{"id":{"repo_id":"alabama","oai_identifier":"oai:ir.ua.edu:123456789/1130"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/alabama/oai:ir.ua.edu:123456789/1130","repository":{"repo_id":"alabama","name":"University of Alabama","base_url":"https://ir-api.ua.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"A national study of state tax appropriations for capital needs in public higher education","abstract":"This study investigated the relationship of key issues related to capital and operating budget practices of state tax appropriations and policies at the state level, including new facilities construction, renovation, replacement and renewal which may exist between and among states by governance structure. Recognized \"good practices\" in capital planning and allocation processes and funding mechanisms recommended by experts were also examined. The data collection methodology employed by Derrick A. Manns for his FY1997 and FY2003 studies were used to allow for comparisons to FY2008 data collected by the researcher. The statewide governance typology developed by Aims McGuinness that distinguishes between governing and coordinating boards was used to see if tighter state control in the form of consolidated governing boards might equate to higher levels of good practices with regards to facilities in public higher education. Key findings include: (1) only half (18 out of 39) of responding states have a long range state master plan for facilities; (2) the majority of states do not conduct recommended periodic facilities audits; and (3) the total deferred maintenance has more than doubled from FY1997 to FY2008. Key conclusions include: (1) A major facilities information gap exists, with missing data at the federal and state levels; and (2) From FY1997 to FY2008, while the total US population grew by 36 million or 13.6%, and headcount enrollment in public higher education grew by 22.8%, state tax appropriations for public higher education operating budgets grew by only 21% and in the 18 states that provided data, state tax appropriations for capital budgets increased by 80%. However, this increase is tempered by the low initial amounts of capital appropriations, and the fact that no major federal investments in higher education facilities to spur matching state action to build up public higher education's physical infrastructure occurred, as did in the Baby Boom era (1965-73). While headcount enrollment increased by 2.5 million or 22.8%, no significant federal investments and only limited state investments in public higher education's physical infrastructure occurred. All-time record enrollment increases occurred simultaneously to an escalation of deferred maintenance. While state governance structures are stable over time, the practices and policies of capital budgeting are highly varied, and tighter state control in the form of consolidated governing boards does not necessarily equate to higher levels of good practices with regards to facilities in public higher education.","abstract_html":"This study investigated the relationship of key issues related to capital and operating budget practices of state tax appropriations and policies at the state level, including new facilities construction, renovation, replacement and renewal which may exist between and among states by governance structure. Recognized "good practices" in capital planning and allocation processes and funding mechanisms recommended by experts were also examined. The data collection methodology employed by Derrick A. Manns for his FY1997 and FY2003 studies were used to allow for comparisons to FY2008 data collected by the researcher. The statewide governance typology developed by Aims McGuinness that distinguishes between governing and coordinating boards was used to see if tighter state control in the form of consolidated governing boards might equate to higher levels of good practices with regards to facilities in public higher education. Key findings include: (1) only half (18 out of 39) of responding states have a long range state master plan for facilities; (2) the majority of states do not conduct recommended periodic facilities audits; and (3) the total deferred maintenance has more than doubled from FY1997 to FY2008. Key conclusions include: (1) A major facilities information gap exists, with missing data at the federal and state levels; and (2) From FY1997 to FY2008, while the total US population grew by 36 million or 13.6%, and headcount enrollment in public higher education grew by 22.8%, state tax appropriations for public higher education operating budgets grew by only 21% and in the 18 states that provided data, state tax appropriations for capital budgets increased by 80%. However, this increase is tempered by the low initial amounts of capital appropriations, and the fact that no major federal investments in higher education facilities to spur matching state action to build up public higher education's physical infrastructure occurred, as did in the Baby Boom era (1965-73). While headcount enrollment increased by 2.5 million or 22.8%, no significant federal investments and only limited state investments in public higher education's physical infrastructure occurred. All-time record enrollment increases occurred simultaneously to an escalation of deferred maintenance. While state governance structures are stable over time, the practices and policies of capital budgeting are highly varied, and tighter state control in the form of consolidated governing boards does not necessarily equate to higher levels of good practices with regards to facilities in public higher education.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Harris, Annie Delphine"],"institution":"University of Alabama Libraries","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Cashman, James F.","Hardy, David E.","Palmer, James C.","Nash, Charles R.","Manns, Derrick A."],"advisors":["Katsinas, Stephen G."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011","date_published":"2011","updated_at":"2026-07-27T18:44:09Z","subjects":["Higher education administration","Education policy","Management"],"languages":["en_US","English"],"rights":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["u0015_0000001_0000625","Harris_alatus_0004D_10739"],"render_values":[{"text":"u0015_0000001_0000625","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"Harris_alatus_0004D_10739","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/1130","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Cashman, James F.","Hardy, David E.","Palmer, James C.","Nash, Charles R.","Manns, Derrick A."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Katsinas, Stephen G."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.other","label":"Dc Contributor Other","values":["University of Alabama Tuscaloosa"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Harris, Annie Delphine"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2017-03-01T14:42:18Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-03-01T14:42:18Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2011"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Alabama Libraries"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["thesis","text"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Higher education administration","Education policy","Management"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["u0015_0000001_0000625","Harris_alatus_0004D_10739"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/1130"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study investigated the relationship of key issues related to capital and operating budget practices of state tax appropriations and policies at the state level, including new facilities construction, renovation, replacement and renewal which may exist between and among states by governance structure. Recognized \"good practices\" in capital planning and allocation processes and funding mechanisms recommended by experts were also examined. The data collection methodology employed by Derrick A. Manns for his FY1997 and FY2003 studies were used to allow for comparisons to FY2008 data collected by the researcher. The statewide governance typology developed by Aims McGuinness that distinguishes between governing and coordinating boards was used to see if tighter state control in the form of consolidated governing boards might equate to higher levels of good practices with regards to facilities in public higher education. Key findings include: (1) only half (18 out of 39) of responding states have a long range state master plan for facilities; (2) the majority of states do not conduct recommended periodic facilities audits; and (3) the total deferred maintenance has more than doubled from FY1997 to FY2008. Key conclusions include: (1) A major facilities information gap exists, with missing data at the federal and state levels; and (2) From FY1997 to FY2008, while the total US population grew by 36 million or 13.6%, and headcount enrollment in public higher education grew by 22.8%, state tax appropriations for public higher education operating budgets grew by only 21% and in the 18 states that provided data, state tax appropriations for capital budgets increased by 80%. However, this increase is tempered by the low initial amounts of capital appropriations, and the fact that no major federal investments in higher education facilities to spur matching state action to build up public higher education's physical infrastructure occurred, as did in the Baby Boom era (1965-73). While headcount enrollment increased by 2.5 million or 22.8%, no significant federal investments and only limited state investments in public higher education's physical infrastructure occurred. All-time record enrollment increases occurred simultaneously to an escalation of deferred maintenance. While state governance structures are stable over time, the practices and policies of capital budgeting are highly varied, and tighter state control in the form of consolidated governing boards does not necessarily equate to higher levels of good practices with regards to facilities in public higher education."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["electronic"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A national study of state tax appropriations for capital needs in public higher education"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Cashman, James F.","Hardy, David E.","Palmer, James C.","Nash, Charles R.","Manns, Derrick A."],"dc:contributor.advisor":["Katsinas, Stephen G."],"dc:contributor.other":["University of Alabama Tuscaloosa"],"dc:creator":["Harris, Annie Delphine"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2017-03-01T14:42:18Z"],"dc:date.available":["2017-03-01T14:42:18Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2011"],"dc:description":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"],"dc:description.abstract":["This study investigated the relationship of key issues related to capital and operating budget practices of state tax appropriations and policies at the state level, including new facilities construction, renovation, replacement and renewal which may exist between and among states by governance structure. Recognized \"good practices\" in capital planning and allocation processes and funding mechanisms recommended by experts were also examined. The data collection methodology employed by Derrick A. Manns for his FY1997 and FY2003 studies were used to allow for comparisons to FY2008 data collected by the researcher. The statewide governance typology developed by Aims McGuinness that distinguishes between governing and coordinating boards was used to see if tighter state control in the form of consolidated governing boards might equate to higher levels of good practices with regards to facilities in public higher education. Key findings include: (1) only half (18 out of 39) of responding states have a long range state master plan for facilities; (2) the majority of states do not conduct recommended periodic facilities audits; and (3) the total deferred maintenance has more than doubled from FY1997 to FY2008. Key conclusions include: (1) A major facilities information gap exists, with missing data at the federal and state levels; and (2) From FY1997 to FY2008, while the total US population grew by 36 million or 13.6%, and headcount enrollment in public higher education grew by 22.8%, state tax appropriations for public higher education operating budgets grew by only 21% and in the 18 states that provided data, state tax appropriations for capital budgets increased by 80%. However, this increase is tempered by the low initial amounts of capital appropriations, and the fact that no major federal investments in higher education facilities to spur matching state action to build up public higher education's physical infrastructure occurred, as did in the Baby Boom era (1965-73). While headcount enrollment increased by 2.5 million or 22.8%, no significant federal investments and only limited state investments in public higher education's physical infrastructure occurred. All-time record enrollment increases occurred simultaneously to an escalation of deferred maintenance. While state governance structures are stable over time, the practices and policies of capital budgeting are highly varied, and tighter state control in the form of consolidated governing boards does not necessarily equate to higher levels of good practices with regards to facilities in public higher education."],"dc:format.medium":["electronic"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["u0015_0000001_0000625","Harris_alatus_0004D_10739"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/1130"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["University of Alabama Libraries"],"dc:rights":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."],"dc:subject":["Higher education administration","Education policy","Management"],"dc:title":["A national study of state tax appropriations for capital needs in public higher education"],"dc:type":["thesis","text"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T18:44:09Z"}