{"id":{"repo_id":"alabama","oai_identifier":"oai:ir.ua.edu:123456789/9863"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/alabama/oai:ir.ua.edu:123456789/9863","repository":{"repo_id":"alabama","name":"University of Alabama","base_url":"https://ir-api.ua.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Identifying and Understanding Examinee Behaviors in Item Response Data that Compromise Psychometric Quality","abstract":"My dissertation research explored responder behaviors (e.g., demonstrating response styles, carelessness, and possessing misconceptions) that compromise psychometric quality and impact the interpretation and use of assessment results. Identifying these behaviors can help researchers understand and minimize their potentially construct-irrelevant impact on the psychometric quality of measurement procedures. In three studies related to response quality, we analyzed item response data in terms of subgroups and in terms of missingness levels respectively to evaluate the sensitivity of item response theory (IRT) indicators to response characteristics that can compromise psychometric quality; we also validated a diagnostic classification model (DCM) aiming to diagnose the presence of misconceptions.","abstract_html":"My dissertation research explored responder behaviors (e.g., demonstrating response styles, carelessness, and possessing misconceptions) that compromise psychometric quality and impact the interpretation and use of assessment results. Identifying these behaviors can help researchers understand and minimize their potentially construct-irrelevant impact on the psychometric quality of measurement procedures. In three studies related to response quality, we analyzed item response data in terms of subgroups and in terms of missingness levels respectively to evaluate the sensitivity of item response theory (IRT) indicators to response characteristics that can compromise psychometric quality; we also validated a diagnostic classification model (DCM) aiming to diagnose the presence of misconceptions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ge, Yuan"],"institution":"University of Alabama Libraries","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Roussos, Louis","Ma, Wenchao","Guo, Wenjing","Man, Kaiwen"],"advisors":["Wind, Stefanie A"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022","date_published":"2022","updated_at":"2026-07-27T18:44:27Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en_US","English"],"rights":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://purl.lib.ua.edu/186751","u0015_0000001_0004575","Ge_alatus_0004D_15051"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://purl.lib.ua.edu/186751","href":"http://purl.lib.ua.edu/186751","code":true},{"text":"u0015_0000001_0004575","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"Ge_alatus_0004D_15051","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/9863","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Roussos, Louis","Ma, Wenchao","Guo, Wenjing","Man, Kaiwen"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Wind, Stefanie A"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["University of Alabama Tuscaloosa"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ge, Yuan"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2023-01-27"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2023-01-27"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2022"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Alabama Libraries"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["thesis","text"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://purl.lib.ua.edu/186751","u0015_0000001_0004575","Ge_alatus_0004D_15051"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/9863"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["My dissertation research explored responder behaviors (e.g., demonstrating response styles, carelessness, and possessing misconceptions) that compromise psychometric quality and impact the interpretation and use of assessment results. Identifying these behaviors can help researchers understand and minimize their potentially construct-irrelevant impact on the psychometric quality of measurement procedures. In three studies related to response quality, we analyzed item response data in terms of subgroups and in terms of missingness levels respectively to evaluate the sensitivity of item response theory (IRT) indicators to response characteristics that can compromise psychometric quality; we also validated a diagnostic classification model (DCM) aiming to diagnose the presence of misconceptions."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["electronic"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Identifying and Understanding Examinee Behaviors in Item Response Data that Compromise Psychometric Quality"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Roussos, Louis","Ma, Wenchao","Guo, Wenjing","Man, Kaiwen"],"dc:contributor.advisor":["Wind, Stefanie A"],"dc:contributor.other":["University of Alabama Tuscaloosa"],"dc:creator":["Ge, Yuan"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2023-01-27"],"dc:date.available":["2023-01-27"],"dc:date.issued":["2022"],"dc:description":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"],"dc:description.abstract":["My dissertation research explored responder behaviors (e.g., demonstrating response styles, carelessness, and possessing misconceptions) that compromise psychometric quality and impact the interpretation and use of assessment results. Identifying these behaviors can help researchers understand and minimize their potentially construct-irrelevant impact on the psychometric quality of measurement procedures. In three studies related to response quality, we analyzed item response data in terms of subgroups and in terms of missingness levels respectively to evaluate the sensitivity of item response theory (IRT) indicators to response characteristics that can compromise psychometric quality; we also validated a diagnostic classification model (DCM) aiming to diagnose the presence of misconceptions."],"dc:format.medium":["electronic"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["http://purl.lib.ua.edu/186751","u0015_0000001_0004575","Ge_alatus_0004D_15051"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/9863"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["University of Alabama Libraries"],"dc:rights":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."],"dc:title":["Identifying and Understanding Examinee Behaviors in Item Response Data that Compromise Psychometric Quality"],"dc:type":["thesis","text"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T18:44:27Z"}