Back to results

University of Alabama Libraries

To flatter the jury: ingratiation effects during closing arguments

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

ABSTRACT The current study investigated the effect of defense attorney ingratiation during closing arguments of criminal trials. Previous research has shown ingratiation to be a powerful tool of social persuasion across many different settings. In the current study, participants read a vignette of a criminal case and then saw a videotaped presentation of closing arguments from actors portraying the prosecutor and defense attorneys. The defense attorney's closing argument contained either no, low, moderate or high levels of ingratiation. Results revealed that ingratiation had a significant effect on juror ratings of attorney attractiveness, trustworthiness, likeability, confidence, and overall credibility. As ingratiation increased ratings of attractiveness, trustworthiness, likeability and credibility increased whereas ratings of confidence decreased. Ingratiation did not significantly affect ratings of guilt directly; however, the relationship between ingratiation and guilt was significantly mediated by ratings of attorney attractiveness, trustworthiness, and confidence. Higher levels of these traits significantly lowered mock-jurors' ratings of the defendant's guilt. Finally, contrary to expectations, analyses revealed that self-esteem, self-efficacy, and the personality domains of extraversion and neuroticism were unrelated to ratings of attorney characteristics. The personality domains of openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness were able to significantly predict ratings of several attorney characteristics. Implications for the use of ingratiation during closing arguments of trials are discussed.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher
University of Alabama Libraries
Year dc:date.issued
2009

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Ziemke, Mitchell H.
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Brodsky, Stanley L.
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Hamilton, James C.
  • Colquitt, Joseph A.

Subjects

dc:subject × 2

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated.
Language dc:language.iso
en_US, English

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Dc Identifier Other
u0015_0000001_0000115
Ziemke_alatus_0004M_10058
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:ir.ua.edu:123456789/622

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Alabama
Base URL
ir-api.ua.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Ziemke, Mitchell H.. To flatter the jury: ingratiation effects during closing arguments. University of Alabama Libraries, 2009. https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/622