{"id":{"repo_id":"aachen","oai_identifier":"oai:publications.rwth-aachen.de:62571"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/aachen/oai:publications.rwth-aachen.de:62571","repository":{"repo_id":"aachen","name":"RWTH Aachen University","base_url":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/oai2d"},"display":{"title":"Nonresponse-Bias in einem Vorsorgeprogramm zur Früherkennung asbestbedingter Erkrankungen","abstract":"The objective of the study was to identify the reasons for non-response and differences in the characteristics between non-responder and responder in a screening program of asbestos exposed workers. 5192 former power plant workers were enrolled. They were categorized in risk classes in dependence of the risk to obtain lung cancer. All subjects were underwent medical examination including occupational history, medical anamnesis, a questioning of relevant symptoms, medical examination of thorax organs, spirometry and X-ray of the chest (posterior-anterior). Individuals of highest risk underwent low-dose multidetector-row CT instead of X-ray and their sputum was analyzed. Data of 1019 individuals with a middle age of 66 years (47-91) were analyzed. 839 participants take part in at least one examination, 180 were non-respondents. Reasons of non-response were refusal because of personal reasons (35%), illness (23.3%), death (16.7%) and difficulties in arrival (13.3%). In 11.7 percent it was impossible to get information about the reasons of non-response. Comparing characteristics of the non-responder to the participants of the screening program we assess that the non-responders were older and had a longer latency period. They had a longer pension time and a greater distance to the place of examination. In terms of time of asbestos exposure and smoking habits no differences were observed. We could demonstrate that an increasing age and a rising distance to the place of the examination affect negatively the chance of participation. They were no differences between non-responder and responder in the prevalence and incidence rate of lung cancer. In this cohort refusal, illness and death were the most common reasons for non-participation.","abstract_html":"The objective of the study was to identify the reasons for non-response and differences in the characteristics between non-responder and responder in a screening program of asbestos exposed workers. 5192 former power plant workers were enrolled. They were categorized in risk classes in dependence of the risk to obtain lung cancer. All subjects were underwent medical examination including occupational history, medical anamnesis, a questioning of relevant symptoms, medical examination of thorax organs, spirometry and X-ray of the chest (posterior-anterior). Individuals of highest risk underwent low-dose multidetector-row CT instead of X-ray and their sputum was analyzed. Data of 1019 individuals with a middle age of 66 years (47-91) were analyzed. 839 participants take part in at least one examination, 180 were non-respondents. Reasons of non-response were refusal because of personal reasons (35%), illness (23.3%), death (16.7%) and difficulties in arrival (13.3%). In 11.7 percent it was impossible to get information about the reasons of non-response. Comparing characteristics of the non-responder to the participants of the screening program we assess that the non-responders were older and had a longer latency period. They had a longer pension time and a greater distance to the place of examination. In terms of time of asbestos exposure and smoking habits no differences were observed. We could demonstrate that an increasing age and a rising distance to the place of the examination affect negatively the chance of participation. They were no differences between non-responder and responder in the prevalence and incidence rate of lung cancer. In this cohort refusal, illness and death were the most common reasons for non-participation.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Knoll, Lars"],"institution":"Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Kraus, Thomas"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2007,"date_issued":"2007","date_published":"2007","updated_at":"2026-07-30T19:43:28Z","subjects":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Bias","Reihenuntersuchung","Bronchialkrebs","Medizin","screening","lung cancer"],"languages":["ger"],"rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-124135%22"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-124135%22","href":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-124135%22","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/62571","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Kraus, Thomas"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Knoll, Lars"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:coverage","label":"Dc Coverage","values":["DE"]},{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2007"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-21469"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis","info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Bias","Reihenuntersuchung","Bronchialkrebs","Medizin","screening","lung cancer"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["ger"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/62571","https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-124135%22"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The objective of the study was to identify the reasons for non-response and differences in the characteristics between non-responder and responder in a screening program of asbestos exposed workers. 5192 former power plant workers were enrolled. They were categorized in risk classes in dependence of the risk to obtain lung cancer. All subjects were underwent medical examination including occupational history, medical anamnesis, a questioning of relevant symptoms, medical examination of thorax organs, spirometry and X-ray of the chest (posterior-anterior). Individuals of highest risk underwent low-dose multidetector-row CT instead of X-ray and their sputum was analyzed. Data of 1019 individuals with a middle age of 66 years (47-91) were analyzed. 839 participants take part in at least one examination, 180 were non-respondents. Reasons of non-response were refusal because of personal reasons (35%), illness (23.3%), death (16.7%) and difficulties in arrival (13.3%). In 11.7 percent it was impossible to get information about the reasons of non-response. Comparing characteristics of the non-responder to the participants of the screening program we assess that the non-responders were older and had a longer latency period. They had a longer pension time and a greater distance to the place of examination. In terms of time of asbestos exposure and smoking habits no differences were observed. We could demonstrate that an increasing age and a rising distance to the place of the examination affect negatively the chance of participation. They were no differences between non-responder and responder in the prevalence and incidence rate of lung cancer. In this cohort refusal, illness and death were the most common reasons for non-participation."]},{"key":"dc:source","label":"Dc Source","values":["Aachen : Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University V, 114 S. : Ill., graph. Darst. (2007). = Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2007"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Nonresponse-Bias in einem Vorsorgeprogramm zur Früherkennung asbestbedingter Erkrankungen"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Kraus, Thomas"],"dc:coverage":["DE"],"dc:creator":["Knoll, Lars"],"dc:date":["2007"],"dc:description":["The objective of the study was to identify the reasons for non-response and differences in the characteristics between non-responder and responder in a screening program of asbestos exposed workers. 5192 former power plant workers were enrolled. They were categorized in risk classes in dependence of the risk to obtain lung cancer. All subjects were underwent medical examination including occupational history, medical anamnesis, a questioning of relevant symptoms, medical examination of thorax organs, spirometry and X-ray of the chest (posterior-anterior). Individuals of highest risk underwent low-dose multidetector-row CT instead of X-ray and their sputum was analyzed. Data of 1019 individuals with a middle age of 66 years (47-91) were analyzed. 839 participants take part in at least one examination, 180 were non-respondents. Reasons of non-response were refusal because of personal reasons (35%), illness (23.3%), death (16.7%) and difficulties in arrival (13.3%). In 11.7 percent it was impossible to get information about the reasons of non-response. Comparing characteristics of the non-responder to the participants of the screening program we assess that the non-responders were older and had a longer latency period. They had a longer pension time and a greater distance to the place of examination. In terms of time of asbestos exposure and smoking habits no differences were observed. We could demonstrate that an increasing age and a rising distance to the place of the examination affect negatively the chance of participation. They were no differences between non-responder and responder in the prevalence and incidence rate of lung cancer. In this cohort refusal, illness and death were the most common reasons for non-participation."],"dc:identifier":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/62571","https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-124135%22"],"dc:language":["ger"],"dc:publisher":["Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University"],"dc:relation":["info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-21469"],"dc:rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"],"dc:source":["Aachen : Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University V, 114 S. : Ill., graph. Darst. (2007). = Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2007"],"dc:subject":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Bias","Reihenuntersuchung","Bronchialkrebs","Medizin","screening","lung cancer"],"dc:title":["Nonresponse-Bias in einem Vorsorgeprogramm zur Früherkennung asbestbedingter Erkrankungen"],"dc:type":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis","info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-30T19:43:28Z"}