Back to search

Royal Roads University

Common Ground, Contested Futures: Shared Values and Divided Attitudes Toward LNG in Squamish

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Amid geopolitical uncertainty, economic instability and climate imperatives, Canada’s rapid expansion of liquefied natural gas (LNG) infrastructure has generated contested responses, particularly in communities located near new developments. In this thesis, I focus on two interdependent LNG projects in British Columbia, a gas pipeline and an associated liquefaction facility, and explore the beliefs, values and attitudes that shape local responses. I argue that beliefs related to energy development extend beyond perceived benefits and risks of different technologies; they are about how people make sense of social change, identity, and their community's future. Consequently, shifting attitudes requires engaging with these deeper social dimensions and improving community engagement processes. Building on Boudet’s (2019) model of the factors influencing public perceptions of energy projects, I advocate for a greater focus on the role that emotions, worldviews, and lived experience play in shaping attitudes.

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Brindle, Caroline
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • MacArthur, Julie

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en_US

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:null:10613/29469

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Royal Roads University
Base URL
www.viurrspace.ca/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Brindle, Caroline. Common Ground, Contested Futures: Shared Values and Divided Attitudes Toward LNG in Squamish. 2026. https://hdl.handle.net/10613/29469