{"id":{"repo_id":"alabama","oai_identifier":"oai:ir.ua.edu:123456789/13827"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/alabama/oai:ir.ua.edu:123456789/13827","repository":{"repo_id":"alabama","name":"University of Alabama","base_url":"https://ir-api.ua.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Representations of Second Language Writing and Writers in Academic Discourse: a Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study","abstract":"This study examines diachronic lexical variation in second language writing (SLW) research and the discursive representations of second language (L2) writing and writers in the field’s academic discourse as captured in a purpose-built specialized corpus of the Journal of Second Language Writing (1995-2022). The first phase of the analysis identified high-frequency lexical items that have significantly increased and decreased in use across seven periods: 1995-1998, 1999-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2010, 2011-2014, 2015-2018, and 2019-2022. Coefficient of variance (CV) and Kendall’s tau scores were calculated to evaluate diachronic changes and the trajectories of these shifts. Collocation, concordance, and further qualitative analyses of select lexical items were performed to uncover possible factors that have influenced the changes. In the second phase of the inquiry, strong collocates of the key target words “writing” and “writer(s)” were first established through the cubed mutual information (MI3) metric. Subsequently, the analysis identified collocates that have displayed the most significant growth and decline across the seven periods through CV and Kendall’s tau measures. Concordance analysis and qualitative interpretation of select lexical items in the context of applied linguistics and second language writing scholarship were also done. The study found an increased focus on multimodality; a shift from fixed to fluid framings of L2 writing and writers; and an increase in nuanced terms as well as a decrease in essentialist ones. The current work emphasizes the need for critical awareness among SLW researchers in using more careful and inclusive language choices. Other implications and suggestions for further research are discussed in the final chapter.","abstract_html":"This study examines diachronic lexical variation in second language writing (SLW) research and the discursive representations of second language (L2) writing and writers in the field’s academic discourse as captured in a purpose-built specialized corpus of the Journal of Second Language Writing (1995-2022). The first phase of the analysis identified high-frequency lexical items that have significantly increased and decreased in use across seven periods: 1995-1998, 1999-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2010, 2011-2014, 2015-2018, and 2019-2022. Coefficient of variance (CV) and Kendall’s tau scores were calculated to evaluate diachronic changes and the trajectories of these shifts. Collocation, concordance, and further qualitative analyses of select lexical items were performed to uncover possible factors that have influenced the changes. In the second phase of the inquiry, strong collocates of the key target words “writing” and “writer(s)” were first established through the cubed mutual information (MI3) metric. Subsequently, the analysis identified collocates that have displayed the most significant growth and decline across the seven periods through CV and Kendall’s tau measures. Concordance analysis and qualitative interpretation of select lexical items in the context of applied linguistics and second language writing scholarship were also done. The study found an increased focus on multimodality; a shift from fixed to fluid framings of L2 writing and writers; and an increase in nuanced terms as well as a decrease in essentialist ones. The current work emphasizes the need for critical awareness among SLW researchers in using more careful and inclusive language choices. Other implications and suggestions for further research are discussed in the final chapter.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Adebayo, Qudus Ayinde"],"institution":"University of Alabama Libraries","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Worden-Chambers, Dorothy","Crane, Corinne"],"advisors":["Poole, Robert"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024","date_published":"2024","updated_at":"2026-07-27T18:44:22Z","subjects":["corpus linguistics","corpus-assisted discourse study","diachronic analysis","representations","second language writing"],"languages":["en_US","English"],"rights":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["1053405"],"render_values":[{"text":"1053405","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/13827","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Worden-Chambers, Dorothy","Crane, Corinne"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Poole, Robert"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Adebayo, Qudus Ayinde"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2024-06-14T17:30:19Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["6/12/2029"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2024"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Alabama Libraries"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["thesis","text"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["corpus linguistics","corpus-assisted discourse study","diachronic analysis","representations","second language writing"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["1053405"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/13827"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study examines diachronic lexical variation in second language writing (SLW) research and the discursive representations of second language (L2) writing and writers in the field’s academic discourse as captured in a purpose-built specialized corpus of the Journal of Second Language Writing (1995-2022). The first phase of the analysis identified high-frequency lexical items that have significantly increased and decreased in use across seven periods: 1995-1998, 1999-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2010, 2011-2014, 2015-2018, and 2019-2022. Coefficient of variance (CV) and Kendall’s tau scores were calculated to evaluate diachronic changes and the trajectories of these shifts. Collocation, concordance, and further qualitative analyses of select lexical items were performed to uncover possible factors that have influenced the changes. In the second phase of the inquiry, strong collocates of the key target words “writing” and “writer(s)” were first established through the cubed mutual information (MI3) metric. Subsequently, the analysis identified collocates that have displayed the most significant growth and decline across the seven periods through CV and Kendall’s tau measures. Concordance analysis and qualitative interpretation of select lexical items in the context of applied linguistics and second language writing scholarship were also done. The study found an increased focus on multimodality; a shift from fixed to fluid framings of L2 writing and writers; and an increase in nuanced terms as well as a decrease in essentialist ones. The current work emphasizes the need for critical awareness among SLW researchers in using more careful and inclusive language choices. Other implications and suggestions for further research are discussed in the final chapter."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["electronic"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Representations of Second Language Writing and Writers in Academic Discourse: a Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Worden-Chambers, Dorothy","Crane, Corinne"],"dc:contributor.advisor":["Poole, Robert"],"dc:creator":["Adebayo, Qudus Ayinde"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2024-06-14T17:30:19Z"],"dc:date.available":["6/12/2029"],"dc:date.issued":["2024"],"dc:description":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"],"dc:description.abstract":["This study examines diachronic lexical variation in second language writing (SLW) research and the discursive representations of second language (L2) writing and writers in the field’s academic discourse as captured in a purpose-built specialized corpus of the Journal of Second Language Writing (1995-2022). The first phase of the analysis identified high-frequency lexical items that have significantly increased and decreased in use across seven periods: 1995-1998, 1999-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2010, 2011-2014, 2015-2018, and 2019-2022. Coefficient of variance (CV) and Kendall’s tau scores were calculated to evaluate diachronic changes and the trajectories of these shifts. Collocation, concordance, and further qualitative analyses of select lexical items were performed to uncover possible factors that have influenced the changes. In the second phase of the inquiry, strong collocates of the key target words “writing” and “writer(s)” were first established through the cubed mutual information (MI3) metric. Subsequently, the analysis identified collocates that have displayed the most significant growth and decline across the seven periods through CV and Kendall’s tau measures. Concordance analysis and qualitative interpretation of select lexical items in the context of applied linguistics and second language writing scholarship were also done. The study found an increased focus on multimodality; a shift from fixed to fluid framings of L2 writing and writers; and an increase in nuanced terms as well as a decrease in essentialist ones. The current work emphasizes the need for critical awareness among SLW researchers in using more careful and inclusive language choices. Other implications and suggestions for further research are discussed in the final chapter."],"dc:format.medium":["electronic"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["1053405"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/13827"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["University of Alabama Libraries"],"dc:rights":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."],"dc:subject":["corpus linguistics","corpus-assisted discourse study","diachronic analysis","representations","second language writing"],"dc:title":["Representations of Second Language Writing and Writers in Academic Discourse: a Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study"],"dc:type":["thesis","text"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T18:44:22Z"}