{"id":{"repo_id":"aachen","oai_identifier":"oai:publications.rwth-aachen.de:51734"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/aachen/oai:publications.rwth-aachen.de:51734","repository":{"repo_id":"aachen","name":"RWTH Aachen University","base_url":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/oai2d"},"display":{"title":"Die Endoprothetik des oberen Sprunggelenkes : Metaanalyse der Sprunggelenkendoprothetik unter Anwendung eines Evaluations-Scores","abstract":"BACKGROUND: Following the failures of the first and the second generation of ankle joint endoprostheses, the newly developed third generation won increasing acceptance. Although there is a pronounced variance of the concepts in the literature search, so far no comparison for the fixation of these implants of the third generation has been conducted.MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the literature search available, results and complication rates of the implants of the third generation are compared. In order to make an exact analysis possible, a Complications-Revisions-Score was developed. This evaluation system focuses on the number of the complications and revisions in the post-operative process. The different follow-up examination times enter evaluation too. The studies with the selected endoprosthesis designs were subsequently analyzed with the help of the Complications-Revisions-Scores and received appropriate points of evaluation. Depending on the number of points obtained under the endoprosthesis designs, a ranking was provided based on the Complications-Revisions-Score.RESULTS: The literature search consisted of various databases such as PubMed and included the ankle joint endoprostheses of the third generation. Of a total of 53 publications concerning ankle-joint-Prosthetics, 26 studies dealt with the endoprostheses of the third generation. Of these, 23 studies with 8 different endoprostheses designs were included. After the application of the Complications-Revisions-Scores, the following implants showed small complication rates: New Jersey endoprosthesis (3.11 points), Buechel Pappas endoprosthesis (3.84 points) and the Salto endoprosthesis (4.31 points).CONCLUSION: The New Jersey, Buechel Pappas and the Salto endoprosthesis exhibited the smallest complication rates. The complication and revision rates appear to be adequately reflected in the newly developed score.","abstract_html":"BACKGROUND: Following the failures of the first and the second generation of ankle joint endoprostheses, the newly developed third generation won increasing acceptance. Although there is a pronounced variance of the concepts in the literature search, so far no comparison for the fixation of these implants of the third generation has been conducted.MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the literature search available, results and complication rates of the implants of the third generation are compared. In order to make an exact analysis possible, a Complications-Revisions-Score was developed. This evaluation system focuses on the number of the complications and revisions in the post-operative process. The different follow-up examination times enter evaluation too. The studies with the selected endoprosthesis designs were subsequently analyzed with the help of the Complications-Revisions-Scores and received appropriate points of evaluation. Depending on the number of points obtained under the endoprosthesis designs, a ranking was provided based on the Complications-Revisions-Score.RESULTS: The literature search consisted of various databases such as PubMed and included the ankle joint endoprostheses of the third generation. Of a total of 53 publications concerning ankle-joint-Prosthetics, 26 studies dealt with the endoprostheses of the third generation. Of these, 23 studies with 8 different endoprostheses designs were included. After the application of the Complications-Revisions-Scores, the following implants showed small complication rates: New Jersey endoprosthesis (3.11 points), Buechel Pappas endoprosthesis (3.84 points) and the Salto endoprosthesis (4.31 points).CONCLUSION: The New Jersey, Buechel Pappas and the Salto endoprosthesis exhibited the smallest complication rates. The complication and revision rates appear to be adequately reflected in the newly developed score.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Caparogullari, Hüseyin"],"institution":"Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Pape, Hans-Christoph"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010","date_published":"2010","updated_at":"2026-07-30T19:40:42Z","subjects":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Bewertungssystem","Prothetik","Arthrose","Komplikation","Medizin","Sprunggelenkendoprothese","Komplikationen","Literaturanaylse","evaluations system","ankle-joint endoprosthesis","prosthetics","arthrosis","complications","literature search"],"languages":["ger"],"rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-113994%22"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-113994%22","href":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-113994%22","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/51734","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"source_record":{"url":"https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/oai2d?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&identifier=oai%3Apublications.rwth-aachen.de%3A51734","prefix":"oai_dc"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Pape, Hans-Christoph"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Caparogullari, Hüseyin"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:coverage","label":"Dc Coverage","values":["DE"]},{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-32241"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis","info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Bewertungssystem","Prothetik","Arthrose","Komplikation","Medizin","Sprunggelenkendoprothese","Komplikationen","Literaturanaylse","evaluations system","ankle-joint endoprosthesis","prosthetics","arthrosis","complications","literature search"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["ger"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/51734","https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-113994%22"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["BACKGROUND: Following the failures of the first and the second generation of ankle joint endoprostheses, the newly developed third generation won increasing acceptance. Although there is a pronounced variance of the concepts in the literature search, so far no comparison for the fixation of these implants of the third generation has been conducted.MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the literature search available, results and complication rates of the implants of the third generation are compared. In order to make an exact analysis possible, a Complications-Revisions-Score was developed. This evaluation system focuses on the number of the complications and revisions in the post-operative process. The different follow-up examination times enter evaluation too. The studies with the selected endoprosthesis designs were subsequently analyzed with the help of the Complications-Revisions-Scores and received appropriate points of evaluation. Depending on the number of points obtained under the endoprosthesis designs, a ranking was provided based on the Complications-Revisions-Score.RESULTS: The literature search consisted of various databases such as PubMed and included the ankle joint endoprostheses of the third generation. Of a total of 53 publications concerning ankle-joint-Prosthetics, 26 studies dealt with the endoprostheses of the third generation. Of these, 23 studies with 8 different endoprostheses designs were included. After the application of the Complications-Revisions-Scores, the following implants showed small complication rates: New Jersey endoprosthesis (3.11 points), Buechel Pappas endoprosthesis (3.84 points) and the Salto endoprosthesis (4.31 points).CONCLUSION: The New Jersey, Buechel Pappas and the Salto endoprosthesis exhibited the smallest complication rates. The complication and revision rates appear to be adequately reflected in the newly developed score."]},{"key":"dc:source","label":"Dc Source","values":["Aachen : Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University III, 117 : Ill., graph. Darst. (2010). = Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2010"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Die Endoprothetik des oberen Sprunggelenkes : Metaanalyse der Sprunggelenkendoprothetik unter Anwendung eines Evaluations-Scores"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Pape, Hans-Christoph"],"dc:coverage":["DE"],"dc:creator":["Caparogullari, Hüseyin"],"dc:date":["2010"],"dc:description":["BACKGROUND: Following the failures of the first and the second generation of ankle joint endoprostheses, the newly developed third generation won increasing acceptance. Although there is a pronounced variance of the concepts in the literature search, so far no comparison for the fixation of these implants of the third generation has been conducted.MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the literature search available, results and complication rates of the implants of the third generation are compared. In order to make an exact analysis possible, a Complications-Revisions-Score was developed. This evaluation system focuses on the number of the complications and revisions in the post-operative process. The different follow-up examination times enter evaluation too. The studies with the selected endoprosthesis designs were subsequently analyzed with the help of the Complications-Revisions-Scores and received appropriate points of evaluation. Depending on the number of points obtained under the endoprosthesis designs, a ranking was provided based on the Complications-Revisions-Score.RESULTS: The literature search consisted of various databases such as PubMed and included the ankle joint endoprostheses of the third generation. Of a total of 53 publications concerning ankle-joint-Prosthetics, 26 studies dealt with the endoprostheses of the third generation. Of these, 23 studies with 8 different endoprostheses designs were included. After the application of the Complications-Revisions-Scores, the following implants showed small complication rates: New Jersey endoprosthesis (3.11 points), Buechel Pappas endoprosthesis (3.84 points) and the Salto endoprosthesis (4.31 points).CONCLUSION: The New Jersey, Buechel Pappas and the Salto endoprosthesis exhibited the smallest complication rates. The complication and revision rates appear to be adequately reflected in the newly developed score."],"dc:identifier":["https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/51734","https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/search?p=id:%22RWTH-CONV-113994%22"],"dc:language":["ger"],"dc:publisher":["Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University"],"dc:relation":["info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-32241"],"dc:rights":["info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess"],"dc:source":["Aachen : Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University III, 117 : Ill., graph. Darst. (2010). = Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2010"],"dc:subject":["info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610","Bewertungssystem","Prothetik","Arthrose","Komplikation","Medizin","Sprunggelenkendoprothese","Komplikationen","Literaturanaylse","evaluations system","ankle-joint endoprosthesis","prosthetics","arthrosis","complications","literature search"],"dc:title":["Die Endoprothetik des oberen Sprunggelenkes : Metaanalyse der Sprunggelenkendoprothetik unter Anwendung eines Evaluations-Scores"],"dc:type":["info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis","info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-30T19:40:42Z"}