{"id":{"repo_id":"alabama","oai_identifier":"oai:ir.ua.edu:123456789/10484"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/alabama/oai:ir.ua.edu:123456789/10484","repository":{"repo_id":"alabama","name":"University of Alabama","base_url":"https://ir-api.ua.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"If Words Could Speak: a Discourse Analysis of Emails from Global Virtual Teams","abstract":"The increase in virtual and remote work has revealed how important it is to learn how to successfully navigate this newer and more prevalent form of collaborative work. The goal of the study was to examine how members of global virtual teams work together. The analysis looked at email communication from a 60-day period to gain a deeper understanding of how the team worked. A total of 873 emails from 4 global virtual teams were analyzed through discourse analysis to answer the questions how do GVTs construct shared meaning, understanding and a team culture through email interaction? How do members of GVT talk about work-related expectations? What are the cultural patterns at play in the discourse of GVTs? Results indicated that share meaning was constructed through strategies including (a) directly asking for clarification, (b) asking additional questions, (c) sharing suggestions and information, (d) confirming shared understanding, (e) offering information, (f) giving feedback, and (g) direct confirming statements. Work-related expectations talk included themes of (a) collaboration (including making suggestions, requests for action, and individual updates), (b) identifying problems, (c) sharing information (including discussions and decisions and agreement), (d) showing appreciation, (e) apologies, (f) demonstrating dependability, and (g) setting additional meetings. Differences in the cultures of team members did not play a role in their communication patterns. Results indicate how team members can construct shared understanding via email.Keywords: Global virtual teams, email, shared meaning, team culture","abstract_html":"The increase in virtual and remote work has revealed how important it is to learn how to successfully navigate this newer and more prevalent form of collaborative work. The goal of the study was to examine how members of global virtual teams work together. The analysis looked at email communication from a 60-day period to gain a deeper understanding of how the team worked. A total of 873 emails from 4 global virtual teams were analyzed through discourse analysis to answer the questions how do GVTs construct shared meaning, understanding and a team culture through email interaction? How do members of GVT talk about work-related expectations? What are the cultural patterns at play in the discourse of GVTs? Results indicated that share meaning was constructed through strategies including (a) directly asking for clarification, (b) asking additional questions, (c) sharing suggestions and information, (d) confirming shared understanding, (e) offering information, (f) giving feedback, and (g) direct confirming statements. Work-related expectations talk included themes of (a) collaboration (including making suggestions, requests for action, and individual updates), (b) identifying problems, (c) sharing information (including discussions and decisions and agreement), (d) showing appreciation, (e) apologies, (f) demonstrating dependability, and (g) setting additional meetings. Differences in the cultures of team members did not play a role in their communication patterns. Results indicate how team members can construct shared understanding via email.Keywords: Global virtual teams, email, shared meaning, team culture","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Keller, Marieke C."],"institution":"University of Alabama Libraries","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Chilcutt, Alexa S","Pederson, Joshua R","Horsley, J Suzanne","Naidoo, Jef S"],"advisors":["Meares, Mary M"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2023,"date_issued":"2023","date_published":"2023","updated_at":"2026-07-27T18:44:01Z","subjects":["Email","Global virtual teams","Shared meaning","Team Culture"],"languages":["en_US","English"],"rights":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://purl.lib.ua.edu/187849","u0015_0000001_0004671","Keller_alatus_0004D_15212"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://purl.lib.ua.edu/187849","href":"http://purl.lib.ua.edu/187849","code":true},{"text":"u0015_0000001_0004671","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"Keller_alatus_0004D_15212","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/10484","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Chilcutt, Alexa S","Pederson, Joshua R","Horsley, J Suzanne","Naidoo, Jef S"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Meares, Mary M"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Keller, Marieke C."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2023-08-03T18:42:28Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2023-08-03T18:42:28Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2023"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Alabama Libraries"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["thesis","text"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Email","Global virtual teams","Shared meaning","Team Culture"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["http://purl.lib.ua.edu/187849","u0015_0000001_0004671","Keller_alatus_0004D_15212"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/10484"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The increase in virtual and remote work has revealed how important it is to learn how to successfully navigate this newer and more prevalent form of collaborative work. The goal of the study was to examine how members of global virtual teams work together. The analysis looked at email communication from a 60-day period to gain a deeper understanding of how the team worked. A total of 873 emails from 4 global virtual teams were analyzed through discourse analysis to answer the questions how do GVTs construct shared meaning, understanding and a team culture through email interaction? How do members of GVT talk about work-related expectations? What are the cultural patterns at play in the discourse of GVTs? Results indicated that share meaning was constructed through strategies including (a) directly asking for clarification, (b) asking additional questions, (c) sharing suggestions and information, (d) confirming shared understanding, (e) offering information, (f) giving feedback, and (g) direct confirming statements. Work-related expectations talk included themes of (a) collaboration (including making suggestions, requests for action, and individual updates), (b) identifying problems, (c) sharing information (including discussions and decisions and agreement), (d) showing appreciation, (e) apologies, (f) demonstrating dependability, and (g) setting additional meetings. Differences in the cultures of team members did not play a role in their communication patterns. Results indicate how team members can construct shared understanding via email.Keywords: Global virtual teams, email, shared meaning, team culture"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["electronic"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["If Words Could Speak: a Discourse Analysis of Emails from Global Virtual Teams"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Chilcutt, Alexa S","Pederson, Joshua R","Horsley, J Suzanne","Naidoo, Jef S"],"dc:contributor.advisor":["Meares, Mary M"],"dc:creator":["Keller, Marieke C."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2023-08-03T18:42:28Z"],"dc:date.available":["2023-08-03T18:42:28Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2023"],"dc:description":["Electronic Thesis or Dissertation"],"dc:description.abstract":["The increase in virtual and remote work has revealed how important it is to learn how to successfully navigate this newer and more prevalent form of collaborative work. The goal of the study was to examine how members of global virtual teams work together. The analysis looked at email communication from a 60-day period to gain a deeper understanding of how the team worked. A total of 873 emails from 4 global virtual teams were analyzed through discourse analysis to answer the questions how do GVTs construct shared meaning, understanding and a team culture through email interaction? How do members of GVT talk about work-related expectations? What are the cultural patterns at play in the discourse of GVTs? Results indicated that share meaning was constructed through strategies including (a) directly asking for clarification, (b) asking additional questions, (c) sharing suggestions and information, (d) confirming shared understanding, (e) offering information, (f) giving feedback, and (g) direct confirming statements. Work-related expectations talk included themes of (a) collaboration (including making suggestions, requests for action, and individual updates), (b) identifying problems, (c) sharing information (including discussions and decisions and agreement), (d) showing appreciation, (e) apologies, (f) demonstrating dependability, and (g) setting additional meetings. Differences in the cultures of team members did not play a role in their communication patterns. Results indicate how team members can construct shared understanding via email.Keywords: Global virtual teams, email, shared meaning, team culture"],"dc:format.medium":["electronic"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["http://purl.lib.ua.edu/187849","u0015_0000001_0004671","Keller_alatus_0004D_15212"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/10484"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["University of Alabama Libraries"],"dc:rights":["All rights reserved by the author unless otherwise indicated."],"dc:subject":["Email","Global virtual teams","Shared meaning","Team Culture"],"dc:title":["If Words Could Speak: a Discourse Analysis of Emails from Global Virtual Teams"],"dc:type":["thesis","text"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T18:44:01Z"}