{"id":{"repo_id":"aachen","oai_identifier":"oai:publications.rwth-aachen.de:60842"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/aachen/oai:publications.rwth-aachen.de:60842","repository":{"repo_id":"aachen","name":"RWTH Aachen University","base_url":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/oai2d"},"display":{"title":"Logische Analyse und computer-basierte Operationalisierung der DSMIV-Kriterien als Basis einer Relevanzordnung im Sinne des Informationsgewinnes in Entscheidungsbäumen","abstract":"Classification systems in general and the DSM-IV in particular have a important significance in psychiatric diagnostic.In my doctorial thesis, I was discussing questions of the structure of the DSM-IV.To discuss those questions, I ordered the diagnosis criteria of the diseases anxiety disorders and somatoform disorders of the DSM-IV after the principals of the Information-gain- theory. Afterwards I compared the new order with the order given by the DSM-IV. A patient-based evaluation was not performed.The new, information-gain-based, order was possible with an assistant system, written by Dominik Lübbers in 2001. Its primary goal is to help the physician with differential diagnosis.It was possible to establish a database with all diagnosis and to transform them into the assistant system. With the assistant system, it was possible to calculate the information-gain data.The result of the calculation was, that the information-gain-based order is only in few diagnosis more useful, most of the time, the order in the DSM-IV is more useful. In most cases, where the order in the DSM-IV was more useful, an criterion for exclusion had a higher level in the information-gain-calculation.But there were also situations, where the information-gain-based order was more useful . In those cases, the diagnosis criteria in the DSM-IV were only a listing without structure","abstract_html":"Classification systems in general and the DSM-IV in particular have a important significance in psychiatric diagnostic.In my doctorial thesis, I was discussing questions of the structure of the DSM-IV.To discuss those questions, I ordered the diagnosis criteria of the diseases anxiety disorders and somatoform disorders of the DSM-IV after the principals of the Information-gain- theory. Afterwards I compared the new order with the order given by the DSM-IV. A patient-based evaluation was not performed.The new, information-gain-based, order was possible with an assistant system, written by Dominik Lübbers in 2001. Its primary goal is to help the physician with differential diagnosis.It was possible to establish a database with all diagnosis and to transform them into the assistant system. With the assistant system, it was possible to calculate the information-gain data.The result of the calculation was, that the information-gain-based order is only in few diagnosis more useful, most of the time, the order in the DSM-IV is more useful. In most cases, where the order in the DSM-IV was more useful, an criterion for exclusion had a higher level in the information-gain-calculation.But there were also situations, where the information-gain-based order was more useful . In those cases, the diagnosis criteria in the DSM-IV were only a listing without structure","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Meinhard, Daniel Thomas"],"institution":"Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Spitzer, Klaus"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2006,"date_issued":"2006","date_published":"2006","updated_at":"2026-07-30T19:43:02Z","subjects":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Medizin","Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 1994>","Operationalisierung","Entscheidungsbaum","ID3","Information-Gain","Relevanzordnung","relevance order"],"languages":["ger"],"rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-122530%22"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-122530%22","href":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-122530%22","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/60842","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Spitzer, Klaus"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Meinhard, Daniel Thomas"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:coverage","label":"Dc Coverage","values":["DE"]},{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2006"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-14270"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis","info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Medizin","Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 1994>","Operationalisierung","Entscheidungsbaum","ID3","Information-Gain","Relevanzordnung","relevance order"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["ger"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/60842","https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-122530%22"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Classification systems in general and the DSM-IV in particular have a important significance in psychiatric diagnostic.In my doctorial thesis, I was discussing questions of the structure of the DSM-IV.To discuss those questions, I ordered the diagnosis criteria of the diseases anxiety disorders and somatoform disorders of the DSM-IV after the principals of the Information-gain- theory. Afterwards I compared the new order with the order given by the DSM-IV. A patient-based evaluation was not performed.The new, information-gain-based, order was possible with an assistant system, written by Dominik Lübbers in 2001. Its primary goal is to help the physician with differential diagnosis.It was possible to establish a database with all diagnosis and to transform them into the assistant system. With the assistant system, it was possible to calculate the information-gain data.The result of the calculation was, that the information-gain-based order is only in few diagnosis more useful, most of the time, the order in the DSM-IV is more useful. In most cases, where the order in the DSM-IV was more useful, an criterion for exclusion had a higher level in the information-gain-calculation.But there were also situations, where the information-gain-based order was more useful . In those cases, the diagnosis criteria in the DSM-IV were only a listing without structure"]},{"key":"dc:source","label":"Dc Source","values":["Aachen : Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University VI, 171 S. : Ill. (2006). = Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2006"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Logische Analyse und computer-basierte Operationalisierung der DSMIV-Kriterien als Basis einer Relevanzordnung im Sinne des Informationsgewinnes in Entscheidungsbäumen"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Spitzer, Klaus"],"dc:coverage":["DE"],"dc:creator":["Meinhard, Daniel Thomas"],"dc:date":["2006"],"dc:description":["Classification systems in general and the DSM-IV in particular have a important significance in psychiatric diagnostic.In my doctorial thesis, I was discussing questions of the structure of the DSM-IV.To discuss those questions, I ordered the diagnosis criteria of the diseases anxiety disorders and somatoform disorders of the DSM-IV after the principals of the Information-gain- theory. Afterwards I compared the new order with the order given by the DSM-IV. A patient-based evaluation was not performed.The new, information-gain-based, order was possible with an assistant system, written by Dominik Lübbers in 2001. Its primary goal is to help the physician with differential diagnosis.It was possible to establish a database with all diagnosis and to transform them into the assistant system. With the assistant system, it was possible to calculate the information-gain data.The result of the calculation was, that the information-gain-based order is only in few diagnosis more useful, most of the time, the order in the DSM-IV is more useful. In most cases, where the order in the DSM-IV was more useful, an criterion for exclusion had a higher level in the information-gain-calculation.But there were also situations, where the information-gain-based order was more useful . In those cases, the diagnosis criteria in the DSM-IV were only a listing without structure"],"dc:identifier":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/60842","https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-122530%22"],"dc:language":["ger"],"dc:publisher":["Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University"],"dc:relation":["info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-14270"],"dc:rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"],"dc:source":["Aachen : Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University VI, 171 S. : Ill. (2006). = Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2006"],"dc:subject":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Medizin","Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 1994>","Operationalisierung","Entscheidungsbaum","ID3","Information-Gain","Relevanzordnung","relevance order"],"dc:title":["Logische Analyse und computer-basierte Operationalisierung der DSMIV-Kriterien als Basis einer Relevanzordnung im Sinne des Informationsgewinnes in Entscheidungsbäumen"],"dc:type":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis","info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-30T19:43:02Z"}