Back to search

University of Leeds

The case of 'unwanted flexibility' : a study of temporary agency workers in the U.K

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Temporary agency work in Britain has increased dramatically in recent years. Theoretical justification for this growth is centred upon an organisational need for greater efficiency as a result of increased competition in the marketplace. Cost advantages are often associated with the temporary nature of the agency contract and recent discussion suggests that recruitment of agency workers is a strategic practice, used to create competitive advantage. (Williamson 1985; Atkinson and Meager 1986; Matuski and Hill 1998; Lepak and Snell 1999; Houseman et al 2003). Organisationally sound manpower strategies are thus reasoned to be those that deliberately incorporate agency workers in a thoughtful, strategic and continually advantageous way. From this perspective, it is assumed that management control over the contractual nature of the workforce is essential, and failure to retain this autonomy would result in organisational inefficiency. This thesis critically examines this conjecture, by investigating a situation where management cannot actively select the contracts on which they employee their staff. In the case of two Social Services departments in London, management have lost the ability to strategically determine the contractual nature of their workforce, stating a strong preference for open ended contracts, but forced to deploy agency workers when permanent staff cannot be recruited. Previous suggestions would indicate detrimental implications, but in this instance it is argued that these blanket assumptions may facilitate premature conclusions, as the associated consequences of this situation of `unwanted flexibility' are unexplored.

Degree

thesis:*
Name dc:type.qualificationname
Ph.D
Level dc:type.qualificationlevel
doctoral
Grantor dc:publisher.institution
University of Leeds
Year dc:date.issued
2006

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Mollitt, Sarah Elizabeth
Advisors dc:contributor.advisor
  • Forde, C.
  • Kirkpatrick, I.

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
uk.bl.ethos.513957
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:316

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
White Rose University Consortium
Base URL
etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/cgi/oai2
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Mollitt, Sarah Elizabeth. The case of 'unwanted flexibility' : a study of temporary agency workers in the U.K. doctoral thesis, University of Leeds, 2006.