups 7<sup>i-k</sup> have a distinct orientation towards the major representatives of the Byzantine text-type, they also show certain independence in the direction of the Alexandrian text traditions. (C) Group 37 (consisting of 9 manuscripts [522-1505]). This group is patently independent of both the Byzantine and the Alexandrian text traditions.</p>
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Doctor of Philosophy
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Dissertation
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Religion, New Testament PhD
- Year
- 1979
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Awoniyi, Joel D.
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- James J.C. Cox
- Lawrence T. Geraty
- George E. Rice
Subjects
dc:subject × 2Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/10
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:digitalcommons.andrews.edu:dissertations-1009