Back to search

Wichita State University

Inciting anarchy in vigilance research: Addressing the limitations of reductionism

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Work one investigated the underlying mechanisms to the underlying mechanisms that were proposed by dominant theories on vigilance, and it concluded that the interaction among all those mechanisms define vigilance. Specifically, vigilance has neurochemical, electrophysiological, and chronobiological components that function both independently and interdependently amongst themselves. Work two further explored the complex biological underpinnings of this process by illuminating a fundamental limitation in our research strategy: reductionism. In the hopes of correcting course, work two proposed an ambidextrous research strategy that synergistically employed both reductionism and holism to understand the process researchers infer as vigilance. Work three implemented this strategy by creating a task that was able to capture multiple facets of vigilance performance, utilize environmental cues that contain bio-meaning, and present demands that evoke bidirectional aspects of vigilance’s functioning. The intersection of these factors was investigated using a combination of subjective, behavioral, and physiological metrics. The results of work three suggest the following: 1) vigilance performance may differ based on time-of-day and researchers should consider conducting experiments within a limited time-window; 2) prestimulus alpha power was associated with correct responses to rarelyoccurring trials, irrespective of these trials requiring unique responses; 3) vigilance can function in multiple ways given various task demands, some of which may be robust to performance decrements associated with time-on-task; and 4) greater resource allocation towards a task does not necessarily entail greater performance. Like vigilance, resource allocation may also be a multifaceted process requiring a multidimensional research strategy to meaningfully understand.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher
Wichita State University
Year dc:date.issued
2026

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Chong, Steven
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Baldwin, Carryl L.

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • © Copyright 2026 by Steven Chong All Rights Reserved
Language dc:language.iso
en_US

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Dc Identifier Other
d26005

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Wichita State University
Base URL
soar.wichita.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-08-21
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Chong, Steven. Inciting anarchy in vigilance research: Addressing the limitations of reductionism. Wichita State University, 2026. https://hdl.handle.net/10057/56108