The victim role: an exploration into descriptions and evaluations of victims
type: CreativeWork
description: People agree that legitimate victims ought to be helped and illegitimate victims ought to be punished. Yet, people disagree about who is a legitimate victim. Victimologists theorize that legitimate occupants of the victim role possess characteristics which make them worthy of sympathy. However, this hypothesis is untested. Social contract theory posits that people are suspicious of social exchanges; claims to the victim role activate a social contract that requires others to engage in a social exchange. Thus, people may seek to disqualify victimization claims, but may acknowledge victims as legitimate when they fail to find delegitimizing evidence. Research indicates that individual differences in moral values, just world beliefs, and political values may influence reactions to victims. An individual’s moral values and political values may determine how they conceptualize the victim role. Individuals with strong just world beliefs are more likely to seek out ways to blame victims. This dissertation empirically examined how individuals describe victims and people’s tendency to be suspicious of claims to the victim role. Study 1 examined the language used to describe victims and how moral values, just world beliefs, and political values were related to these descriptions. Results indicated that the victim role comprises meaningful and intuitive concepts such as innocence, vulnerability, experiencing harm, and helplessness. Illegitimate victims were described as phony victims who were attention seekers. Legitimate victims were defined by their situation. Illegitimate victims were defined characteristically as frauds, fakers, and liars. Moral values related to harm, fairness, and purity were used to describe victims. Study 2 tested whether people seek to confirm or disconfirm claims to the victim role. Participants generally sought to confirm claims. However, Democrats preferred confirming evidence, whereas Republicans preferred disconfirming evidence. The evidence cont…
abstract: People agree that legitimate victims ought to be helped and illegitimate victims ought to be punished. Yet, people disagree about who is a legitimate victim. Victimologists theorize that legitimate occupants of the victim role possess characteristics which make them worthy of sympathy. However, this hypothesis is untested. Social contract theory posits that people are suspicious of social exchanges; claims to the victim role activate a social contract that requires others to engage in a social exchange. Thus, people may seek to disqualify victimization claims, but may acknowledge victims as legitimate when they fail to find delegitimizing evidence. Research indicates that individual differences in moral values, just world beliefs, and political values may influence reactions to victims. An individual’s moral values and political values may determine how they conceptualize the victim role. Individuals with strong just world beliefs are more likely to seek out ways to blame victims. This dissertation empirically examined how individuals describe victims and people’s tendency to be suspicious of claims to the victim role. Study 1 examined the language used to describe victims and how moral values, just world beliefs, and political values were related to these descriptions. Results indicated that the victim role comprises meaningful and intuitive concepts such as innocence, vulnerability, experiencing harm, and helplessness. Illegitimate victims were described as phony victims who were attention seekers. Legitimate victims were defined by their situation. Illegitimate victims were defined characteristically as frauds, fakers, and liars. Moral values related to harm, fairness, and purity were used to describe victims. Study 2 tested whether people seek to confirm or disconfirm claims to the victim role. Participants generally sought to confirm claims. However, Democrats preferred confirming evidence, whereas Republicans preferred disconfirming evidence. The evidence cont…
author: Lewis, Jerome
language: en_US
language: English
keywords: Psychology, Sociology
date published: 2017
date modified: 2026-07-27T18:44:07Z
provider: University of Alabama
publisher: Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations
type: WebPage
source organization: University of Alabama Libraries