Global ETD Search

Search theses and dissertations gathered from participating repositories worldwide. Every result links back to the library that holds it. No account is needed.

Results

Showing 1 to 4 of 4 for “"Bowers v. Hardwick"”.

  1. Bowers v. Lawrence: the Narratives of the Supreme Court

    … examines the rhetoric of the Court's opinions in Bowers v. Hardwick and Lawrence v. Texas from a narrative approach informed by theories on the rhetorical situation. The Bowers majority opinion is framed around themes of history, morality and a reductionist understanding of sexual orientation …

    mo-state Repository record for Bowers v. Lawrence: the Narratives of the Supreme Court (opens in a new tab)

  2. Dobbs is Different: Evaluating the Dobbs Decision's Lack of Strategy Compared to Landmark Sexual Privacy Cases

    … cases before Dobbs, namely Roe v. Wade (1973), Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), and Lawrence v. Texas (2003). After a thorough examination of the literature and outline of the strategic models, I will evaluate each case to identify how the decision was made strategically. I will then examine the …

    penn Repository record for Dobbs is Different: Evaluating the Dobbs Decision's Lack of Strategy Compared to Landmark Sexual Privacy Cases (opens in a new tab)

  3. "Blind to Certain Truths": Social Movement Narratives, The Supreme Court, and Cultural Change

    … Court," briefs and Court opinions in the <italic>Bowers v. Hardwick</italic> and <italic>Lawrence and Garner v. Texas</italic> cases, two of the most significant LGB rights cases, covering a span of nearly twenty years. Despite virtually identical casefacts, the Court handed down differing …

    siu-theses Repository record for "Blind to Certain Truths": Social Movement Narratives, The Supreme Court, and Cultural Change (opens in a new tab)

  4. Judicial rhetoric and radical politics: sexuality, race, and the fourteenth amendment

    “Judicial Rhetoric and Radical Politics: Sexuality, Race, and the Fourteenth Amendment” takes up U.S. judicial opinions as performances of sovereignty over the boundaries of legitimate subjectivity. The argumentative choices jurists make in producing judicial opinion delimit the grounds upon which …

    uiuc Repository record for Judicial rhetoric and radical politics: sexuality, race, and the fourteenth amendment (opens in a new tab)