{"id":{"repo_id":"aachen","oai_identifier":"oai:publications.rwth-aachen.de:51890"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/aachen/oai:publications.rwth-aachen.de:51890","repository":{"repo_id":"aachen","name":"RWTH Aachen University","base_url":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/oai2d"},"display":{"title":"Retrospektive Vergleichsstudie über implantatverankerten Zahnersatz im zahnlosen Unterkiefer : subjektive Patientenevaluation seitens der Patienten","abstract":"Purpose: Aim of this survey was the comparison of the subjective evaluation about satisfaction with implant-anchored prosthetic treatment of 4 patient groups, which had been treated in the edentulous mandible according to the 4 “Aachen Treatment Concepts”. Materials and Methods: To accomplish this retrospective monocenter study a questionnaire with several categories was developed. The questionnaire was filled in by 100 patients (25 patients/group) who came to the clinic for recall appointments. Results: The descriptive and analytic statistical analysis of the data showed a high satisfaction rate with the implant-anchored dentures in all 4 groups (minimum >64% were very satisfied). Best evaluation was given to the fixed denture (concept IV). Satisfaction decreased significantly from concept IV to concept I. Conclusions: A high wearing comfort and a definite retention were more important to patients than the ease of maintenance of the new dentures. A correlation between gender and satisfaction could not be shown (p=0,4054).","abstract_html":"Purpose: Aim of this survey was the comparison of the subjective evaluation about satisfaction with implant-anchored prosthetic treatment of 4 patient groups, which had been treated in the edentulous mandible according to the 4 “Aachen Treatment Concepts”. Materials and Methods: To accomplish this retrospective monocenter study a questionnaire with several categories was developed. The questionnaire was filled in by 100 patients (25 patients/group) who came to the clinic for recall appointments. Results: The descriptive and analytic statistical analysis of the data showed a high satisfaction rate with the implant-anchored dentures in all 4 groups (minimum >64% were very satisfied). Best evaluation was given to the fixed denture (concept IV). Satisfaction decreased significantly from concept IV to concept I. Conclusions: A high wearing comfort and a definite retention were more important to patients than the ease of maintenance of the new dentures. A correlation between gender and satisfaction could not be shown (p=0,4054).","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Tuna, Taskin"],"institution":"Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Yildirim, Murat"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2006,"date_issued":"2006","date_published":"2006","updated_at":"2026-07-30T19:40:42Z","subjects":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Medizin","Zahnloser Kiefer","Patientenzufriedenheit","Dentale Implantate","Aachener Konzepte","edentulousness","patient satisfaction","dental implants","implant dentures","overdentures"],"languages":["ger"],"rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-114139%22"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-114139%22","href":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-114139%22","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/51890","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"source_record":{"url":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/oai2d?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&identifier=oai%3Apublications.rwth-aachen.de%3A51890","prefix":"oai_dc"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Yildirim, Murat"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Tuna, Taskin"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:coverage","label":"Dc Coverage","values":["DE"]},{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2006"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-17569"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis","info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Medizin","Zahnloser Kiefer","Patientenzufriedenheit","Dentale Implantate","Aachener Konzepte","edentulousness","patient satisfaction","dental implants","implant dentures","overdentures"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["ger"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/51890","https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-114139%22"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Purpose: Aim of this survey was the comparison of the subjective evaluation about satisfaction with implant-anchored prosthetic treatment of 4 patient groups, which had been treated in the edentulous mandible according to the 4 “Aachen Treatment Concepts”. Materials and Methods: To accomplish this retrospective monocenter study a questionnaire with several categories was developed. The questionnaire was filled in by 100 patients (25 patients/group) who came to the clinic for recall appointments. Results: The descriptive and analytic statistical analysis of the data showed a high satisfaction rate with the implant-anchored dentures in all 4 groups (minimum >64% were very satisfied). Best evaluation was given to the fixed denture (concept IV). Satisfaction decreased significantly from concept IV to concept I. Conclusions: A high wearing comfort and a definite retention were more important to patients than the ease of maintenance of the new dentures. A correlation between gender and satisfaction could not be shown (p=0,4054)."]},{"key":"dc:source","label":"Dc Source","values":["Aachen : Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University III, 181 S. : graph. Darst. (2006). = Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2006"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Retrospektive Vergleichsstudie über implantatverankerten Zahnersatz im zahnlosen Unterkiefer : subjektive Patientenevaluation seitens der Patienten"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Yildirim, Murat"],"dc:coverage":["DE"],"dc:creator":["Tuna, Taskin"],"dc:date":["2006"],"dc:description":["Purpose: Aim of this survey was the comparison of the subjective evaluation about satisfaction with implant-anchored prosthetic treatment of 4 patient groups, which had been treated in the edentulous mandible according to the 4 “Aachen Treatment Concepts”. Materials and Methods: To accomplish this retrospective monocenter study a questionnaire with several categories was developed. The questionnaire was filled in by 100 patients (25 patients/group) who came to the clinic for recall appointments. Results: The descriptive and analytic statistical analysis of the data showed a high satisfaction rate with the implant-anchored dentures in all 4 groups (minimum >64% were very satisfied). Best evaluation was given to the fixed denture (concept IV). Satisfaction decreased significantly from concept IV to concept I. Conclusions: A high wearing comfort and a definite retention were more important to patients than the ease of maintenance of the new dentures. A correlation between gender and satisfaction could not be shown (p=0,4054)."],"dc:identifier":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/51890","https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-114139%22"],"dc:language":["ger"],"dc:publisher":["Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University"],"dc:relation":["info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-17569"],"dc:rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"],"dc:source":["Aachen : Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University III, 181 S. : graph. Darst. (2006). = Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2006"],"dc:subject":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Medizin","Zahnloser Kiefer","Patientenzufriedenheit","Dentale Implantate","Aachener Konzepte","edentulousness","patient satisfaction","dental implants","implant dentures","overdentures"],"dc:title":["Retrospektive Vergleichsstudie über implantatverankerten Zahnersatz im zahnlosen Unterkiefer : subjektive Patientenevaluation seitens der Patienten"],"dc:type":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis","info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-30T19:40:42Z"}