Back to search

Virginia Tech

Comparing 12 finite state models of examinee performance on multiple-choice tests

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Finite state test theory models the response behavior of an examinee and establishes the relationship between the ability of the examinee and the observed responses on a multiple-choice test. In finite state modeling, various assumptions about item characteristics and the examinees’ response strategies are made to estimate an examinee ability, and willingness to guess. Twelve sets of plausible assumptions about identifiability of distractors and examinee guessing strategies were adopted and the corresponding finite state models were actualized. Three consequences of the adoption of the 12 sets of assumptions were investigated: 1) the extent to which the resulting ability estimates rank ordered the examinees similarly, 2) variation in the magnitude of ability estimates and the estimated willingness to guess across the 12 models, and 3) the extent to which conclusions about examinees subgroups would differ according to the model employed. Also, conventional number-right scores were compared with the finite state scores with respect to the three outcomes just listed. All scoring methods rank ordered the examinees essentially the same. The magnitude of the finite state scores varied considerably across models mainly due to differing assumptions about the identifiability of distractors. Differing assumptions about examinee guessing strategy had surprisingly little effect on the magnitude of the ability estimates, though estimates of willingness to guess varied consistently according to the assumed strategies. Conclusions about group differences also varied across the models as a result of differing assumptions about both item characteristics and examinee guessing strategies.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph. D.
Level thesis:degree_level
doctoral
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Educational Research and Evaluation
Department dc:contributor.department
Educational Research and Evaluation
Grantor dc:publisher
Virginia Tech
Year dc:date.issued
1992

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Zin, Than Than
Chair dc:contributor.committeechair
  • Impara, James C.
Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
  • Frary, Robert B.
  • Garcia-Pérez, Miguel A.
  • Schulman, Robert S.
  • Weber, Larry J.
  • Wolfle, Lee M.

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • In Copyright
Language dc:language.iso
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Dc Identifier Other
etd-05042006-164507
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/37684

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Virginia Tech
Base URL
vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Zin, Than Than. Comparing 12 finite state models of examinee performance on multiple-choice tests. doctoral thesis, Virginia Tech, 1992. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/37684